cash game results 2006
#1
Posted 18 February 2006 - 01:04 AM
Feb 1 2000-4000 6 +$69,000
Mar 19 4000-8000 8.5 +$25,000
Mar 20 3000-6000 4 +$121,000
Mar 21 3000-6000 3 +$146,000
Mar 21 4000-8000 4.5 -$310,000
Mar 29 4000-8000 5 +$ 43,000
Apr 10 300-600NL 14 +$174,500
Apr 11 300-600NL 14 -$505,100
Apr 11 200-400NL 3 +$97,500
Apr 13 1500-3000 4.5 +$90,700
Apr 15 4000-8000 12 +$591,000
Apr 17 4000-8000 2.5 -$204,000
Apr 17 2000-4000 3 +$ 34,000
May 18 3000-6000 4 -$ 39,000
May 18 4000-8000 3 +$134,500
May 25 4000-8000 6 -$ 64,000
May 26 4000-8000 9 +$528,000
May 27 4000-8000 7 +$252,000
May 29 4000-8000 21 - $190,000
May 31 4000-8000 4.5 +$ 13,000
Jun 06 4000-8000 1.5 +$210,000
Jul 21 4000-8000 8 +$462,000
Jul 24 4000-8000 21 -$1,279,000
Oct 11 300-600NL 11 +$21,200
Oct 12 300-600NL 3 +$71,000
Oct 30 2000-4000 6 -$69,500
Totals: 185 +$422,800
Hourly Rate 2006: +$2285.41
All-Time Results since 2005:
Totals: 381 +$735,900
Hourly Rate: $1931.50
PROPS Lifetime: +$183,600

#2
Posted 18 February 2006 - 02:32 AM
#3
Posted 18 February 2006 - 09:08 AM
Props 2006 -$81,000
props -ev
#4
Posted 07 March 2006 - 12:52 AM
I've been watching High Stakes poker and have been amazed and appalled by the beats you have taken, but nothing was more appalling than Bob Stupak on your repeat "naked nut flush bluff" against F. Deeb. I really think Stupak owes you 79k ...I really think he's what caused the call and little else - from what I saw (I know there is editing) I think his hand he didnt show was 2 spades (since he wasnt playing just taking up space...he folded) when you made your river bet - he slammed his money and reacted totally out of line (as if he folded the spades ) then he made the comment "cause he's trying to win it right here" to Deeb then he got up and steamed away,...Then to add insult to injury he comes back and starts talking about calling the clock - to push a decision - We both know the longer Deeb took , the less likely a call.....In short I'm sorry and what a jerk!
#5
Posted 16 March 2006 - 12:51 PM
whatever
#6
Posted 28 March 2006 - 03:48 PM

#7
Posted 14 April 2006 - 04:39 AM

#8
Posted 16 April 2006 - 04:19 PM
For all things poker in Los Angeles
#9
Posted 17 April 2006 - 07:54 AM
Apr 15 4000-8000 12 +$591,000
Wow almost a 600k session, i can't wait to read about that in his blog.
#10
Posted 18 April 2006 - 04:41 AM

#11
Posted 18 April 2006 - 10:41 AM
The relativity of all these sessions are sickening. You have won and lost more in one session then I will make in 8 years of my current 40 hour a week job. Crimeny!
#12
Posted 18 April 2006 - 03:20 PM
The relativity of all these sessions are sickening. You have won and lost more in one session then I will make in 8 years of my current 40 hour a week job. Crimeny!
if only dna4ever was paid per post.................
#13
Posted 18 April 2006 - 08:45 PM
The relativity of all these sessions are sickening. You have won and lost more in one session then I will make in 8 years of my current 40 hour a week job. Crimeny!
The reason I decided to add a post is so that it highlights the forum from the lobby. This way, people know that there is something new in here since the last time they checked.

#14
Posted 20 April 2006 - 05:12 AM
except for the + and -, and the decimals aren't in the same spots.
Other than that, identical
#15
Posted 25 April 2006 - 10:29 AM
If that happens can I somehow get a job in the marketing department?
Okay so I'm just messing around but seriously owning a pro team would be awesome.
Fetish porn, mama's boy, Magic the Gathering?
#16
Posted 11 May 2006 - 08:41 PM
#17
Posted 15 May 2006 - 05:33 PM
Does it concern you that almost all of yours wins are under 100k, while your losses are over 200k - even though the wins are more frequent than the losses? Or is it just cards being cards?
#18
Posted 19 May 2006 - 06:13 PM

#19
Posted 19 May 2006 - 06:50 PM
Nice win last night!
#20
Posted 20 May 2006 - 07:14 AM
"The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected." G.K. Chesterson 1900
timwakefield, on 18 April 2012 - 10:38 AM, said:
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users









