Did I Play This Horribly? Or Good Lay Down?
#2
Posted 21 April 2006 - 07:41 AM
-2Pac
#3
Posted 21 April 2006 - 07:54 AM
#4
Posted 21 April 2006 - 08:00 AM
My thinking on calling the 4.50 is ok...obviously the TAG is strong with a 5x BB raise, but maybe he is on JJ/1010 or AK/AQ playing from the button, and the laggy player was raising evvverything, but once it got back around to him, and he reraised, and the loose player called, I was fairly certain I was behind.
#5
Posted 21 April 2006 - 08:06 AM
I was just throwing out commentary and insight to my thought process when I play. I play a very tight cash game. I feel that if you aren't in control of the hand and the betting you are more often than not behind. Of course if you have a good read that you are ahead of your opponent(s), you should go with it.
#6
Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:05 AM
You shouldn't have gotten to see his reraise to 30bb's because you shouldve already had all your chips in the middle. Easy push from BB when
1. 3 handed
2. they have you covered
3. raise, reraise, you
4. you have QQ
lol
#7
Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:13 AM
You shouldn't have gotten to see his reraise to 30bb's because you shouldve already had all your chips in the middle. Easy push from BB when
1. 3 handed
2. they have you covered
3. raise, reraise, you
4. you have QQ
lol
This is terrible advice. You are a coinflip to AK and very likely behind to an overpair. I can't think of many easier situations to lay down QQ unless the good doctor is advocating never putting them down.
#8
Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:18 AM
Both players have me covered with 100+ BB
TAG button open raises to 2.50, laggy SB reraises to 4.50, Hero picks up QQ and calls.
Button re-raises to 15
SB Calls
Hero folds?
read over this again....
assumptions: (.25/.5; 3-handed; you're the BB; you're the small stack (20-30 dollars against 50+))
button raises, SB reraises, easy push
no questions
**edit : when do you lay them down?
for example if button holds other two ladies, he should fold to your push
#9
Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:27 AM
You shouldn't have gotten to see his reraise to 30bb's because you shouldve already had all your chips in the middle. Easy push from BB when
1. 3 handed
2. they have you covered
3. raise, reraise, you
4. you have QQ
lol
I agree w/ LJ this is horrible advice do you even play NL, and since TAG is in position i chuck this even faster to his reraise.
-2Pac
#10
Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:31 AM
#11
Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:40 AM
I gotta play with you saps.
You're going to laydown queens in a 3-handed game shortstacked when the SB reraises to 9bb's.
once again....
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
ahahaha
just so we're clear
i'm saying the mistake was calling the 4.50
once the button pushes you gotta lay it down, but you've lost your chance. Button could make this move for a number of reasons, the least of which being that the SB acts before you and you'll have to get off just about anything.
Button's range could be wide and you forfeited the opportunity to take an easy 7 bucks (which is big at these stakes.)
#12
Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:47 AM
Button's range could be wide and you forfeited the opportunity to take an easy 7 bucks (which is big at these stakes.)
Button is making this move cause he is strong and his range is not wide opening and reraising to $15 he has AA or KK 9 outta 10 and if he doesn't the SB does.
-2Pac
#13
Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:53 AM
you gotta admit this was a dumb addition
#14
Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:05 AM
The exception is that if villian is LAG or donkeyish then the possible holdings are greater, in which case, the hand becomes much more difficult to play.
#15
Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:10 AM
If this is three handed (didn't catch that at first), how can you not reraise the LAG given the button may just be on a total blind steal. We're gonna take the flop OOP and we have no idea where the TAG is, because he may have been on a blind steal and found himself w/ a nice price to take a flop and no idea where the LAG is because, well... he's a LAG and will probably like to raise the TAG when he comes in every once in a while. More of a case could be made for smooth calling a LAG open raise or if the LAG folded. (2nd not as much).
Given the call, it's a good fold, but I think Zebra thinks the same thing.
#16
Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:14 AM
If this is three handed (didn't catch that at first), how can you not reraise the LAG given the button may just be on a total blind steal. We're gonna take the flop OOP and we have no idea where the TAG is, because he may have been on a blind steal and found himself w/ a nice price to take a flop and no idea where the LAG is because, well... he's a LAG and will probably like to raise the TAG when he comes in every once in a while. More of a case could be made for smooth calling a LAG open raise or if the LAG folded. (2nd not as much).
Given the call, it's a good fold, but I think Zebra thinks the same thing.
indeed--the call was horrendous
#18
Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:17 AM
Makes sense.
TAG indeed had rockets
Question I posed still stands, probably biased on results. What were you plannin on doing on a 9 high board?
#19
Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:18 AM
He's pushing of course
-2Pac
#20
Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:26 AM
But I thought we were all in agreement that there's no way he could have action on the flop....
either he pushes on his first action preflop OR (as is)
he calls and folds on his second action preflop
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









