Qq When Aa Flops
Started by CoranMoran, Feb 24 2006 04:57 PM
11 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 24 February 2006 - 04:57 PM
PokerStars 0.50/1.00 Hold'em (6 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx
Preflop: Hero is MP with Q:diamond:, Q:club:.
1 fold, Hero raises, CO 3-bets, Button calls, 1 fold, BB calls, Hero caps, CO calls, Button calls, BB calls.
Flop: (16.50 SB) A:diamond:, 3:diamond:, A:club: (4 players)
BB checks, Hero bets, CO raises, Button folds, BB folds, Hero ....
Holding a strong pocket pair when an Ace flops is pretty common.
Under normal circumstances, I will call down after a raise from most loose plaers.
And I fold to a raise from a tight player.
This hand added a couple of new aspects.
* Villain 3bet preflop - thus increasing the liklihood that he has an Ace.
* Two Aces came on the flop - thus decreasing the liklihood that he has one.
* Backdoor Flush Draw exists - does this sway the decision much?
Question:
Is this still a purely read dependant situation?
Or do some of you routinely fold or call down here most all of the time?
Please advise.
--cm
Preflop: Hero is MP with Q:diamond:, Q:club:.
1 fold, Hero raises, CO 3-bets, Button calls, 1 fold, BB calls, Hero caps, CO calls, Button calls, BB calls.
Flop: (16.50 SB) A:diamond:, 3:diamond:, A:club: (4 players)
BB checks, Hero bets, CO raises, Button folds, BB folds, Hero ....
Holding a strong pocket pair when an Ace flops is pretty common.
Under normal circumstances, I will call down after a raise from most loose plaers.
And I fold to a raise from a tight player.
This hand added a couple of new aspects.
* Villain 3bet preflop - thus increasing the liklihood that he has an Ace.
* Two Aces came on the flop - thus decreasing the liklihood that he has one.
* Backdoor Flush Draw exists - does this sway the decision much?
Question:
Is this still a purely read dependant situation?
Or do some of you routinely fold or call down here most all of the time?
Please advise.
--cm
#2
Posted 25 February 2006 - 08:01 AM
QUOTE (CoranMoran @ Friday, February 24th, 2006, 4:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
PokerStars 0.50/1.00 Hold'em (6 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx
Preflop: Hero is MP with Q:diamond:, Q:club:.
1 fold, Hero raises, CO 3-bets, Button calls, 1 fold, BB calls, Hero caps, CO calls, Button calls, BB calls.
Flop: (16.50 SB) A:diamond:, 3:diamond:, A:club: (4 players)
BB checks, Hero bets, CO monitor. raises, Button folds, BB folds, Hero ....
Holding a strong pocket pair when an Ace flops is pretty common.
Under normal circumstances, I will call down after a raise from most loose plaers.
And I fold to a raise from a tight player.
This hand added a couple of new aspects.
* Villain 3bet preflop - thus increasing the liklihood that he has an Ace.
* Two Aces came on the flop - thus decreasing the liklihood that he has one.
* Backdoor Flush Draw exists - does this sway the decision much?
Question:
Is this still a purely read dependant situation?
Or do some of you routinely fold or call down here most all of the time?
Please advise.
--cm
Preflop: Hero is MP with Q:diamond:, Q:club:.
1 fold, Hero raises, CO 3-bets, Button calls, 1 fold, BB calls, Hero caps, CO calls, Button calls, BB calls.
Flop: (16.50 SB) A:diamond:, 3:diamond:, A:club: (4 players)
BB checks, Hero bets, CO monitor. raises, Button folds, BB folds, Hero ....
Holding a strong pocket pair when an Ace flops is pretty common.
Under normal circumstances, I will call down after a raise from most loose plaers.
And I fold to a raise from a tight player.
This hand added a couple of new aspects.
* Villain 3bet preflop - thus increasing the liklihood that he has an Ace.
* Two Aces came on the flop - thus decreasing the liklihood that he has one.
* Backdoor Flush Draw exists - does this sway the decision much?
Question:
Is this still a purely read dependant situation?
Or do some of you routinely fold or call down here most all of the time?
Please advise.
--cm
call and fold turn ui.
if the pot was smaller just bet/fold. if he just called you on the flop, i really have no idea what the best line is.
QUOTE ( Barry Greenstein)
Successful gamblers are compulsive winners.
#3
Posted 25 February 2006 - 12:55 PM
If I was in CO's spot, I'd raise a lot of hands that pocket queens are ahead of, think 88-JJ
I think this is a classic WA/WB scenario. If we had a cold-caller on the flop, then I'd release, but since we are HU I think it's best to just check/call down, lose the minimum to Ax but win the maximum from hands that you have severely beat.
