pokerplayer24 0 Posted February 28, 2006 Share Posted February 28, 2006 The majority of these hands come from the 2/4 6 max level as I put in a good 5k this weekend upping my 2/4 total to 15k. More or less just looking for major leaks and not going to post win rate as I feel its pretty unimportant.Total Hands 25,882VPIP: 29.46% (7,623 times out of 25,882)VPIP from SB 44% (2,292 out of 5,209)Folded SB to steal 75.04%Folded BB to steal 46.26%Folded BB to steal HU 39.05%Went to showdown 39.99%Won $ at showdown 51.22%Raised preflop 16.92%AFFlop 2.79Turn 2.22River 1.37Total 2.24Folded to river bet40.06% (703 times out of 1,755)When folds handNo fold 24.9% Preflop 59.79% Flop 7.5% Turn 5% River 2.76% Link to post Share on other sites
econ_tim 0 Posted February 28, 2006 Share Posted February 28, 2006 You fold to a river bet much more than I do. Maybe it is because you are playing close to a 30/20 style and I play a 24/16 style.But folding to 40% of river bets still seems high. Perhaps you should fold more turns or call more rivers.Screech might be able to shed some light on this stat. I think he also plays 30/20ish. Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted February 28, 2006 Share Posted February 28, 2006 nothing sticks out to me.Obviously, much more aggressive than I.I certainly disagree that WR is unimportant.Sure, the value at only 25k hands is getting reliable, but still has a lot of error in it. But in the end it's the ONLY Stat that matters. Trying to play to target certain stats is bad. I KNOW YOU are not doing that, just bringing it up. Link to post Share on other sites
pokerplayer24 0 Posted February 28, 2006 Author Share Posted February 28, 2006 nothing sticks out to me.Obviously, much more aggressive than I.I certainly disagree that WR is unimportant.Sure, the value at only 25k hands is getting reliable, but still has a lot of error in it. But in the end it's the ONLY Stat that matters. Trying to play to target certain stats is bad. I KNOW YOU are not doing that, just bringing it up.My winrate is at 5.38bb/100 with it being no higher then 6 at any level and no lower then 4. Dont want to come off as one of those people that thinks that a wr over 5 is anywhere near possible to maintain so wasnt going to post it. Link to post Share on other sites
econ_tim 0 Posted February 28, 2006 Share Posted February 28, 2006 My winrate is at 5.38bb/100 with it being no higher then 6 at any level and no lower then 4. Dont want to come off as one of those people that thinks that a wr over 5 is anywhere near possible to maintain so wasnt going to post it. move upedit: true story - my winrate at 5/10 is 7.5BB/100 over 36 hands. Link to post Share on other sites
pokerplayer24 0 Posted February 28, 2006 Author Share Posted February 28, 2006 move upedit: true story - my winrate at 5/10 is 7.5BB/100 over 36 hands.Sarcasm or seriousness? Link to post Share on other sites
econ_tim 0 Posted February 28, 2006 Share Posted February 28, 2006 Sarcasm or seriousness? both statements are serious - although we can't put tight bounds on your winrate, we can say you are beating 2/4 with probably 99% confidence. and since you've been winning so much your roll is large enough to handle bigger games. so you're giving up winning by staying at 2/4. i say, learn to deal with the 1/3 blind structure. Link to post Share on other sites
pokerkid 0 Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 Anyone else find it interesting that the OP's win (and tie) at SD is so low (barely over 50%) but he folds a ton of rivers?All i can think of is ur either missing a ton of draws or not folding the turn often enough.I don't know exactly what to make of it, but maybe someone else has an opinion... Link to post Share on other sites
econ_tim 0 Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 Anyone else find it interesting that the OP's win (and tie) at SD is so low (barely over 50%) but he folds a ton of rivers? W$SD near 50% is pretty normal Link to post Share on other sites
pokerkid 0 Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 W$SD near 50% is pretty normalMy impression was it's usually around 60% and that 10% difference from optimal has a decent amonunt of statistical significane.Geuss i was wrong. Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 pp24I jsut meant sometimes we emphasis stats too much and are not able to fully comprehend that other styles work, perhapsSo in the final analyis, your WR is all that matters.... asuming it's a true WR and not lucky streaks... and I know that takes time and stats are a way to measure leaks ahead of time...just some posters are too rigid in determing a leaky stat imo Link to post Share on other sites
KramitDaToad 0 Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 My impression was it's usually around 60% and that 10% difference from optimal has a decent amonunt of statistical significane.Geuss i was wrong.60% is way to high. Low 50's is best.For the OP, your WTSD is at the high end. With your fold to river bet @ 40% (which is spot on) it indicates you may be running hot Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now