Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (9 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx
Preflop: Hero is BB with A :icon_suit_heart:, A :icon_suit_diamond:.
1 fold, UTG+1 raises, 3 folds, CO calls, 1 fold, SB calls, Hero 3-bets, UTG+1 calls, CO calls, SB calls.
Flop: (12 SB) 7 :icon_suit_diamond:, 8 :icon_suit_club:, K :icon_suit_diamond: (4 players)
SB checks, Hero bets, UTG+1 folds, CO calls, SB calls.
Turn: (7.50 BB) 6 :icon_suit_club: (3 players)
SB checks, Hero bets, CO calls, SB calls.
River: (10.50 BB) K :icon_suit_heart: (3 players)
SB checks, Hero ....
-----
Give me some feed back guys
River Plan
Started by Zach6668, Mar 07 2006 11:26 PM
9 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 07 March 2006 - 11:26 PM
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.
#2
Posted 08 March 2006 - 12:53 AM
lead it into 2 guys who havent shown much aggression...
since no one put a raise in the whole way keep your lead as i wouldnt expect them to wake up now, anyone with the K would have almost def. put a raise in at some point...
check/calling has arguments also as you could induce a bluff from a worse hand
but it is likely that worse hand will call anyways(such as TT)...so dont lose 2 possible bb's
since no one put a raise in the whole way keep your lead as i wouldnt expect them to wake up now, anyone with the K would have almost def. put a raise in at some point...
check/calling has arguments also as you could induce a bluff from a worse hand
but it is likely that worse hand will call anyways(such as TT)...so dont lose 2 possible bb's
#3
Posted 08 March 2006 - 01:32 AM
QUOTE (rwood @ Wednesday, March 8th, 2006, 3:53 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
lead it into 2 guys who havent shown much aggression...
since no one put a raise in the whole way keep your lead as i wouldnt expect them to wake up now, anyone with the K would have almost def. put a raise in at some point...
check/calling has arguments also as you could induce a bluff from a worse hand
but it is likely that worse hand will call anyways(such as TT)...so dont lose 2 possible bb's
since no one put a raise in the whole way keep your lead as i wouldnt expect them to wake up now, anyone with the K would have almost def. put a raise in at some point...
check/calling has arguments also as you could induce a bluff from a worse hand
but it is likely that worse hand will call anyways(such as TT)...so dont lose 2 possible bb's
I bet.
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.
#4
Posted 08 March 2006 - 02:58 AM
#5
Posted 08 March 2006 - 07:52 AM
yeah, that's the easy part... now, if raised?
call one , even overcall ? 14:1...
call one , even overcall ? 14:1...
#6
Posted 08 March 2006 - 10:03 AM
i check, str8 got there on the turn, and top pair beat you on the river. only thing that didn't get there was the flush and If they were both on a draw one of them got there and the other didn't, and I think it is more likely one of them had a flush draw adn other had KQ. or something like that and i don't think you get paid off by anything but hands that beat you at this point so checking doesn't cost you a bet.
show me yours and I'll show you mind :D
#7
Posted 08 March 2006 - 01:25 PM
QUOTE (Actuary @ Wednesday, March 8th, 2006, 8:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
yeah, that's the easy part... now, if raised?
call one , even overcall ? 14:1...
call one , even overcall ? 14:1...
I don't think it matters much.
QUOTE (Uppie_ @ Wednesday, March 8th, 2006, 11:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i check, str8 got there on the turn, and top pair beat you on the river. only thing that didn't get there was the flush and If they were both on a draw one of them got there and the other didn't, and I think it is more likely one of them had a flush draw adn other had KQ. or something like that and i don't think you get paid off by anything but hands that beat you at this point so checking doesn't cost you a bet.
Weak.
Very weak. No one raised anywhere. A straight on the turn is very unlikely, as is top pair. What's more likely is that you will get a weak call from some crappy pair hand.
#8
Posted 08 March 2006 - 01:42 PM
yeah, I'm b/c 'ing
I want to see what TP didn't raise, or slow played straight with FD's on board.
I love the "doesn't much matter" ..so true. Even though it's aggravating to lose and turns us into wimps
I want to see what TP didn't raise, or slow played straight with FD's on board.
I love the "doesn't much matter" ..so true. Even though it's aggravating to lose and turns us into wimps
#9
Posted 08 March 2006 - 03:50 PM
I agree with all the bet-call advice, although I occasionally wimp out in this situation. Betting is best...
#10
Posted 08 March 2006 - 04:31 PM
It's funny. When I read HH's, I instantly go into weak-passive mode. When I looked at the HH, I was thinking c/c, but when I'm actually playing, I bet hands like this without thinking twice.
I think it's because I'm used to reading NL strategy posts that always end with "and then he sucked out a straight flush to beat my quads. Should I have folded to the river raise?"
I think it's because I'm used to reading NL strategy posts that always end with "and then he sucked out a straight flush to beat my quads. Should I have folded to the river raise?"
Lady luck's my fuck-buddy.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









