I've been mainly playing 25NL 10-hanged ring games online now, but more recently I've been reading posts from people who prefer the 6-max NL tables over the 10-seater games.I'm going to give the 6-max tables a go. Loosening up the hand range a little would be an obvious change, but I thought I'd ask how you think a 6-max table should be played differently over the full table?Is a 6-max game a better NL game over a full ring?
10-handed Vs 6-max Nl
Started by Lexomatic, Mar 12 2006 01:41 PM
3 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 12 March 2006 - 01:41 PM
#2
Posted 12 March 2006 - 03:24 PM
Variance is higher so have a suffient BRPosition play is more prevalentI play 6 max NL as well because i like a faster moving game
Give me a paper and pen so I can write about my life of sin. A couple bottles of gin in case I don't get in.
-2Pac
-2Pac
#3
Posted 13 March 2006 - 08:37 AM
i was a mediocre 9 handed player, winning more than losing but not making nay strides, i switched to 6 handed nlhe mainly .50/1 with a little 1/2 and having fairly good results. i was getting aggrevated on the time a 9 handed table takes to play hands and find the speed of the 6 handed far more enjoyable, and profitable.
#4
Posted 13 March 2006 - 02:27 PM
Lexomatic, on Sunday, March 12th, 2006, 1:41 PM, said:
I've been mainly playing 25NL 10-hanged ring games online now, but more recently I've been reading posts from people who prefer the 6-max NL tables over the 10-seater games.I'm going to give the 6-max tables a go. Loosening up the hand range a little would be an obvious change, but I thought I'd ask how you think a 6-max table should be played differently over the full table?Is a 6-max game a better NL game over a full ring?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









