Jump to content


lets play... what would you do?


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#1 Suited_Up

Suited_Up

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 25,710 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago
  • Interests:Poker and Sports

Posted 04 March 2005 - 02:02 PM

Tell me what you would do up to this point in the hand... 2nd half is coming later.***** Hand History for Game 1684471374 *****$25 NL Hold'em - Friday, March 04, 16:52:23 EDT 2005Table Table 36917 (Real Money)Seat 2 is the buttonTotal number of players : 10 Seat 1: J_P_O_L ( $22.55 )Seat 4: digthisd ( $30.05 )Seat 6: plotskins ( $17.4 )Seat 8: bordprice ( $27.8 )Seat 9: AimeeKRay ( $9.2 )Seat 7: Suited__Up ( $35.75 )Seat 10: kashei ( $37.3 )Seat 5: wu1chef ( $21.5 )Seat 2: joeflip ( $11.75 )Seat 3: i_dabble420 ( $25 )digthisd posts small blind [$0.1].wu1chef posts big blind [$0.25].** Dealing down cards **Dealt to Suited__Up [ Kc Js ]plotskins raises [$0.5].Suited__Up calls [$0.5].bordprice folds.AimeeKRay folds.kashei folds.J_P_O_L folds.joeflip folds.digthisd folds.wu1chef calls [$0.25].** Dealing Flop ** [ 5s, Ks, 5h ]wu1chef checks.plotskins bets [$4].That's all for now... tell me your next move. Make sure to go through play by play, look at the bets and everything... What's it look like he has, and what would you do here?I'll post the other half after a couple responses.
-Kurt

#2 Guest_XXEddie_*

Guest_XXEddie_*
  • Guests

Posted 04 March 2005 - 02:31 PM

its very likely he has AA, KK, or AK, so I fold

#3 Suited_Up

Suited_Up

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 25,710 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago
  • Interests:Poker and Sports

Posted 04 March 2005 - 02:33 PM

XXEddie said:

its very likely he has AA, KK, or AK, so I fold
No, look closer. He raised the minimum preflop.Bet $4 into a pot of 1.50
-Kurt

#4 Smasharoo

Smasharoo

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 8,879 posts
  • Location:Boston

Posted 04 March 2005 - 02:40 PM

No, look closer.He raised the minimum preflop.Bet $4 into a pot of 1.50How would that make it any less likely you're beat here?Why would you even pnder calling in a pot this small. NL is about winning big pots when you have a massive edge, not fighting for tiny pots when it's unlikely that you're ahead.Easy fold.

#5 the_stein

the_stein

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 820 posts
  • Location:Boca Raton

Posted 04 March 2005 - 02:41 PM

he has qq doesn't he
Suggestive thinking, causing your perspective to change

And when I need to free my mind
I can find, satisfaction in a bag of weed
Everything I need, leave it to the trees
It can make me feel better, and every day I wake
Niggas rollin' up blunts, and mo blunts, and mo blunts
And I keep a case of Swisher Sweets in the trunk
So when I'm rollin', smokin', chokin', just floatin

#6 sloshr

sloshr

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 754 posts
  • Location:Covina, CA
  • Favorite Poker Game:mixed, esp with badugi

Posted 04 March 2005 - 02:46 PM

Why did you cold call a raise from EP with KJo? I assume I forgot to muck my cards preflop, so I make up for that by doing it now. Is next part "you call turn card is a 2 and he goes all-in"? Good example of why you don't play this trash in the first place.

#7 Smasharoo

Smasharoo

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 8,879 posts
  • Location:Boston

Posted 04 March 2005 - 02:49 PM

Why did you cold call a raise from EP with KJo? I assume I forgot to muck my cards preflop, so I make up for that by doing it now.Hi, it's a min raise in NL.The call is fine. Folding this pre-flop is beyond silly.

#8 sloshr

sloshr

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 754 posts
  • Location:Covina, CA
  • Favorite Poker Game:mixed, esp with badugi

Posted 04 March 2005 - 02:58 PM

KJ is not a good hand. It is an even worse hand in EP. Much worse when someone is showing strength. Too many ways to be dominated here. The min raise UTG probably means the raiser is a bad player that doesnt know how to protect a hand, not a lack of strength. Are you calling this to flop 2 pair? Implied odds are not there for that.Smash, normally I agree with you, bet not here. Unless by "beyond silly" you mean a good play. I save my money for the next hand, no expense here.

