Jump to content

2006 Draft Order Announced


Recommended Posts

More importantly, the Diamondbacks get to add another gem to their treasure trove of prospects with the 11th and 34th picks. Not too shabby.I doubt Koop finds that more important than where the Royals pick, though. lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
a first for the A's or a first for any team?
There have been plenty of teams that don't have first round picks because of free agents they signed (in the case of the A's, I would assume Frank Thomas).Over the last few years, the Giants have been notorious for giving up those picks. There's a whole free agent-draft pick system thing that is in place. You can look it up if you care.
Link to post
Share on other sites
There have been plenty of teams that don't have first round picks because of free agents they signed (in the case of the A's, I would assume Frank Thomas).Over the last few years, the Giants have been notorious for giving up those picks. There's a whole free agent-draft pick system thing that is in place. You can look it up if you care.
I am well aware of the fact that there have been teams without first round picks...I was asking the guy what he meant by the statement.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I am well aware of the fact that there have been teams without first round picks...I was asking the guy what he meant by the statement.
Sorry, I hit the wrong reply quote button.
Link to post
Share on other sites
There have been plenty of teams that don't have first round picks because of free agents they signed (in the case of the A's, I would assume Frank Thomas).
That was also my first thought, but it's actually Washington's pick (the Loaiza signing).
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...