WestcoastCanuck 0 Posted April 18, 2006 Share Posted April 18, 2006 I'm small blind. 6 handed, I get dealt As Qs Qd Qh. Should I call a raise with this hand. What if the Qs is the Qc. Link to post Share on other sites
cubbybri 0 Posted April 19, 2006 Share Posted April 19, 2006 I don't like calling the raise. You nut flush draw is really the only good thing to come out. But you also have nut straight possibilities depending on the flop.I'd wait for the more experienced but I say you can find a better hand to play since you're going to be missing outs.I'd be even less inclined to call with the Qc. Link to post Share on other sites
JacKingOff_suit 0 Posted April 19, 2006 Share Posted April 19, 2006 Ignoring other factors such as stack sizes or the qualities of your oppositions.With a pair your chance of hitting a set on the flop is 1/7.5.With three of them your chance of hitting a set on the flop is about 1 in 50.So will you play just two cards, AQs in a 4-carded game where you have a tremendous positional disadvantage? Link to post Share on other sites
Vman96 0 Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 With three of them your chance of hitting a set on the flop is about 1 in 50.Not sure where you got that from. It's 1 in 16 to hit the case queen. Nevertheless, muck this fast. Why waste more money on a hand that is going to make you check/fold the flop 90% of the time? I know people hate forfeiting blind bets...but sometimes it's a good idea. Link to post Share on other sites
JacKingOff_suit 0 Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 Not sure where you got that from. It's 1 in 16 to hit the case queen. Nevertheless, muck this fast. Why waste more money on a hand that is going to make you check/fold the flop 90% of the time? I know people hate forfeiting blind bets...but sometimes it's a good idea. Oops!1. The chance of hitting the set with a pair = 1- (46/48)x(45/47)x(44/46) ~= 13% ~= 1/7.52. The chance of hitting the set with 3 in your hand = 1 - (47/48)x(46/47)x(45/46) = 6.25% = 1/16.Yeah my bad I guessed I might had accidentally put in (1-47/48) instead of 1-(45/48) . Link to post Share on other sites
FullMontyM1 0 Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 This is a completely unplayable hand, fold.Monty Link to post Share on other sites
SGFULTON83 0 Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 I fold without hesitationI fold without hesitation Link to post Share on other sites
greatwhite 0 Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 Daniel says that he plays like 95% of the hands online. I bet this one is in the other 5%. Link to post Share on other sites
JacKingOff_suit 0 Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 Daniel says that he plays like 95% of the hands online. I bet this one is in the other 5%. No Daniel says he raises 95% of the time, may be he will just be calling with this hand and pot the flop no matter what comes. :)I don't really know how to play well with that loose-aggressive style, I tried at the $.01/.02 table twice but once I lost $5 another time I was ahead $3. A lot of fun but not much profits, players just don't care about pennies.Ok, I tried it once at $200 and got burned. Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 You really shouldn't be calling raises with anything in the SB, definately not with this.good luck. Link to post Share on other sites
pmk-one 0 Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 Does anyone's opinion change if the hand was AQAA, or is this equally unplayable? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now