#9 Smasharoo

Smasharoo

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 8,879 posts
  • Location:Boston

Posted 04 March 2005 - 03:23 PM

Implied odds are not there for thatWhy would you be plaiyng to flop two pair?Getting 35 to 1 implied odds, I'm obviously calling here. Everyone should be calling here unless they're just terrible post flop and use pre-flop tightness as a crutch to compensate for poor post flop play costing them money....Not saying that's you, just saying that most people who don't understand NL is a game that's playe *much* more losely pre-flop than limit when played well are missing some fundemental concepts of the game.

#10 Suited_Up

Suited_Up

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 25,710 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago
  • Interests:Poker and Sports

Posted 04 March 2005 - 08:30 PM

Smasharoo said:

Implied odds are not there for thatWhy would you be plaiyng to flop two pair?Getting 35 to 1 implied odds, I'm obviously calling here. Everyone should be calling here unless they're just terrible post flop and use pre-flop tightness as a crutch to compensate for poor post flop play costing them money....Not saying that's you, just saying that most people who don't understand NL is a game that's playe *much* more losely pre-flop than limit when played well are missing some fundemental concepts of the game.
Thank you... I really didn't even want to bother arguing the preflop call. It's a min raise... I will call almost anything to that in NL. Who cares what it is, if I hit the flop right, I will bust people.As for the results...
-Kurt

#11 Suited_Up

Suited_Up

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 25,710 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago
  • Interests:Poker and Sports

Posted 04 March 2005 - 08:34 PM

I don't feel like searching for the HH, so I'll just tell you what happened.Here's my thinking. He raised the min preflop... Doesn't scream monster to me... so I don't believe he has AK, plus.... even more so... He bet over 2x the pot. Someone with AK just wouldn't do that... same if they have an overpair or a set for sure. People just don't do that. I was pretty sure he either had 2 spades or nothing, and wanted to buy this pot right now.After his $4 bet, he had 8 left... So I came over the top and put him all in. I was actually expecting him to fold. He called, and turned over AQspades.... No more spades came and I won a big pot.I'm sure everyone will tell me I made a bad move and should have folded, which is fine, you can have your opinion, but if you don't think that bet was strange, then you're crazy. I took a chance on this one and it worked out. So say what you will.
-Kurt

#12 Markmadness

Markmadness

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 146 posts

Posted 04 March 2005 - 08:47 PM

well now i know the answer and i thought he was on a spade draw was not sure of the the exact hand but i notice alot of people over bet pots when they have a flush draw. But he was all in with this hand regardless.

#13 Suited_Up

Suited_Up

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 25,710 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago
  • Interests:Poker and Sports

Posted 04 March 2005 - 08:58 PM

Markmadness said:

well now i know the answer and i thought he was on a spade draw was not sure of the the exact hand but i notice alot of people over bet pots when they have a flush draw. But he was all in with this hand regardless.
I notice the same thing. And I know it sounds crazy, but AQ spades is honestly the hand I first thought of. I didn't make the decision based on that as much as the overbet, but I really thought flush draw.
-Kurt

#14 Smasharoo

Smasharoo

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 8,879 posts
  • Location:Boston

Posted 04 March 2005 - 09:53 PM

I'm sure everyone will tell me I made a bad move and should have foldedThis is correct.Mainly because you did and got lucky.Don't confuse that with it being the right play.

#15 Suited_Up

Suited_Up

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 25,710 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago
  • Interests:Poker and Sports

Posted 04 March 2005 - 11:10 PM

Smasharoo said:

I'm sure everyone will tell me I made a bad move and should have foldedThis is correct.Mainly because you did and got lucky.Don't confuse that with it being the right play.
I'm not saying it will always be right... but I really thought this time it was. If you're talking from a math, theory standpoint, it may be wrong. But if you're playing the player, it was right this time to me.
-Kurt

#16 NormanHaupt

NormanHaupt

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,267 posts

Posted 04 March 2005 - 11:21 PM

lmao
Suddenly I turned around
And she was standin' there
With silver bracelets on her wrists
And flowers in her hair.
She walked up to me so gracefully
And took my crown of thorns.
"Come in," she said,
"I'll give you shelter from the storm."

#17 JETMECMAN

JETMECMAN

    Poker Forum Newbie

  • Members
  • 10 posts
  • Interests:CARDS

Posted 05 March 2005 - 03:36 PM

He nailed the A, 5 and over bet fold in order to get it back later.
I only want three things at the card table
Hold Cards of Steel, Turns of Gold, and
The Ability to Bluff the Lack of Either




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users