Jump to content


Kq


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

#1 Scott3705

Scott3705

    Pay-Off Wizard

  • Members
  • 3,761 posts

Posted 08 April 2006 - 07:24 PM

Not a whole lot of main villain. I saw him get out of line once with a gutshot draw draw but that's it. hasn't shown down a whole lot.

2/4online

Mp2 (main villain) limps, MP3 limps, I raise in CO with K icon_suit_diamond.gif q icon_suit_diamond.gif
BB calls, and two limpers call

FLOP ($17)

Q J 7 (rainbow)

BB checks, Villain bets, MP3 calls, I raise, BB folds Villain 3 bets, MP3 folds, I????

Turn:

9

Villain bets, I????

#2 Actuary

Actuary

    .

  • Members
  • 19,026 posts

Posted 08 April 2006 - 08:07 PM

get to sd cheaply after you are HU on the flop.

#3 Scott3705

Scott3705

    Pay-Off Wizard

  • Members
  • 3,761 posts

Posted 08 April 2006 - 08:19 PM

QUOTE (Actuary @ Saturday, April 8th, 2006, 8:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
get to sd cheaply after you are HU on the flop.


What the hell am I beating tho?

#4 Actuary

Actuary

    .

  • Members
  • 19,026 posts

Posted 08 April 2006 - 08:34 PM

well...

if I'm counting right, you are getting 14:1 on the flop call..that's a no brainer.

On the turn, you picked up a gutshot.

On the river you'll be getting 10.5 : 1... with TP2K. I'd say you still win 10% of the time.

#5 LongLiveYorke

LongLiveYorke

    Ending the world one proton at a time

  • Members
  • 8,221 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manhattan
  • Interests:fizziks, teh maths, Raid-o-head, Rod Reynolds

Posted 08 April 2006 - 09:50 PM

I agree with Actuary. Show it down (cheaply)!

#6 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 36,830 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thunder Bay, ON

Posted 09 April 2006 - 02:26 AM

QUOTE (LongLiveYorke @ Sunday, April 9th, 2006, 1:50 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I agree with Actuary. Show it down (cheaply)!

QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#7 screech

screech

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,376 posts

Posted 09 April 2006 - 02:31 AM

QUOTE (Scott3705 @ Saturday, April 8th, 2006, 9:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What the hell am I beating tho?


QT, Q8, 98, T9.

Like Actuary said, you picked up a gutter on the turn, so your not folding. And folding the river in a pot this big against a player capable of getting out of line would be horrendous.

#8 ICrushHomeGames

ICrushHomeGames

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 304 posts
  • Location:Waco

Posted 09 April 2006 - 09:06 AM

C/c down. You can't predict that 9 on the turn.
"It was pretty awful to be in such a great spot and to be so unprepared for it."
-Erik Seidel

#9 The Nuts

The Nuts

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 785 posts
  • Location:Penn State University

Posted 09 April 2006 - 04:27 PM

I agree with the rest. C/C to showdown.
SuperUberBob: I ****ing hate this game
Zach6668: lol
Zubial: stop playing it
SuperUberBob: I like playing, just not the losing part
Zach6668: LOLZ

#10 Shimmering Wang

Shimmering Wang

    Daddy Wears the Daddy-Pants

  • Members
  • 6,361 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kalamazonk
  • Interests:I am very into ducks.

Posted 10 April 2006 - 10:07 AM

QUOTE (Scott3705 @ Saturday, April 8th, 2006, 11:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What the hell am I beating tho?


You're beating draws, and worse queens, but that's not even the point. Folding is a big mistake because you're rarely going to improve to a winner less than 1/15.5 (or whatever) times here. IF there's even a single diamond, folding becomes even worse.

When your myriad outs are taken in conjunction with the fact that you could have the best hand already, it's a pretty easy peel.

Picking up the gutter means you're showing down, almost automatically.

Wang

EDIT: Whoops. Miscalculated the number of bets in the pot on the flop. Fixed it.

#11 TB17

TB17

    Running all over your shit

  • Members
  • 8,928 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mississauga Ontario
  • Interests:TP/MM
  • Favorite Poker Game:2 Flop PLO.

Posted 10 April 2006 - 01:21 PM

Does anyone like a cap on the flop and then a check on the turn if he checks behind us when we see the gutshot? After the 3 bet we are sure to be behind, but then if we cap it and he calls, he might check the turn and then we check behind and we can get to s/d for a SB cheaper.

If he leads out on the turn then C/C, but in position I like a cap on the flop. Discuss?
Goodbye FCP.

#12 Shimmering Wang

Shimmering Wang

    Daddy Wears the Daddy-Pants

  • Members
  • 6,361 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kalamazonk
  • Interests:I am very into ducks.

Posted 10 April 2006 - 02:05 PM

QUOTE (TB17 @ Monday, April 10th, 2006, 4:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Does anyone like a cap on the flop and then a check on the turn if he checks behind us when we see the gutshot? After the 3 bet we are sure to be behind, but then if we cap it and he calls, he might check the turn and then we check behind and we can get to s/d for a SB cheaper.

If he leads out on the turn then C/C, but in position I like a cap on the flop. Discuss?


