Jump to content


River Plan


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 36,830 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thunder Bay, ON

Posted 07 March 2006 - 11:26 PM

Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (9 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

Preflop: Hero is BB with A :icon_suit_heart:, A :icon_suit_diamond:.
1 fold, UTG+1 raises, 3 folds, CO calls, 1 fold, SB calls, Hero 3-bets, UTG+1 calls, CO calls, SB calls.

Flop: (12 SB) 7 :icon_suit_diamond:, 8 :icon_suit_club:, K :icon_suit_diamond: (4 players)
SB checks, Hero bets, UTG+1 folds, CO calls, SB calls.

Turn: (7.50 BB) 6 :icon_suit_club: (3 players)
SB checks, Hero bets, CO calls, SB calls.

River: (10.50 BB) K :icon_suit_heart: (3 players)
SB checks, Hero ....

-----

Give me some feed back guys
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#2 rwood

rwood

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,712 posts
  • Location:Newport Beach, CA

Posted 08 March 2006 - 12:53 AM

lead it into 2 guys who havent shown much aggression...

since no one put a raise in the whole way keep your lead as i wouldnt expect them to wake up now, anyone with the K would have almost def. put a raise in at some point...

check/calling has arguments also as you could induce a bluff from a worse hand

but it is likely that worse hand will call anyways(such as TT)...so dont lose 2 possible bb's

#3 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 36,830 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thunder Bay, ON

Posted 08 March 2006 - 01:32 AM

QUOTE (rwood @ Wednesday, March 8th, 2006, 3:53 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
lead it into 2 guys who havent shown much aggression...

since no one put a raise in the whole way keep your lead as i wouldnt expect them to wake up now, anyone with the K would have almost def. put a raise in at some point...

check/calling has arguments also as you could induce a bluff from a worse hand

but it is likely that worse hand will call anyways(such as TT)...so dont lose 2 possible bb's


I bet.
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#4 screech

screech

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,376 posts

Posted 08 March 2006 - 02:58 AM

QUOTE (Zach6668 @ Wednesday, March 8th, 2006, 2:32 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I bet.


good.

#5 Actuary

Actuary

    .

  • Members
  • 19,026 posts

Posted 08 March 2006 - 07:52 AM

yeah, that's the easy part... now, if raised?

call one , even overcall ? 14:1...

#6 Uppie_

Uppie_

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 431 posts

Posted 08 March 2006 - 10:03 AM

i check, str8 got there on the turn, and top pair beat you on the river. only thing that didn't get there was the flush and If they were both on a draw one of them got there and the other didn't, and I think it is more likely one of them had a flush draw adn other had KQ. or something like that and i don't think you get paid off by anything but hands that beat you at this point so checking doesn't cost you a bet.
show me yours and I'll show you mind :D

#7 screech

screech

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,376 posts

Posted 08 March 2006 - 01:25 PM

QUOTE (Actuary @ Wednesday, March 8th, 2006, 8:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
yeah, that's the easy part... now, if raised?

call one , even overcall ? 14:1...


I don't think it matters much.

QUOTE (Uppie_ @ Wednesday, March 8th, 2006, 11:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i check, str8 got there on the turn, and top pair beat you on the river. only thing that didn't get there was the flush and If they were both on a draw one of them got there and the other didn't, and I think it is more likely one of them had a flush draw adn other had KQ. or something like that and i don't think you get paid off by anything but hands that beat you at this point so checking doesn't cost you a bet.


Weak.

Very weak. No one raised anywhere. A straight on the turn is very unlikely, as is top pair. What's more likely is that you will get a weak call from some crappy pair hand.

#8 Actuary

Actuary

    .

  • Members
  • 19,026 posts

Posted 08 March 2006 - 01:42 PM

yeah, I'm b/c 'ing

I want to see what TP didn't raise, or slow played straight with FD's on board.

I love the "doesn't much matter" ..so true. Even though it's aggravating to lose and turns us into wimps

#9 thecamelot

thecamelot

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 328 posts
  • Location:Vancouver, BC

Posted 08 March 2006 - 03:50 PM

I agree with all the bet-call advice, although I occasionally wimp out in this situation. Betting is best...

#10 iggymcfly

iggymcfly

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,654 posts
  • Location:Missoula, MT
  • Interests:Poker, football, sitting on my ass

Posted 08 March 2006 - 04:31 PM

It's funny. When I read HH's, I instantly go into weak-passive mode. When I looked at the HH, I was thinking c/c, but when I'm actually playing, I bet hands like this without thinking twice.

I think it's because I'm used to reading NL strategy posts that always end with "and then he sucked out a straight flush to beat my quads. Should I have folded to the river raise?"
Lady luck's my fuck-buddy.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users