Jump to content


Worst F@@cking Bulls@@it Hand Ever!


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

#21 nutzbuster

nutzbuster

    Point taken....

  • Members
  • 11,370 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Phoenix / Motor City

Posted 25 March 2006 - 05:15 PM

I'm now full of vodka and could care less.Thanks for the input! Very entertaining :club: PEACE!



F Cancer

#22 Vatche

Vatche

    Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,680 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 March 2006 - 05:30 PM

View PostFIREonICE, on Saturday, March 25th, 2006, 3:25 PM, said:

1. why did you raise him 2800 chips? 2. you did the same exact thing here:stop bitching that he slow rolled you because you "hesitated" yourself thinking you had the best hand. all he did is the samething you did. donk
lolll...ur a moronic idiot...when someone "hollywoods" or hessitates, during play, its not called slow rolling, its called playing poker...he thought he had the best hand and he wanted the call...i cant believe u think that thats slow rolling.

#23 srblan

srblan

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 555 posts

Posted 25 March 2006 - 05:52 PM

View PostBeaverStyle, on Saturday, March 25th, 2006, 3:29 PM, said:

who cares if he slow rolled you. You had the worst hand the whole time, you lost.No bad beat, just an unlucky flop.... And there's no such thing, IMO, of slowrolling online.1. Multi-tabling.2. Cell phone call.C. Looking at a website.#. Multi-tabling.5. Taking a piss.49. Multi-tabling.
Maybe his porn got to a good part.

#24 BeaverStyle

BeaverStyle

    Come get some.

  • Members
  • 7,023 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Grand Rapids, MI
  • Interests:uh..... poker?
  • Favorite Poker Game:NL Texas Hold-em

Posted 25 March 2006 - 06:14 PM

View Postsrblan, on Saturday, March 25th, 2006, 5:52 PM, said:

Maybe his porn got to a good part.
nh.
I may not be a meteorologist, but it sure looks like it's rainin' bitches!

#25 Kaedin

Kaedin

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 262 posts

Posted 25 March 2006 - 06:17 PM

View Postdoublemeup, on Saturday, March 25th, 2006, 4:21 PM, said:

I got slowrolled at a final table. Guy took all his time but 1 second then shows the near nuts....bitchh. I was pissed that he slowrolled me more than me getting busted.
same thing happened to me at my last FT. I wont go into the details of the hand, but he took the full time allotted to call me with AT on a board of AAT87

#26 FourFlusher

FourFlusher

    Nice Hand, Sir.

  • Members
  • 1,631 posts

Posted 25 March 2006 - 09:45 PM

I do it a lot.It gives them confidence to stay in the hand, taking it for weakness.The guy flopped the nut house, betting out strong would tend to put people on edge.Every body want's to brag when they think they "sensed" weakness. So, you force feed them some and let them choke on it.It's a good play, not slow rolling.

#27 GrinderMJ

GrinderMJ

    Original

  • Members
  • 7,525 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 March 2006 - 10:10 PM

View PostFourFlusher, on Sunday, March 26th, 2006, 10:45 AM, said:

I do it a lot.It gives them confidence to stay in the hand, taking it for weakness.The guy flopped the nut house, betting out strong would tend to put people on edge.Every body want's to brag when they think they "sensed" weakness. So, you force feed them some and let them choke on it.It's a good play, not slow rolling.
what is with this forum and reading comprehension. He is not mad about the hesitation, simply the fact that the guy took a long time to call with the nut full house on the flop. I thought we settled this issue in this thread already.

#28 mrdannyg

mrdannyg

    Shufflin'

  • Members
  • 16,815 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 March 2006 - 10:12 PM

a lot of people do that, taking lots of time to make a play when they are really strong. frankly, it's one of the biggest tells (at low limits) that people have a very big hand.pretty funny actually. i love typing like "you must really want action on that AQ, eh?" before just calling with something strong, and have them show down their nuts. friggin donks.EDIT: man, i wish i had read that post above me before posting.
Long signatures are really annoying.

#29 FourFlusher

FourFlusher

    Nice Hand, Sir.

  • Members
  • 1,631 posts

Posted 25 March 2006 - 10:21 PM

I say we make Grinder the "settled monitor", and when something gets settled on a thread, he can call it, then, we don't have to pretend it's an interactive forum anymore and continue the charade of conversation.Any treads longer than three, four tops, long is an obvious waste of bandwitdth, and a certain indicator of poor reading comprehension.Dog jokes, that's what this place needs more of.

