I am a degenerate sports gambler. I strongly advise that notwithstanding my opinions below, that anybody with access to a sportsbook run out and bet the opposite of what I like and you likely will make money.
Gonzaga v. Xavier. 3 seed v. 14. Xavier from a weak *** conference that got zero respect (see 26-2 GW as 8 seed). Xavier did win conf. tourney but thats all they got going. Spread is 5. LOVE Gonzaga to cover.
Syracuse v. Texas A&M: 5 seed v. 12. Cuse has more momentum than any team in the country for what its worth. Looking over A&Ms schedule their most impressive win was against their arch rival, and it was a buzzer beater. A&M is from another weak sisters of the poor conference who already is off to a less than impressive tourney start (see Oklahoma). Spread is pick em. Load up on Cuse.
Duke v. Southern 1 v. 16. I did some checking on Southern. They lost to the aforementioned A&M by 44 and to LSU by 36. Duke should win this game by 40 and the spread is only 24. Take the points and run with them.
Good luck.
Gambling On Tonights Games
Started by Pokergolf, Mar 16 2006 03:46 PM
6 replies to this topic
#2
Posted 16 March 2006 - 08:22 PM
QUOTE (Pokergolf @ Thursday, March 16th, 2006, 5:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I am a degenerate sports gambler. I strongly advise that notwithstanding my opinions below, that anybody with access to a sportsbook run out and bet the opposite of what I like and you likely will make money.
Gonzaga v. Xavier. 3 seed v. 14. Xavier from a weak *** conference that got zero respect (see 26-2 GW as 8 seed). Xavier did win conf. tourney but thats all they got going. Spread is 5. LOVE Gonzaga to cover.
Syracuse v. Texas A&M: 5 seed v. 12. Cuse has more momentum than any team in the country for what its worth. Looking over A&Ms schedule their most impressive win was against their arch rival, and it was a buzzer beater. A&M is from another weak sisters of the poor conference who already is off to a less than impressive tourney start (see Oklahoma). Spread is pick em. Load up on Cuse.
Duke v. Southern 1 v. 16. I did some checking on Southern. They lost to the aforementioned A&M by 44 and to LSU by 36. Duke should win this game by 40 and the spread is only 24. Take the points and run with them.
Good luck.
Gonzaga v. Xavier. 3 seed v. 14. Xavier from a weak *** conference that got zero respect (see 26-2 GW as 8 seed). Xavier did win conf. tourney but thats all they got going. Spread is 5. LOVE Gonzaga to cover.
Syracuse v. Texas A&M: 5 seed v. 12. Cuse has more momentum than any team in the country for what its worth. Looking over A&Ms schedule their most impressive win was against their arch rival, and it was a buzzer beater. A&M is from another weak sisters of the poor conference who already is off to a less than impressive tourney start (see Oklahoma). Spread is pick em. Load up on Cuse.
Duke v. Southern 1 v. 16. I did some checking on Southern. They lost to the aforementioned A&M by 44 and to LSU by 36. Duke should win this game by 40 and the spread is only 24. Take the points and run with them.
Good luck.
not looking good are you?
#3
Posted 16 March 2006 - 08:54 PM
#4
Posted 16 March 2006 - 09:07 PM
glad u chose to bet against a&m...shows the lack of respect a&m got all season. The beat, UT, Oklahoma, OSU, Tech twice...but yeah they arent any good. they made syracuse look like the overrated team everybody thought they would be.
I learned a great bit of info when pickin games...Dont ever base it off of the recent tourney results...base it off the season and no team that loses by 39 deserves a 5 seed
I learned a great bit of info when pickin games...Dont ever base it off of the recent tourney results...base it off the season and no team that loses by 39 deserves a 5 seed
www.mattnxtc.blogspot.com
#5
Posted 16 March 2006 - 09:14 PM
QUOTE (Pokergolf @ Thursday, March 16th, 2006, 5:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Duke v. Southern 1 v. 16. I did some checking on Southern. They lost to the aforementioned A&M by 44 and to LSU by 36. Duke should win this game by 40 and the spread is only 24. Take the points and run with them.
Good luck.
Good luck.
I would never pick a team with Paulus to cover a 24 point spread. He'll find a way to blow that. Seriously, he's nothing w/o shelden williams and Redick.
#6
Posted 16 March 2006 - 10:12 PM
My buddy had a six team parlay working tonight, with spreads. BC covers in 2OT, then GW comes back to cover in OT, finally he needs Gonzaga to win by 6 to clinch it, sure enough, they allow an uncontested layup to close the gap to 4 with .9 seconds left. Sports are rigged.
"We must recognize and rearticulate our passion as the attack that so many have presumed it to be"
#7
Posted 17 March 2006 - 07:20 PM
QUOTE (InsanityCubed @ Thursday, March 16th, 2006, 10:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
My buddy had a six team parlay working tonight, with spreads. BC covers in 2OT, then GW comes back to cover in OT, finally he needs Gonzaga to win by 6 to clinch it, sure enough, they allow an uncontested layup to close the gap to 4 with .9 seconds left. Sports are rigged.
yeah this killed me, had a big bet on Pacific +8, to lose that in 2OT sucked -- life goes on...
"So you're Sicilian, huh?"
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









