Jump to content


Did I Play This Horribly? Or Good Lay Down?


  • Please log in to reply
24 replies to this topic

#1 jjgoldy5

jjgoldy5

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 970 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cincinnati, OH - University of Cincinnati
  • Favorite Poker Game:PL Omaha8 and NLHE tournies

Posted 21 April 2006 - 07:37 AM

Short handed no limit .25/.50

Both players have me covered with 100+ BB

TAG button open raises to 2.50, laggy SB reraises to 4.50, Hero picks up QQ and calls.

Button re-raises to 15
SB Calls
Hero folds?

#2 krup24

krup24

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,561 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pittsburgh, PA

Posted 21 April 2006 - 07:41 AM

TAG reraises OOP to 30BBs we have to fold QQ here.
Give me a paper and pen so I can write about my life of sin. A couple bottles of gin in case I don't get in.
-2Pac

#3 MasterLJ

MasterLJ

    Bus Fare Gambler

  • Members
  • 2,576 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 07:54 AM

You may have even been able to put it down to the 4.50 raise. Calling is not horrible but it seems that we're not in control of the hand in any sense. We have a vulnerable hand and are out of position. The re-raise to $15 with 2 callers screams KK or AA, nice laydown.
Me Blog (Updated: **12/22/2006**)


#4 jjgoldy5

jjgoldy5

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 970 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cincinnati, OH - University of Cincinnati
  • Favorite Poker Game:PL Omaha8 and NLHE tournies

Posted 21 April 2006 - 08:00 AM

QUOTE (MasterLJ @ Friday, April 21st, 2006, 7:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You may have even been able to put it down to the 4.50 raise. Calling is not horrible but it seems that we're not in control of the hand in any sense. We have a vulnerable hand and are out of position. The re-raise to $15 with 2 callers screams KK or AA, nice laydown.


My thinking on calling the 4.50 is ok...obviously the TAG is strong with a 5x BB raise, but maybe he is on JJ/1010 or AK/AQ playing from the button, and the laggy player was raising evvverything, but once it got back around to him, and he reraised, and the loose player called, I was fairly certain I was behind.

#5 MasterLJ

MasterLJ

    Bus Fare Gambler

  • Members
  • 2,576 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 08:06 AM

QUOTE (jjgoldy5 @ Friday, April 21st, 2006, 9:00 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
My thinking on calling the 4.50 is ok...obviously the TAG is strong with a 5x BB raise, but maybe he is on JJ/1010 or AK/AQ playing from the button, and the laggy player was raising evvverything, but once it got back around to him, and he reraised, and the loose player called, I was fairly certain I was behind.


I was just throwing out commentary and insight to my thought process when I play. I play a very tight cash game. I feel that if you aren't in control of the hand and the betting you are more often than not behind. Of course if you have a good read that you are ahead of your opponent(s), you should go with it.
Me Blog (Updated: **12/22/2006**)


#6 DrZebra

DrZebra

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 625 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:05 AM

The TAG is the button, not OOP.

You shouldn't have gotten to see his reraise to 30bb's because you shouldve already had all your chips in the middle. Easy push from BB when
1. 3 handed
2. they have you covered
3. raise, reraise, you
4. you have QQ

lol
"...the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent."-J.M.Keynes

#7 MasterLJ

MasterLJ

    Bus Fare Gambler

  • Members
  • 2,576 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:13 AM

QUOTE (DrZebra @ Friday, April 21st, 2006, 11:05 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The TAG is the button, not OOP.

You shouldn't have gotten to see his reraise to 30bb's because you shouldve already had all your chips in the middle. Easy push from BB when
1. 3 handed
2. they have you covered
3. raise, reraise, you
4. you have QQ

lol


This is terrible advice. You are a coinflip to AK and very likely behind to an overpair. I can't think of many easier situations to lay down QQ unless the good doctor is advocating never putting them down.
Me Blog (Updated: **12/22/2006**)


#8 DrZebra

DrZebra

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 625 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:18 AM

QUOTE (jjgoldy5 @ Friday, April 21st, 2006, 8:37 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Short handed no limit .25/.50

Both players have me covered with 100+ BB

TAG button open raises to 2.50, laggy SB reraises to 4.50, Hero picks up QQ and calls.

Button re-raises to 15
SB Calls
Hero folds?



read over this again....

assumptions: (.25/.5; 3-handed; you're the BB; you're the small stack (20-30 dollars against 50+))

button raises, SB reraises, easy push

no questions

**edit : when do you lay them down?
for example if button holds other two ladies, he should fold to your push
"...the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent."-J.M.Keynes

#9 krup24

krup24

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,561 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pittsburgh, PA

Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:27 AM

QUOTE (DrZebra @ Friday, April 21st, 2006, 10:05 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The TAG is the button, not OOP.

You shouldn't have gotten to see his reraise to 30bb's because you shouldve already had all your chips in the middle. Easy push from BB when
1. 3 handed
2. they have you covered
3. raise, reraise, you
4. you have QQ

lol


I agree w/ LJ this is horrible advice do you even play NL, and since TAG is in position i chuck this even faster to his reraise.
Give me a paper and pen so I can write about my life of sin. A couple bottles of gin in case I don't get in.
-2Pac

#10 Scott3705

Scott3705

    Pay-Off Wizard

  • Members
  • 3,761 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:31 AM

I agree this is a good fold LT. Question though, what were you doing with a uncoordiated 9 high flop?

