Jump to content


Bob Stupak Owes You 79k!


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
16 replies to this topic

#1 WYFish

WYFish

    Poker Forum Newbie

  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 07 March 2006 - 01:00 AM

Hey Daniel,
I've been watching High Stakes poker and have been amazed and appalled by the beats you have taken, but nothing was more appalling than Bob Stupak on your repeat "naked nut flush bluff" against F. Deeb. I really think Stupak owes you 79k ...I really think he's what caused the call and little else - from what I saw (I know there is editing) I think his hand he didnt show was 2 spades (since he wasnt playing just taking up space...he folded) when you made your river bet - he slammed his money and reacted totally out of line (as if he folded the spades ) then he made the comment "cause he's trying to win it right here" to Deeb then he got up and steamed away,...Then to add insult to injury he comes back and starts talking about calling the clock - to push a decision - We both know the longer Deeb took , the less likely a call.....Hope you get him to get involved in a pot with you before the show is over -they all cant suckout.....

#2 rogerwilco

rogerwilco

    poker sucks

  • Members
  • 1,974 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vienna

Posted 07 March 2006 - 06:42 AM

QUOTE (WYFish @ Tuesday, March 7th, 2006, 10:00 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hey Daniel,
I've been watching High Stakes poker and have been amazed and appalled by the beats you have taken, but nothing was more appalling than Bob Stupak on your repeat "naked nut flush bluff" against F. Deeb. I really think Stupak owes you 79k ...I really think he's what caused the call and little else - from what I saw (I know there is editing) I think his hand he didnt show was 2 spades (since he wasnt playing just taking up space...he folded) when you made your river bet - he slammed his money and reacted totally out of line (as if he folded the spades ) then he made the comment "cause he's trying to win it right here" to Deeb then he got up and steamed away,...Then to add insult to injury he comes back and starts talking about calling the clock - to push a decision - We both know the longer Deeb took , the less likely a call.....Hope you get him to get involved in a pot with you before the show is over -they all cant suckout.....



Nonsense. Do you really believe, Freddy Deeb bases his decisions on comments of someone like Bob Stupak?
Stupak was certainly acting very weird (and I'd like to read Daniel Negreanus opinion about that), but Deebs call can't possibly have had anything to do with that.

#3 mrdannyg

mrdannyg

    Shufflin'

  • Members
  • 16,194 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 March 2006 - 09:08 AM

QUOTE (rogerwilco @ Tuesday, March 7th, 2006, 9:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Nonsense. Do you really believe, Freddy Deeb bases his decisions on comments of someone like Bob Stupak?
Stupak was certainly acting very weird (and I'd like to read Daniel Negreanus opinion about that), but Deebs call can't possibly have had anything to do with that.


i don't think he bases his decisions on the advice from stupak, but clearly stupak is dumb enough that deeb can take his words and actions at face value. that might have given him more information which might have made him more likely to call.

DN did something questionable in a hand earlier as well - sorry can't remember the exact incident.
Long-term bets:

(2) 76'ers to win title @ 31
Webb Simpson to win US Money Title @ 17
Brandt Snedeker to win US Money Title @ 26
(5) Broncos to win the AFC @ 11
(2.5) Broncos to win the SB @ 21
(2) Bears to win SB @ 42
(0.5) Red Sox to lead AL East @ 6.5
(1.5) White Sox to lead AL Central @ 17.25
Indians to lead AL Central @ 15
Nationals to lead NL East @ 9
(0.5) Marlins to lead NL East @ 6
Padres to lead NL West @ 29
(0.5) Rockies to lead NL West @ 6.5
(0.5) Cardinals to win NL @ 9

#4 WYFish

WYFish

    Poker Forum Newbie

  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 07 March 2006 - 10:57 AM

QUOTE (rogerwilco @ Tuesday, March 7th, 2006, 7:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Nonsense. Do you really believe, Freddy Deeb bases his decisions on comments of someone like Bob Stupak?
Stupak was certainly acting very weird (and I'd like to read Daniel Negreanus opinion about that), but Deebs call can't possibly have had anything to do with that.

In a game of limited information, if you don't think a player is looking for any any ancillary or incidental input to make a decision, including key information about probalities of mucked outs then I hope you're at my table sometime soon.
When playing with kitchen table amatuers, nothing helps an experienced player's bluff more than the subtle oohs, awes and whiperings from mucked players when the flop unfolds and they would of hit.