#30 Vatche

Vatche

    Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,680 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 March 2006 - 10:29 PM

View PostFourFlusher, on Saturday, March 25th, 2006, 10:21 PM, said:

I say we make Grinder the "settled monitor", and when something gets settled on a thread, he can call it, then, we don't have to pretend it's an interactive forum anymore and continue the charade of conversation.Any treads longer than three, four tops, long is an obvious waste of bandwitdth, and a certain indicator of poor reading comprehension.Dog jokes, that's what this place needs more of.
nutzbuster moved ALL IN, so there would be no point to take ur time to call with the Qs full, MAYBE mr QQ was multi tabling or on his cell phone or doing something that was distracting him, BUT, if mr QQ took his time on purpoose, hes a slow-rolling prick...next time,please read the whole original post(2 times) before clicking on the reply button...thank u for ur time.

#31 GrinderMJ

GrinderMJ

    Original

  • Members
  • 7,525 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 March 2006 - 10:35 PM

View PostFourFlusher, on Sunday, March 26th, 2006, 11:21 AM, said:

I say we make Grinder the "settled monitor", and when something gets settled on a thread, he can call it, then, we don't have to pretend it's an interactive forum anymore and continue the charade of conversation.Any treads longer than three, four tops, long is an obvious waste of bandwitdth, and a certain indicator of poor reading comprehension.Dog jokes, that's what this place needs more of.
Are you retarded? I said you have no reading comprehension, because you made some random post about acting slowly on hands, when the op was upset about his opponent slowrolling him with the nut full house after the op was already all in. That exact point was already discussed by a few of us in the thread already. Maybe try actually reading the thread before you post in it. If this makes me settled monitor, that's fine as long as you agree to be "the guy who is unable to comprehend basic things, then lashes out at people who point out his lack of reading comprehension". Actually that's not a very good name, let's just call you a tard

#32 FourFlusher

FourFlusher

    Nice Hand, Sir.

  • Members
  • 1,631 posts

Posted 25 March 2006 - 10:35 PM

How the **** is it slow rolling? There a rule I don't know about that says you have to bet as soon as you can?There could be 50 reasons for it, none of them any business of anybody else, as long as he doesn't take an excessive amount of time, which nobody claimed.Don't take much to put you guys off your game, does it?

#33 Vatche

Vatche

    Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,680 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 March 2006 - 10:38 PM

View PostFourFlusher, on Saturday, March 25th, 2006, 10:35 PM, said:

How the **** is it slow rolling? There a rule I don't know about that says you have to bet as soon as you can?There could be 50 reasons for it, none of them any business of anybody else, as long as he doesn't take an excessive amount of time, which nobody claimed.Don't take much to put you guys off your game, does it?
maybe ur right...the guy was probably worried about quad 10s...he made a great call.

#34 GrinderMJ

GrinderMJ

    Original

  • Members
  • 7,525 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 March 2006 - 10:42 PM

View PostFourFlusher, on Sunday, March 26th, 2006, 11:35 AM, said:

How the **** is it slow rolling? There a rule I don't know about that says you have to bet as soon as you can?There could be 50 reasons for it, none of them any business of anybody else, as long as he doesn't take an excessive amount of time, which nobody claimed.Don't take much to put you guys off your game, does it?
My iq drops everytime I read one of your posts. Let's see if me capping my point will help you see it. THE WHOLE POINT OF THE THREAD IS THAT THE OP IS MAD THAT HIS OPPONENT TOOK A LONG TIME TO CALL WITH QQ ON A Q1010 BOARD WHEN HIS OPPONENT WAS ALREADY ALL IN. TAHT IS AN AUTOMATIC CALL INSTANTANEOUSLY EVERY TIME. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TAKING YOUR TIME TO INDUCE BETS FROM YOUR OPPONENT.

#35 FourFlusher

FourFlusher

    Nice Hand, Sir.

  • Members
  • 1,631 posts

Posted 25 March 2006 - 10:49 PM

What he was probably worried about is "how am I goning to get the most money possible in this pot?"He's entitled to do that, and to be as successful as he can at it. Maybe he did, maybe he didn't, it's usually a judgment call. You can play all the "if I had done this would he have done that?" after the fact games you want, but, you'll never really know for sure.Slow rolling is when you deliberately let the losing hand think he won, then after a time, rolling over the winner. The accompanying cliche is, "good hand....but, not good enough". It's showboating at it's worst, and has no value other than to make the slowroller look like a "look how cool my hand is" jerk and/or an angle shooter trying to get in somebodies skull.You want to critique the guys play, or style, that's your right, but, try to use the appropriate terminolgy.That was my point all along.

#36 KowboyKoop

KowboyKoop

    The Excellence of Execution

  • Members
  • 9,131 posts
  • Location:Des Moines, Iowa

Posted 25 March 2006 - 10:53 PM

GrinderMJ is OWNING!!!!! the sh*t out of whoever is trying to argue with him. This thread is just retarded all around...as the OP's hand is nowhere NEAR "the biggest bullsh*t hand ever."