#11 DrZebra

DrZebra

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 625 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:40 AM

QUOTE (krup24 @ Friday, April 21st, 2006, 11:27 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I agree w/ LJ this is horrible advice do you even play NL, and since TAG is in position i chuck this even faster to his reraise.



I gotta play with you saps.
You're going to laydown queens in a 3-handed game shortstacked when the SB reraises to 9bb's.

once again....
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
ahahaha

just so we're clear

i'm saying the mistake was calling the 4.50

once the button pushes you gotta lay it down, but you've lost your chance. Button could make this move for a number of reasons, the least of which being that the SB acts before you and you'll have to get off just about anything.

Button's range could be wide and you forfeited the opportunity to take an easy 7 bucks (which is big at these stakes.)
"...the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent."-J.M.Keynes

#12 krup24

krup24

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,561 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pittsburgh, PA

Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:47 AM

QUOTE (DrZebra @ Friday, April 21st, 2006, 10:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
once the button pushes you gotta lay it down, but you've lost your chance. Button could make this move for a number of reasons, the least of which being that the SB acts before you and you'll have to get off just about anything.

Button's range could be wide and you forfeited the opportunity to take an easy 7 bucks (which is big at these stakes.)


Button is making this move cause he is strong and his range is not wide opening and reraising to $15 he has AA or KK 9 outta 10 and if he doesn't the SB does.
Give me a paper and pen so I can write about my life of sin. A couple bottles of gin in case I don't get in.
-2Pac

#13 DrZebra

DrZebra

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 625 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:53 AM

QUOTE (krup24 @ Friday, April 21st, 2006, 11:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
....and if he doesn't the SB does.


you gotta admit this was a dumb addition
"...the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent."-J.M.Keynes

#14 Dratj

Dratj

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,339 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:05 AM

Depends on how big your stack is. If you have 100 BB also then smooth call. Your implied odds are there. hope to flop the set. Fold if you don't hit because villian likely has AA or KK.
The exception is that if villian is LAG or donkeyish then the possible holdings are greater, in which case, the hand becomes much more difficult to play.

#15 Scott3705

Scott3705

    Pay-Off Wizard

  • Members
  • 3,761 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:10 AM

I'm going to have to agree w/ Zebra.

If this is three handed (didn't catch that at first), how can you not reraise the LAG given the button may just be on a total blind steal. We're gonna take the flop OOP and we have no idea where the TAG is, because he may have been on a blind steal and found himself w/ a nice price to take a flop and no idea where the LAG is because, well... he's a LAG and will probably like to raise the TAG when he comes in every once in a while. More of a case could be made for smooth calling a LAG open raise or if the LAG folded. (2nd not as much).

Given the call, it's a good fold, but I think Zebra thinks the same thing.

#16 DrZebra

DrZebra

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 625 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:14 AM

QUOTE (Scott3705 @ Friday, April 21st, 2006, 12:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm going to have to agree w/ Zebra.

If this is three handed (didn't catch that at first), how can you not reraise the LAG given the button may just be on a total blind steal. We're gonna take the flop OOP and we have no idea where the TAG is, because he may have been on a blind steal and found himself w/ a nice price to take a flop and no idea where the LAG is because, well... he's a LAG and will probably like to raise the TAG when he comes in every once in a while. More of a case could be made for smooth calling a LAG open raise or if the LAG folded. (2nd not as much).

Given the call, it's a good fold, but I think Zebra thinks the same thing.



indeed--the call was horrendous
"...the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent."-J.M.Keynes

#17 jjgoldy5

jjgoldy5

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 970 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cincinnati, OH - University of Cincinnati
  • Favorite Poker Game:PL Omaha8 and NLHE tournies

Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:16 AM

Ok, so, bad call, good fold. Got it.


Makes sense.

TAG indeed had rockets

#18 Scott3705

Scott3705

    Pay-Off Wizard

  • Members
  • 3,761 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:17 AM

QUOTE (jjgoldy5 @ Friday, April 21st, 2006, 11:16 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Ok, so, bad call, good fold. Got it.
Makes sense.

TAG indeed had rockets

Question I posed still stands, probably biased on results. What were you plannin on doing on a 9 high board?

#19 krup24

krup24

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,561 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pittsburgh, PA

Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:18 AM

QUOTE (Scott3705 @ Friday, April 21st, 2006, 11:17 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Question I posed still stands, probably biased on results. What were you plannin on doing on a 9 high board?



He's pushing of course
Give me a paper and pen so I can write about my life of sin. A couple bottles of gin in case I don't get in.
-2Pac

#20 DrZebra

DrZebra

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 625 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:26 AM

QUOTE (krup24 @ Friday, April 21st, 2006, 12:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
He's pushing of course



But I thought we were all in agreement that there's no way he could have action on the flop....
either he pushes on his first action preflop OR (as is)
he calls and folds on his second action preflop
"...the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent."-J.M.Keynes




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users