#5 pezeveng

pezeveng

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 3,692 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:in the freezer

Posted 07 March 2006 - 11:20 AM

I cant believe how tight chan plays. So far in two shows hes played pocket aces twice and kj suited where he got his flush and st8. Must be hard to beat the guy in cash games. I've watched all the shows and I think Farha is the best playing all different types of cards. DN its just one bad beat after another. He lost to the higher str8 and the full boat, hes lucky players didnt buy in for more or he would be down close to a mill. I have a feeling he'll make a comeback in the next show. Also get rid of Stupak hes only taking up space.

#6 MasterLJ

MasterLJ

    Bus Fare Gambler

  • Members
  • 2,576 posts

Posted 07 March 2006 - 02:01 PM

DN unfortunately has no right to be mad at Stupak since DN made a comment about, "everyone does it, so it's okay," when Todd Brunson was mad about players chatting through a hand.

You sow it, you reap it.
Me Blog (Updated: **12/22/2006**)


#7 WYFish

WYFish

    Poker Forum Newbie

  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 07 March 2006 - 02:19 PM

QUOTE (MasterLJ @ Tuesday, March 7th, 2006, 3:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
DN unfortunately has no right to be mad at Stupak since DN made a comment about, "everyone does it, so it's okay," when Todd Brunson was mad about players chatting through a hand.

You sow it, you reap it.

I think talking about possibilities of what hands people may have (when that is simply stating the obvious) is much different then reacting in a way that may imply you mucked cards that could affect probabilities.
On top of that the implied threat of calling the clock - in a cash game when your not even in the hand is poor etiquite at best.

#8 swiftD777

swiftD777

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 154 posts
  • Location:Minneapolis, MN

Posted 07 March 2006 - 02:30 PM

There is so much to learn from Mr. Stupak.

"I never thought much of a female woman poker player until tonight."

-B. Stupak

#9 CodyHartman

CodyHartman

    My Son is More Punk Rawk Then You

  • Members
  • 3,687 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:PDX, Orygun
  • Interests:My new baby boy, my pugs, my awesome wife of 6 years, MMA, pokah, and my nintendo DS.
  • Favorite Poker Game:$.50/1 LHE

Posted 07 March 2006 - 02:34 PM

that dude is scary lookin
Stars: KingOfDaClub
UB & Tilt: CodyHartman

Need rakeback? PM me

#10 MasterLJ

MasterLJ

    Bus Fare Gambler

  • Members
  • 2,576 posts

Posted 07 March 2006 - 03:19 PM

QUOTE (WYFish @ Tuesday, March 7th, 2006, 2:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think talking about possibilities of what hands people may have (when that is simply stating the obvious) is much different then reacting in a way that may imply you mucked cards that could affect probabilities.
On top of that the implied threat of calling the clock - in a cash game when your not even in the hand is poor etiquite at best.


You're splitting hairs and trying to justify what Daniel did. This is exactly why you do not make any distinctions between talking during a hand that you are not involved in. Talking during a hand can be acceptable if it is not poker related. Talking directly about the current hand in any way, shape or form is outright bad form... and DN was condoning it.
Me Blog (Updated: **12/22/2006**)


#11 dxmaster

dxmaster

    Poker Forum Newbie

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 07 March 2006 - 07:13 PM

Freddy is a great player. He made the call because he is a good player. The ex-hotel owner had nothing to do with his decision. He just has very poor etiquette when it comes to the poker table. He really doesnt belong there. Since he got rid of Stupek's Tower (Stratosphere) he's been missing the limelight I think. Thats the only reason why he's there. He's a poor player.

#12 DaBruins

DaBruins

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 755 posts

Posted 10 March 2006 - 03:13 AM

QUOTE (MasterLJ @ Tuesday, March 7th, 2006, 3:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You're splitting hairs and trying to justify what Daniel did. This is exactly why you do not make any distinctions between talking during a hand that you are not involved in. Talking during a hand can be acceptable if it is not poker related. Talking directly about the current hand in any way, shape or form is outright bad form... and DN was condoning it.


you think thats splitting hairs?!? Thats laughable. Talking during a hand and talking about a hand are two completely different matters.

Having said that, i think Deeb makes the same decision either way. At that level all the regular players are smart guys, they dont need someone to tell them that another player could be bluffing when he makes a big bet. I think Deeb just knew Daniel was capable of that play, and Deeb went with his instincts and was probably tired of being bullied out of all his pots.

#13 NoSup4U

NoSup4U

    Making Poppinfresh look like a nit

  • Members
  • 10,674 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Phoenix, AZ
  • Favorite Poker Game:Shorthanded NLHE

Posted 10 March 2006 - 03:21 PM

QUOTE (DaBruins @ Friday, March 10th, 2006, 4:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
you think thats splitting hairs?!? Thats laughable. Talking during a hand and talking about a hand are two completely different matters.


