Jump to content


moving up limits


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 AvoidReality

AvoidReality

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 264 posts
  • Location:Chesterfield, England
  • Interests:Poker, Rock, Punk and Metal Music, movies, hanging out with friends

Posted 25 January 2006 - 09:59 AM

Hey all

As a few may know im actually a no Limit player ($5/$10) and i really want to start learning limit. I've started at $1/$2 and after 10300 hands im at BB1.60/100, is this enough hands played and a good enough rate too move up to $2/$4 now?

Many thanks
Growing Old Is Mandatory, Growing UP However, Is Optional

#2 AlphaOmega

AlphaOmega

    Poker Forum Almighty

  • Members
  • 1,757 posts
  • Location:Out of context
  • Interests:Being good at poker

Posted 25 January 2006 - 10:21 AM

Yea, go ahead.

The limits are fairly similar in the quality of player, betting structure, etc., and the fact that you are beating 1/2 should translate to you beating 2/4.

I would recommend reading SSHE because there are a lot of concepts in there that should increase your win-rate, assuming you haven't read it already.

Posting/critiquing hands in this forum will also key you in on some of the aspects that change when the betting structure is changed from NL to FL. I'm also a convert NL player and these boards have helped improve my overall game tremendously.

#3 PoppinFresh

PoppinFresh

    Baking up Tasty Delights

  • Members
  • 1,587 posts

Posted 25 January 2006 - 01:48 PM

I would probably jump straight to 5/10 if I were you. Definitely 2/4 though.

#4 Actuary

Actuary

    .

  • Members
  • 19,026 posts

Posted 25 January 2006 - 02:10 PM

you wr is too close to 0 to know if you are beating 1/2.
that notwithstanding whatever you true wr is at 1/2, you can probably do about the same at 2/4
personally my winrate is 12x higher at 2/4.

but party 1/2 was an anomaly for me.

if you played 1/2 with $600, and won $320 (my math right?) you don't have enough to play 2/4.
at least if your not supplementing the bankroll

#5 econ_tim

econ_tim

    forum explorer

  • Members
  • 4,901 posts
  • Location:uncharted waters

Posted 25 January 2006 - 02:45 PM

QUOTE (Actuary)
you wr is too close to 0 to know if you are beating 1/2.
that notwithstanding whatever you true wr is at 1/2, you can probably do about the same at 2/4
personally my winrate is 12x higher at 2/4.

but party 1/2 was an anomaly for me.

if you played 1/2 with $600, and won $320 (my math right?) you don't have enough to play 2/4.
at least if your not supplementing the bankroll


i think he has the BR if he used to play $5/$10NL (unless he went busto). go ahead and play $2/$4 if you've got the cash. the tables can be looser because the bonus whores love $1/$2, and they are notoriously rockish.

#6 Actuary

Actuary

    .

  • Members
  • 19,026 posts

Posted 25 January 2006 - 02:47 PM

is that Bonus whore /12 rockish thing true for all sites? or just party.

speedz has made a home at 1/2.

good point on BR..

But my point was along the lines of, I like to build my BR thru playing. Using a NL BR is "cheating" smile.gif

#7 econ_tim

econ_tim

    forum explorer

  • Members
  • 4,901 posts
  • Location:uncharted waters

Posted 25 January 2006 - 02:48 PM

QUOTE (Actuary)
is that Bonus censored /12 rockish thing true for all sites? or just party.


i don't know. they do some special nit math to figure what level clears the bonus for the least amount of rake.

#8 AshleyC

AshleyC

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 212 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 25 January 2006 - 03:07 PM

I'm also a convert from NL and am absolutely loving limit.

I'd be wary about moving up, as with the higher standard of play you may struggle to maintain a +ve win rate moving up. I'd read SSHE and Lee Jones to try and up your win rate at $1/2. I've learnt alot from these books and this forum in quite a short time.

#9 Guest_Zach6668_*

Guest_Zach6668_*
  • Guests

Posted 25 January 2006 - 03:15 PM

1/2 sucks. Play 2/4. AINEC.

#10 TheCinciKid

TheCinciKid

    Micro Limit Superstar

  • Members
  • 3,452 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the home of world famous fried chicken
  • Interests:Poker, Baseball, Poker, The Bengals, Poker, Golf, Poker, Movies, Poker, Fantasy Sports, and a little Politics and Current Events.
  • Favorite Poker Game:Limit Hold'em

Posted 25 January 2006 - 05:09 PM

I dunno about the least amount of rake, but 1/2 does clear bonuses fastest. I think the pot gets raked at $5 and it's pretty easy to get there at 1/2. It also gets raked at $5 in .5/1, which doesn't happen nearly as often. I know the number becomes higher at 2/4, but I don't remember what it is off the top of my head. Still though, less raked pots at 2/4.

Maybe that's why I find 1/2 especially frustrating, but I definitely prefer 2/4.
"If you're too careful, your whole life can become a ****in' grind." - Mike McDermott, Rounders

my (resurrected) poker blog:
http://cincikid.blogspot.com

#11 Abbaddabba

Abbaddabba

    breaking even like it's 1999

  • Members
  • 5,225 posts

Posted 25 January 2006 - 10:25 PM

The question will always be, how certain do you want to be?

Considering you have a bankroll for 5/10NL, the answer is probably "certain enough"




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users