24 replies to this topic

[DanielNegreanu]

Date Limit Hands ResultJan 15 $50-$100NL 190 -$ 5,923Jan 20 $25-$50NL 51 +$ 667 Jan 20 $50-$100NL 1 -$ 400Jan 20 $100-$200 658 - $10,243Jan 20 $250-$500 601 -$24,038Jan 20 $500-$1000 269 +$33,073Jan 21 $50-100NL 551 +$ 15,780Jan 21 $250-$500 752 -$ 7,601Jan 22 $50-$100NL 164 +$13,863Jan 22 $250-$500 300 +$31,539Jan 23 $50-$100NL 281 +$ 8,296Jan 31 $250-$500 284 +$29,830Feb 3 $250-$500 442 -$13,485 Feb 17 $500-$1000 694 +$35,486Feb 18 $500-$1000 664 -$84,418Feb 19 $50-$100 NL 215 -$3,413Feb 19 $500-$1000 948 $ 744Feb 20 $500-$1000 356 -$25,654Feb 21 $500-$1000 357 -$115,000Feb 27 $500-$1000 332 -$80,844Feb 27 $250-$500 97 +$5,602Feb 28 $250-$500 198 +$22,819Feb 28 $50-$100 NL 279 +$10,552Mar 8 $50-$100 NL 48 +$ 7,906Mar 12 $500-$1000 64 +$4,235Mar 12 $50-$100 NL 182 +$35,784Mar 12 $25-$50 NL 52 -$ 6,222Mar 14 $500-$1000 37 -$ 2,007Mar 14 $50-$100 NL 157 +$3,505Mar 16 $500-$1000 736 -$ 4,820 Mar 17 $500-$1000 281 -$ 1,574Mar 18 $500-$1000 644 -$77,532Mar 21 $100-$200 115 +$3,070Mar 23 $50-$100 NL 61 -$19,953May 17 $25-$50 NL 80 +$5,137Jul 19 $500-$1000 1393 +$6,050Jul 24 $500-$1000 115 +29,949Aug 6 $25-$50 NL 29 +$2,873Aug 7 $50-$100 NL 86 -$11,383Aug 7 $25-$50 NL 95 +$7,973Aug 9 $50-100 NL 276 -$16,393Aug 10 $25-$50 NL 119 -$3,593Aug 11 $50-$100 NL 328 +$25,326Aug 12 $50-$100 NL 70 +$1,162Sep 4 $50-100 NL 219 -$1,460Sep 5 $50-100 NL 156 -$3,126Oct 12 $25-50 NL 89 +$4,638Oct 13 $25-$50 NL 33 -$4,277Oct 14 $50-$100 NL 44 +3,892Totals: 14207 -$173,608Profit Per Hand: -$12.22

[sniper6121]

well atleast its on the positive side.

[Petoria]

Yeah, $20 a hand is cool

[astros11ss]

shrug, decent.

[Leppo]

Is there any place you can read when Daniel is about to play online for a chance to log on and have a look ? Thank you.

[Royal27]

For the month of Feb I'm averaging 49 BB/100 playing PLO. I'm on a sick run. That comes out to $.26 per hand. Daniel barely has me beat... :-)

[Royal27]

Leppo said:

Is there any place you can read when Daniel is about to play online for a chance to log on and have a look ? Thank you.

Just watch the general forum. Daniel posts when he is playing a lot of the time. You can also go look for kidpoker on the high limit fcp tables.

[DanielNegreanu]

Updated March 28th, 2006.

[Flushgarden]

Man....if it's that tough for a pro who is widely considered to be one of the best in the world then I think maybe there's no hope for me to make this a profitable hobby.

[khabbi]

Flushgarden, on Thursday, April 27th, 2006, 12:01 AM, said:

Man....if it's that tough for a pro who is widely considered to be one of the best in the world then I think maybe there's no hope for me to make this a profitable hobby.

Well, you could still make it a profitable hobby. Just don't go playing 50/100NL with the best in the game. I'm sure you can find something better for you in the levels between .01/.02 and 50/100.

[brvheart]

sniper6121, on Saturday, February 18th, 2006, 5:34 AM, said:

well atleast its on the positive side.

It is? That looks like a minus sign to me...

Petoria, on Saturday, February 18th, 2006, 5:43 AM, said:

Yeah, $20 a hand is cool

I do believe he's LOSING $20 a hand... but the total amount is very small compared to his BR, so it doesn't matter.

[rkard]

People aren't wearing their glasses

[Flushgarden]

I do believe the first two posters who were talking about positive results made their comments before Daniel updated with some negative numbers.

Quote

Well, you could still make it a profitable hobby. Just don't go playing 50/100NL with the best in the game. I'm sure you can find something better for you in the levels between .01/.02 and 50/100.

Yes, I know in my life I will probably never play at 50/100...if I do it will be a long time from now and after I've become a much better poker player. But I would think somebody like Daniel would be able to handle himself at any level. Then again in Daniels defense, it's not too big of a sample size and we all can run into unlucky streaks.

[iggymcfly]

Actually, if you look at the results by limit, he's doing fine in the 50/100 NL games. It's those 500/1000 limit games that are giving him trouble.

[gilbertology]

play us in omaha

[DanielNegreanu]

updated.

[DanielNegreanu]

last updated Nov 7th 2006.

[LTLHOMER]

I think this is a pretty tell-tale sign that great players use more than just betting patterns and previous records to make good poker decisions...Daniel is one of the best in the world and he shows this when he plays the real poker game, which is done in person where it's got all the variables involved (people talk, blink, breath, move chips, move hands, etc etc etc). I think Daniel is the best reader in the game and that is a key aspect of his game that he cannot do as much online...that and he probably doesn't get into the game as much when you can't see the people you are playing against...for me, there is nothing like live tournaments...I love that stuff...online poker is something I do when I'm bored and can't just get a game going at 4am in the morning on a Wednesday.I think a player that consistently wins online could not use his style in a live tournament structure (except the wsop main event lol!), and I think the opposite is true as well. Another issue is that I play much higher stakes in live games than I do online, so this might have something to do with the quality of players I run into and how I can adapt my game to the various levels...I play better against better players...against bad players sometimes I am up a creek...I am about a break-even player online but in live tournaments/cash games I end up doing much better...at first I thought it was nothing but the trend continues on...

[Orcasgt22]

DanielNegreanu, on Saturday, February 18th, 2006, 2:07 AM, said:

Date Limit Hands ResultFeb 21 $500-$1000 357 -$115,000

You lose more in 1 day then i make in a year....

[DoinSublime]

Flushgarden, on Friday, April 28th, 2006, 7:30 PM, said:

I do believe the first two posters who were talking about positive results made their comments before Daniel updated with some negative numbers. Yes, I know in my life I will probably never play at 50/100...if I do it will be a long time from now and after I've become a much better poker player. But I would think somebody like Daniel would be able to handle himself at any level. Then again in Daniels defense, it's not too big of a sample size and we all can run into unlucky streaks.

Darnit, another hour wasted. I'll be reading a thread, see Flushgarden's avatar, and then I come to and an hour has mysteriously disappeared....weird.