View PostFourFlusher, on Sunday, March 26th, 2006, 12:49 AM, said:

What he was probably worried about is "how am I goning to get the most money possible in this pot?"
No...the villian was not worried about this. Why? BECAUSE THE MOST MONEY POSSIBLE WAS ALREADY PUSHED INTO THE POT BY THE OP!!!! Thus..since he hesitated to call with a near invincible hand..that is slowrolling.
KowboyKoop >>>>>>>>>>> Teneight


Five years in the making

#37 GrinderMJ

GrinderMJ

    Original

  • Members
  • 7,525 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 March 2006 - 10:54 PM

View PostFourFlusher, on Sunday, March 26th, 2006, 11:49 AM, said:

What he was probably worried about is "how am I goning to get the most money possible in this pot?"He's entitled to do that, and to be as successful as he can at it. Maybe he did, maybe he didn't, it's usually a judgment call. You can play all the "if I had done this would he have done that?" after the fact games you want, but, you'll never really know for sure.Slow rolling is when you deliberately let the losing hand think he won, then after a time, rolling over the winner. The accompanying cliche is, "good hand....but, not good enough". It's showboating at it's worst, and has no value other than to make the slowroller look like a "look how cool my hand is" jerk and/or an angle shooter trying to get in somebodies skull.You want to critique the guys play, or style, that's your right, but, try to use the appropriate terminolgy.That was my point all along.
Ok, I don't know how you keep typing this long responses way otu of left field, but read your first post, your point is that the QQ man made a good play, and his hesitation showed weakness. Yes we all hesitate at times to conceal our hands ok, that's fine. The op was not mad about that at all. let me repeat, the op wasn't mad about the hesitation, he was mad about his opponent taking a long time to call his ALL IN opponent with top full house which is an instacall everytime. I will repeat again, he was mad about his opponent taking his time to call an all in opponent with the near nuts that he was obviously not folding. My first response to you was that you missed the point of the op, and your point had already been discussed bya few of us. That is all. He can't get into anybody's head or play mind games with top boat and an all in opponent because he is about to bust that opponent, what is the point. It is clearly a form of slowrolling, because he allows his opponent to think his all in bet is the best hand, when the QQ opponent knows he is about to win the hand. Let's leave it at that

#38 FourFlusher

FourFlusher

    Nice Hand, Sir.

  • Members
  • 1,631 posts

Posted 25 March 2006 - 11:00 PM

You guys are too easy. :club: Now I understand the dog posts.Sorry I lowered your I.Q., Grinder, I thought you guys could enjoy boolshitting about poker, I was wrong.Oh, well, not the first time.

#39 stealfromblind

stealfromblind

    shnlhe king

  • Members
  • 1,097 posts

Posted 25 March 2006 - 11:15 PM

personally i ****ing hate people that slow roll me online. for example last night i had kk on a board of 10AJAA, i bet out the river and he raises. i think for a split second a decide that if he has quads i will pay him off and push all in. maybe i should've just called but oh well. he sits there and lets the time almost run out and then types in the chat "you sure about that?" and then calls. turns over quads. slow rolling is probably the only thing that pisses me off while playing online. if this **** was in my home game i would kick his head in. or maybe i'm just saying that because i'm drunk. no i would still kick his head in.
"an ace with no kicker is like a chick with no tits"
-doyle brunson

say goodbye to the free world.

#40 Vatche

Vatche

    Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,680 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 March 2006 - 11:26 PM

View PostFourFlusher, on Saturday, March 25th, 2006, 10:49 PM, said:

What he was probably worried about is "how am I goning to get the most money possible in this pot?"He's entitled to do that, and to be as successful as he can at it. Maybe he did, maybe he didn't, it's usually a judgment call. You can play all the "if I had done this would he have done that?" after the fact games you want, but, you'll never really know for sure.Slow rolling is when you deliberately let the losing hand think he won, then after a time, rolling over the winner. The accompanying cliche is, "good hand....but, not good enough". It's showboating at it's worst, and has no value other than to make the slowroller look like a "look how cool my hand is" jerk and/or an angle shooter trying to get in somebodies skull.You want to critique the guys play, or style, that's your right, but, try to use the appropriate terminolgy.That was my point all along.
ALLBeing or representing the entire or total number, amount, or quantity: All the windows are open. Deal all the cards. See Synonyms at whole. Constituting, being, or representing the total extent or the whole: all Christendom. Being the utmost possible of: argued the case in all seriousness. Every: got into all manner of trouble. Any whatsoever: beyond all doubt. INTo put into or onto: encapsulate. To go into or onto: enplane. To cover or provide with: enrobe. To cause to be: endear.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users