econ_tim 0 Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 PokerStars 2/4 Hold'em (6 handed) converterPreflop: Hero is BB with [3s], [8s]. UTG calls, MP calls, 2 folds, SB calls, Hero calls, UTG calls.Flop: (12 SB) [2s], [Ah], [5s] (4 players)SB bets, Hero calls, UTG calls, MP calls.Turn: (12 BB) [8d] (4 players)SB bets, Hero calls, UTG folds, MP calls.River: (15 BB) [9d] (3 players)SB bets, Hero folds, MP calls.Final Pot: 17 BB Link to post Share on other sites
PoppinFresh 0 Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 Fold pre-flop?I would cap the flop, the rest looks standard. Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Zach6668 Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 Preflop is meh. It's gonna be 4 handed, so you are basically getting 7-1 on the call. We can't assume MP is gonna donk raise preflop here. So it's an ok preflop call, IMO.I would consider capping flop as well, MP and SB aren't going anywhere, but I suppose going for UTG's overcall is just the same.Rest is standard. Link to post Share on other sites
TheCinciKid 0 Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 I fold pre-flop. I'll generally complete out of the SB with this hand, but I not call a raise from the BB. I know the odds are essentially the same, but the difference I see, and I think it's a big one, is that if I complete out of the SB, no one has shown any strength and I'm far more likely to have decent equity than I am if someone has raised and there could very easily be hands out there that I have way less equity against. Link to post Share on other sites
Don Giovanni 0 Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 i would fold preflop there Link to post Share on other sites
greatwhite 0 Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 Fold preflop, cap the flop, call the turn, and fold on the river. Link to post Share on other sites
WonderfulSplash 0 Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 Fold preflop, cap the flop, call the turn, and fold on the river.Why would you want to raise the turn and drive out likely callers (and your equity edge)? Link to post Share on other sites
PoppinFresh 0 Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 Fold preflop, cap the flop, call the turn, and fold on the river.Why would you want to raise the turn and drive out likely callers (and your equity edge)?? :? 8) Link to post Share on other sites
amarillotg 0 Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 pre-flop is fine.cap the flop though. Link to post Share on other sites
Abbaddabba 0 Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 On what grounds can we say that preflop is fine?Is there any detailed data to suggest that it is? Or are we basing it on intuition alone? Anyways, for the turn...The turn is weird. The pot is pretty big, and we have 17 likely outs to improve against TPTK. We dont have to get bigger pairs to fold often to make it a really effective raise.We also potentially clean up quite a few of our outs by raising. Obviously we arent getting folds from better flush draws, but pairs with gutshots fold; probalby cleaning up as many as 3 to 4 cards. If SB is playing a nut flush draw aggressively and we get bigger pairs (and as much as an ace)to fold the turn, we can take the pot unimproved too. Link to post Share on other sites
greatwhite 0 Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 Fold preflop, cap the flop, call the turn, and fold on the river.Why would you want to raise the turn and drive out likely callers (and your equity edge)?I said call the turn dude. Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 On what grounds can we say that preflop is fine?Is there any detailed data to suggest that it is? Â Or are we basing it on intuition alone? Â .you might be the most unintentionally annoying poster.if not, then it's intentionalno offense.********************btw, preflop is almost always 7:1.I think Timmy can handle that.If its -EV it's not by much.For most of you demanding he folds Pre-FLop, I would to if I were you. Link to post Share on other sites
Abbaddabba 0 Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 If 9 people limp to you and you have suited rags on the button, do you limp because you're getting (more than) 10:1? Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 If 9 people limp to you and you have suited rags on the button, do you limp because you're getting (more than) 10:1?I doubt it. Link to post Share on other sites
Abbaddabba 0 Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 preflop is 10.5:1. I think Timmy can handle that. If its -EV it's not by much.(this time it's intentional) Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 preflop is 10.5:1. Â I think Timmy can handle that. Â If its -EV it's not by much.(this time it's intentional)you lost me Link to post Share on other sites
PoppinFresh 0 Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 preflop is 10.5:1. Â I think Timmy can handle that. Â If its -EV it's not by much.(this time it's intentional)you lost me9 limpers+sb+bb...I guess we like our 12 handed tables. I'm not complaining though :-)Oh, and I still think pre-flop sucks, 38s is an awful hand. Link to post Share on other sites
Abbaddabba 0 Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 Yeah, im a bit slow.But the point is that having a high ratio like that isnt really a good reason to call if it's primarily a reflection of how many hands you're facing. Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 Yeah, im a bit slow.But the point is that having a high ratio like that isnt really a good reason to call if it's primarily a reflection of how many hands you're facing.my point was not that the pf call was good..but more that it's pretty silly that it's noted in almost all responses.Zach got it right.Tim is not beyond reproach, but it's really a waste to emphasis the preflop play here.Calling getting 7:1 against 3 opponents is not the same as calling getting 7:1 against 7 opponents. That's not important anyway. Link to post Share on other sites
PoppinFresh 0 Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 Yeah, im a bit slow.But the point is that having a high ratio like that isnt really a good reason to call if it's primarily a reflection of how many hands you're facing.my point was not that the pf call was good..but more that it's pretty silly that it's noted in almost all responses.Zach got it right.Tim is not beyond reproach, but it's really a waste to emphasis the preflop play here.Calling getting 7:1 against 3 opponents is not the same as calling getting 7:1 against 7 opponents. That's not important anyway.Huh? It's in no way a waste to respond to every street in a post. No idea what you're thinking here. Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 generally too much discussion on preflop.I can't bring much more advanced knowledge, because I don't have it..but I wish we didn't worry about whether Tim calls here or not and spent more time on other pieces..and that goes for other posts..that's all Link to post Share on other sites
Abbaddabba 0 Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 I made like one comment about preflop, and a whole paragraph about the turn. ...so about that turn.How about raising it? Link to post Share on other sites
econ_tim 0 Posted February 5, 2006 Author Share Posted February 5, 2006 yes, i should cap the flop.i know what i was thinking at the time, but it was wrong.i could raise the turn for a free showdown, but i really don't think my 8s are good often enough justify putting in more chips before i improve.as for clearing up outs, i really don't see it. the only shot is if i raise and someone folds a 4 and a 3 hits the river, but this is really unlikely so i don't think it justifies raising either. Link to post Share on other sites
Abbaddabba 0 Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 i could raise the turn for a free showdown, but i really don't think my 8s are good often enough justify putting in more chips before i improve.17 likely outs. If you get even one cold caller and a call from the bettor, it's basically for value unless someone has a high flush draw or a set. If you get folds, you potentially clean up quite a few cards.If SB is pushing hard with a high flush draw, we can potentially get pairs that are beating us to fold behind. Link to post Share on other sites
econ_tim 0 Posted February 5, 2006 Author Share Posted February 5, 2006 17 likely outs. If you get even one cold caller and a call from the bettor, it's basically for value unless someone has a high flush draw or a set. If you get folds, you potentially clean up quite a few cards.If SB is pushing hard with a high flush draw, we can potentially get pairs that are beating us to fold behind.i'd have no problem raising this in position, but since i'm pushing a slim equity edge if there are three to the river, i need to be pretty sure there will be at least one cold caller. i don't think people like to cold call turn bets often enough for me to value raise. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now