If you have a read that your opponent is passive, then yea, it's probably best to fold. If I have any indication that my opponent is aggressive postflop, though, then this is an easy call down for me.
I think this is a classic WA/WB scenario. If we had a cold-caller on the flop, then I'd release, but since we are HU I think it's best to just check/call down, lose the minimum to Ax but win the maximum from hands that you have severely beat.
If you have a read that your opponent is passive, then yea, it's probably best to fold. If I have any indication that my opponent is aggressive postflop, though, then this is an easy call down for me.
#4
Posted 25 February 2006 - 04:08 PM
I'm not folding
#5
Posted 26 February 2006 - 01:21 AM
wow me weak tight i never would have thought...
this a shorthanded thing or are you guys always calling down in situations like this?
this a shorthanded thing or are you guys always calling down in situations like this?
QUOTE ( Barry Greenstein)
Successful gamblers are compulsive winners.
#6
Posted 26 February 2006 - 07:52 AM
QUOTE (antistuff @ Sunday, February 26th, 2006, 1:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
wow me weak tight i never would have thought...
this a shorthanded thing or are you guys always calling down in situations like this?
this a shorthanded thing or are you guys always calling down in situations like this?
People will do crazy shit when the board pairs.
You need a really really solid read to fold anywhere in this hand unless it's two cold to you.
But in this case you're headsup in a HUGE pot where a very decent % of the time villain has 88-JJ, or even KQ.
Have to have to have to call down an unknown.
no set no bet
#7
Posted 26 February 2006 - 01:12 PM
I also felt the need to call down to showdown.
With two Aces on the board, I didn't give folding much thought.
But then entire table began to talk about what a poor play the loose call down was.
That took me off guard and made me wonder.
Either I was playing like a donk...
Or I was at a wonderful table full of them.
--cm
With two Aces on the board, I didn't give folding much thought.
But then entire table began to talk about what a poor play the loose call down was.
That took me off guard and made me wonder.
Either I was playing like a donk...
Or I was at a wonderful table full of them.
--cm
#8
Posted 26 February 2006 - 03:21 PM
buddy list the whole table
no set no bet
#9
Posted 26 February 2006 - 03:26 PM
QUOTE (AlphaOmega @ Saturday, February 25th, 2006, 3:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If I was in CO's spot, I'd raise a lot of hands that pocket queens are ahead of, think 88-JJ
I think this is a classic WA/WB scenario. If we had a cold-caller on the flop, then I'd release, but since we are HU I think it's best to just check/call down, lose the minimum to Ax but win the maximum from hands that you have severely beat.
If you have a read that your opponent is passive, then yea, it's probably best to fold. If I have any indication that my opponent is aggressive postflop, though, then this is an easy call down for me.
I think this is a classic WA/WB scenario. If we had a cold-caller on the flop, then I'd release, but since we are HU I think it's best to just check/call down, lose the minimum to Ax but win the maximum from hands that you have severely beat.
If you have a read that your opponent is passive, then yea, it's probably best to fold. If I have any indication that my opponent is aggressive postflop, though, then this is an easy call down for me.
Are you saying bet/call the flop, and c/c down, or c/c all 3 streets?
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.
#10
Posted 26 February 2006 - 03:42 PM
#11
Posted 27 February 2006 - 03:01 AM
QUOTE (AlphaOmega @ Saturday, February 25th, 2006, 8:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If I was in CO's spot, I'd raise a lot of hands that pocket queens are ahead of, think 88-JJ
I think this is a classic WA/WB scenario. If we had a cold-caller on the flop, then I'd release, but since we are HU I think it's best to just check/call down, lose the minimum to Ax but win the maximum from hands that you have severely beat.
If you have a read that your opponent is passive, then yea, it's probably best to fold. If I have any indication that my opponent is aggressive postflop, though, then this is an easy call down for me.
I think this is a classic WA/WB scenario. If we had a cold-caller on the flop, then I'd release, but since we are HU I think it's best to just check/call down, lose the minimum to Ax but win the maximum from hands that you have severely beat.
If you have a read that your opponent is passive, then yea, it's probably best to fold. If I have any indication that my opponent is aggressive postflop, though, then this is an easy call down for me.
You are right about the WA/WB so the line should actually be call the flop, c/c the turn and b/f the river
#12
Posted 27 February 2006 - 04:45 AM
QUOTE (Zach6668` @ Sunday, February 26th, 2006, 3:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Are you saying bet/call the flop, and c/c down, or c/c all 3 streets?
I'd bet/call the flop, check/call turn, and bet/fold the river.
There's value in a bet on the flop because 88-JJ isn't folding, and probably raising.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