I don't think you understood what he was saying. His point was that, yes, random talking and talking about the hand are different things.

But Daniel had condoned a certain type of talking about the hand earlier, so he shouldn't get upset at what Stupak said. (which to my knowledge he didn't) Just some people here felt it was out of line, which I agree with.

Mark

#14 WayneBullet

WayneBullet

    Poker Forum Newbie

  • Members
  • 29 posts
  • Location:Sioux Falls, SD

Posted 11 March 2006 - 10:43 AM

I read Jenna Jameson's autobiography last year. She was a dancer in Vegas through the late 80's early 90's. She talks about how and Executive of a casino in Vegas used to pay her $1000 a song to brush her hair. I bet it was Stupak. He either was an owner of the Stratosphere or an executive. I can see that guy doing that kind of stuff. She also said the guy would never let him dance for her.

#15 tightass

tightass

    Poker Forum Newbie

  • Members
  • 28 posts
  • Location:Ontario

Posted 11 March 2006 - 10:52 AM

QUOTE (WYFish @ Tuesday, March 7th, 2006, 4:00 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hey Daniel,
I've been watching High Stakes poker and have been amazed and appalled by the beats you have taken, but nothing was more appalling than Bob Stupak on your repeat "naked nut flush bluff" against F. Deeb. I really think Stupak owes you 79k ...I really think he's what caused the call and little else - from what I saw (I know there is editing) I think his hand he didnt show was 2 spades (since he wasnt playing just taking up space...he folded) when you made your river bet - he slammed his money and reacted totally out of line (as if he folded the spades ) then he made the comment "cause he's trying to win it right here" to Deeb then he got up and steamed away,...Then to add insult to injury he comes back and starts talking about calling the clock - to push a decision - We both know the longer Deeb took , the less likely a call.....Hope you get him to get involved in a pot with you before the show is over -they all cant suckout.....


I have also been watching this series and you are right Stupak made me sick in that hand. I also thought the bet was to large. Deeb call was amazing , but he was feeling that he had been robbed by bluffs all night. A smaller bet and shut the dumbass Stupak's mouth and he folds!

QUOTE (pezeveng @ Tuesday, March 7th, 2006, 2:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I cant believe how tight chan plays. So far in two shows hes played pocket aces twice and kj suited where he got his flush and st8. Must be hard to beat the guy in cash games. I've watched all the shows and I think Farha is the best playing all different types of cards. DN its just one bad beat after another. He lost to the higher str8 and the full boat, hes lucky players didnt buy in for more or he would be down close to a mill. I have a feeling he'll make a comeback in the next show. Also get rid of Stupak hes only taking up space.


Chan is the man in this game. His tight play is very profitable at this loose table.

#16 hank213

hank213

    it takes determination to be a drunk

  • Members
  • 6,701 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:a bar or under my desk

Posted 11 March 2006 - 10:52 PM

If stupak was talking like that during a cash game I was in I'd be peeved. Of course Freddy didn't base his decision solely on Stupids...I mean Stupak's comment, but in a cash game any type of read from a known player not involved in a hand factors into your thought process.
Hank's tenure at Soulsuckers, INC, LLC, DBA TBD, had not been long, but it had been distinguished... By drunkenness, hair-trigger violence, and a total lack of performance. I would call it a steady decline in performance, but that would imply that he performed at one point in time. In fact he had not. He was drunk.

QUOTE (Napa_Don @ Monday, August 15th, 2011, 5:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Last week I drink the majority of a twelve pack of light beer out of the cutoff end of a whiffle bat, how's that for cultured, bitches"

#17 13CARDS

13CARDS

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Banned
  • 741 posts
  • Location:PLEASE BAN ME, MODS !!
  • Interests:PLEASE BAN ME, MODS !!<br />PLEASE BAN ME, MODS !!<br />PLEASE BAN ME, MODS !!<br />PLEASE BAN ME, MODS !!<br />PLEASE BAN ME, MODS !!<br /><br />PLEASE BAN ME, MODS !!<br />PLEASE BAN ME, MODS !!<br /><br />PLEASE BAN ME, MODS !!
  • Favorite Poker Game:PLEASE BAN ME, MODS !!

Posted 20 March 2006 - 03:51 PM

Is everyone referring to the hand with Todd and Mimi when Todd asked Mimi how much she had left and DN answered for her. Then Todd asked again and again DN answered (as well as some of the other players). Todd then berated DN saying it was poker etiquette for "50 years" that players not in the hand don't speak.

???
PLEASE BAN ME, MODS!!




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users