Not interested in the site's interface, bonus', support, etc... I'm looking for the worst (inexperienced) players.Any opinions?
which site has the worst players?
Started by jaco70, Feb 20 2005 08:15 PM
7 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 20 February 2005 - 08:15 PM
#2
Posted 20 February 2005 - 10:45 PM
Party.
#3
Posted 21 February 2005 - 08:53 AM
Party and pacific in my opinion. I like Party the best. Pacific has garbage software.
#4
Posted 21 February 2005 - 11:44 AM
party, hands down
#5
Posted 21 February 2005 - 11:54 AM
you'd think it'd be UB with all those players trying to be Phil Hellmuth.
#6
Posted 21 February 2005 - 12:41 PM
Nah, UB actually isn't that bad. I play only .5/1 NL so I can only speak on that. On those tables, you'll get some fish but not nearly as much as on Party.
#7
Posted 21 February 2005 - 04:58 PM
Almost all the sites I've played on have pretty poor 7-stud players, but it can backfire. I had aces up on party by 5th street and this one guy kept playing me and beat me with a flush that he got with the last 5 cards. I lost $35 on that one pot, I was so pissed.
#8
Posted 21 February 2005 - 09:13 PM
I play primarily at UB - like the interface the best, but find it totally true about the stud games. My stud game's casino tested (more than 5 times) but I have trouble at low limits online. There's fish, but you need the bankroll.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