No, I'm pretty sure capping the flop is bad. Just because we likely have the odds to see a turn doesn't mean putting in extra bets on the flop is +EV. It MIGHT slow him down a little, but our "draw" on the flop isn't strong enough for a cap to be okay. We're simply not likely to improve on the turn (even to a gutshot draw or flush draw, depending on the suit of the flop). We're in rough shape against the hands most players 3-bet here, and we don't want to put in extra bets H/U.

Cheers,

Wang

#13 TB17

TB17

    Running all over your shit

  • Members
  • 8,928 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mississauga Ontario
  • Interests:TP/MM
  • Favorite Poker Game:2 Flop PLO.

Posted 10 April 2006 - 03:27 PM

We aren't capping because we are strong enough, it's more like a bluff to get a free turn card. It's not as bad because there's no flush draw out there so we aren't giving a free card to the flush draw.

The main thing we're trying to do is get to the river as cheap as possible. If our villain is the kind of person who constantly checks OOP after a raise (most people are), then I think it's ok.
Goodbye FCP.

#14 Shimmering Wang

Shimmering Wang

    Daddy Wears the Daddy-Pants

  • Members
  • 6,361 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kalamazonk
  • Interests:I am very into ducks.

Posted 10 April 2006 - 04:00 PM

QUOTE (TB17 @ Monday, April 10th, 2006, 6:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
We aren't capping because we are strong enough, it's more like a bluff to get a free turn card. It's not as bad because there's no flush draw out there so we aren't giving a free card to the flush draw.

The main thing we're trying to do is get to the river as cheap as possible. If our villain is the kind of person who constantly checks OOP after a raise (most people are), then I think it's ok.


Well, I think we're kind of confusing the issue, here. When we put a bet in, there is only one concern (longterm "image issues" nonwithstanding):

Is the bet +EV? Or, specifically here, "when I cap, will I make more money against his hand/range than if I just call?"

I still think it's a pretty easy "hell no."

Here's a few reasons why I think so:

1) Certain turns may accomplish the task of "earning" us a free card, regardless. If a jack, seven, or Ace comes off, he might check to us anyway, and we can check it right back. Most "scare cards" give us additional outs, anyway. Double fun good! Probably not very likely, but there's no reason to bloat the pot unneccessarily. Heck, he might even check a T because he's putting us on AK, like all morons do.

2) His 3-bet screams extreme strength. The type of player that slows down with a strong hand to a cap is rarely the same player who 3-bets when we raise, especially at this level. We might be drawing really slim, and just donking money away unneccessarily. There are very few turn cards that help us, or give us a "free card" worth taking. Don't let your judgment become colored because we just so happened to pick up a gut/shot on the turn.

3) If he leads the turn, we have no choice but slam our heads against a wall.

4) By your logic, it becomes correct to raise/cap almost ANY flop in position if we think there's a very good chance we're behind, but we're going to have to see a river anyway. Raising with middle-pair and an overcard is often a good idea (Sklansky and I agree here), but I imagine Sklansky would think capping when we're behind almost all the time and have no real draw is silly


Sorry, I'm a little drunk, so this might be a tad diiiisjointed


Wang

#15 Actuary

Actuary

    .

  • Members
  • 19,026 posts

Posted 10 April 2006 - 04:18 PM

I wish I was that smart sober.

I agree, cap bad.
Free card unlikely.
When free card come, it may have come anyway.

ps. I add nothing extra.

#16 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 36,830 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thunder Bay, ON

Posted 10 April 2006 - 04:34 PM

QUOTE (Actuary @ Monday, April 10th, 2006, 8:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I wish I was that smart sober.

I agree, cap bad.
Free card unlikely.
When free card come, it may have come anyway.

ps. I add nothing extra.

Please change your avatar.
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#17 The Nuts

The Nuts

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 785 posts
  • Location:Penn State University

Posted 10 April 2006 - 05:06 PM

Change yours too Zach. Penguins suck.
SuperUberBob: I ****ing hate this game
Zach6668: lol
Zubial: stop playing it
SuperUberBob: I like playing, just not the losing part
Zach6668: LOLZ

#18 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 36,830 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thunder Bay, ON

Posted 10 April 2006 - 05:07 PM

QUOTE (The Nuts @ Monday, April 10th, 2006, 9:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Change yours too Zach. Penguins suck.

Leave and never come back.
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#19 Shimmering Wang

Shimmering Wang

    Daddy Wears the Daddy-Pants

  • Members
  • 6,361 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kalamazonk
  • Interests:I am very into ducks.

Posted 10 April 2006 - 06:09 PM

QUOTE (Actuary @ Monday, April 10th, 2006, 7:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I wish I was that smart sober.

I agree, cap bad.
Free card unlikely.
When free card come, it may have come anyway.

ps. I add nothing extra.


1) Nothing I say is smart, ever.

2) I'm actually a wee bit smarter drunk. Natural environment, and all

3) I miss you, Actuary. How you doing? Send me a PM, gimme a rundown on your life. Last I saw, you were quitting your job?

4) Now I'm mega-wasted, and I rule


Wang

#20 The Nuts

The Nuts

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 785 posts
  • Location:Penn State University

Posted 10 April 2006 - 06:14 PM

Statistically, the Penguins really do suck. I'm not saying that just because I like another team.

Though Sidney Crosby is a damn good player.
SuperUberBob: I ****ing hate this game
Zach6668: lol
Zubial: stop playing it
SuperUberBob: I like playing, just not the losing part
Zach6668: LOLZ




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users