superbowl: the fix was in
#1
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:27 PM
Frankly, it would take a TON of convincing that it's even possible that the refs just "randomly" blew that many calls against Seattle.
Normally I'm not too big on conspiracy theories, but I am wholeheartedly convinced that this game was fixed.

#2
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:28 PM
#4
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:30 PM
#5
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:30 PM
There's already 30 threads on this subject... not one on the faked moon landing, though.
#6
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:32 PM
There's already 30 threads on this subject... not one on the faked moon landing, though.
Which, by the way, is more likely
#7
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:33 PM
Seriously though, it wasn't rigged. The officiating was pretty bad but not unprecedented. You're starting to sound like Tritz.
#8
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:33 PM
Frankly, it would take a TON of convincing that it's even possible that the refs just "randomly" blew that many calls against Seattle.
Normally I'm not too big on conspiracy theories, but I am wholeheartedly convinced that this game was fixed.
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! To all you Steelers fans..this is a MAJOR blow to your argument!! The person for whom this forum is (dedicated?/created for....whatever) just stated what pretty much every non-Steeler fan could see. Hell yeah.
Five years in the making
#9
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:36 PM
#10
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:40 PM
#11
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:41 PM
I'll assume that is a joke. That or you didn't watch the game????
Five years in the making
#12
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:43 PM
Unless you decide to count about four or five touchdowns that were erased by the refs.
Honestly dude, I'm not anti-Steelers or even pro-Seattle, but as an objective observer if you watch that game and all of the replays you'll become very suspicious.
I even saw "tells" from the refs. There was one call, where Hasselback fumbled and was CLEARLY touched on the way down, yet the refs were trying SO HARD to call it a fumble. It was as clear as day, but it took these guys forever to finally say, "No fumble."
There was shady business going on in this game, I'm dead serious. I've never said this about any other game in any sport, ever. There was cheating going on.
That's not to say that Pittsburgh couldn't have won without it, but they didn't. I'm totally convinced.

#13
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:43 PM
Frankly, it would take a TON of convincing that it's even possible that the refs just "randomly" blew that many calls against Seattle.
Normally I'm not too big on conspiracy theories, but I am wholeheartedly convinced that this game was fixed.
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! To all you Steelers fans..this is a MAJOR blow to your argument!! The person for whom this forum is (dedicated?/created for....whatever) just stated what pretty much every non-Steeler fan could see. Hell yeah.
lol... yes, a true expert has exposed the truth.
#14
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:44 PM
I'll assume that is a joke. That or you didn't watch the game????
Perhaps he meant the inability to convert that offensive yardage into points. No doubt they got screwed on the officiating, but that wasn't the reason they lost. And it most definitely was not rigged. If anything it is -EV for the NFL for Pittsburgh to win because it takes more focus away from their golden boy Patriots.
#15
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:45 PM
I'll assume that is a joke. That or you didn't watch the game????
I'll assume that that was a question, even though it doesn't seem like it was. No, I wasn’t joking. Do you feel Pittsburgh was getting run over, but ghastly officiating kept pinning them back?
#16
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:46 PM
Unless you decide to count about four or five touchdowns that were erased by the refs.
Bahahahahahaha!
#17
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:46 PM
I'm waiting for the big <SW>.
#18
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:49 PM
I'll assume that is a joke. That or you didn't watch the game????
Perhaps he meant the inability to convert that offensive yardage into points. No doubt they got screwed on the officiating, but that wasn't the reason they lost. And it most definitely was not rigged. If anything it is -EV for the NFL for Pittsburgh to win because it takes more focus away from their golden boy Patriots.
Who said anything about the NFL being involved in the scandal? I don't think the NFL had anything to do with it, but I'd love to put those refs through a lie detector test and see how they fare. They had tells. Totally scared, totally uncomfortable, and they looked like they were lying.

#19
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:51 PM
I'll assume that is a joke. That or you didn't watch the game????
Perhaps he meant the inability to convert that offensive yardage into points. No doubt they got screwed on the officiating, but that wasn't the reason they lost. And it most definitely was not rigged. If anything it is -EV for the NFL for Pittsburgh to win because it takes more focus away from their golden boy Patriots.
Who said anything about the NFL being involved in the scandal? I don't think the NFL had anything to do with it, but I'd love to put those refs through a lie detector test and see how they fare. They had tells. Totally scared, totally uncomfortable, and they looked like they were lying.
I just spit Yoohoo all over my monitor. You owe me $600.
#20
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:52 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









