hand analysis please

[no not baxter 0]

Well, this was the fifth hand of a $20+2 tournament on stars. I know my all in call on the river was bad, but I didnt think he represented the Ace. Could you see what I did wrong/right on all parts of the hand. Seat #5 is the buttonSeat 1: RoStacks (1680 in chips) Seat 2: RealyBigDady (1380 in chips) Seat 3: lawkid21 (1280 in chips) Seat 4: austexlady (1460 in chips) Seat 5: moneyinbag (1460 in chips) Seat 6: SouthPaw364 (1400 in chips) Seat 7: ZUBA 17 (1500 in chips) Seat 8: bgDogg (1260 in chips) Seat 9: sukibirdie (2080 in chips) SouthPaw364: posts small blind 10ZUBA 17: posts big blind 20*** HOLE CARDS ***Dealt to moneyinbag [Kc Qc]bgDogg: calls 20sukibirdie: calls 20RoStacks: folds RealyBigDady: calls 20lawkid21: calls 20austexlady: folds moneyinbag: raises 120 to 140SouthPaw364: calls 130ZUBA 17: folds bgDogg: calls 120sukibirdie: calls 120RealyBigDady: folds lawkid21: folds *** FLOP *** [Jc Tc 2c]SouthPaw364: bets 80bgDogg: folds sukibirdie: folds moneyinbag: raises 120 to 200SouthPaw364: calls 120*** TURN *** [Jc Tc 2c] [4c]SouthPaw364: checks moneyinbag: checks *** RIVER *** [Jc Tc 2c 4c] [4d]SouthPaw364: bets 1060 and is all-inmoneyinbag: calls 1060*** SHOW DOWN ***SouthPaw364: shows [Td Th] (a full house, Tens full of Fours)moneyinbag: shows [Kc Qc] (a flush, King high)SouthPaw364 collected 3140 from pot*** SUMMARY ***Total pot 3140 | Rake 0 Board [Jc Tc 2c 4c 4d]Seat 1: RoStacks folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 2: RealyBigDady folded before FlopSeat 3: lawkid21 folded before FlopSeat 4: austexlady folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 5: moneyinbag (button) showed [Kc Qc] and lost with a flush, King highSeat 6: SouthPaw364 (small blind) showed [Td Th] and won (3140) with a full house, Tens full of FoursSeat 7: ZUBA 17 (big blind) folded before FlopSeat 8: bgDogg folded on the FlopSeat 9: sukibirdie folded on the FlopThanks,Baxter

[fckthis 0]

Post in a better format. Way too hard to read and comprehend. Thanks.

[SFkid 0]

I think u played it fine. You should have bet more on the flop and bet on the turn to see where he was at.On the river you could make a case for either calling or folding.It is tough to figure out without some previous hands to go off of.

[NarSARSsist 0]

[btw, don't post the results, nor clues that give away the results, otherwise it might influence people when they're giving opinions. After all, hindsight is 20/20]I think you really have to bet this turn. By checking, you have no idea what you're letting through. You could be letting through a J with a medium club, or you could have let an ace check it to you. It's hard to believe the guy had an ace with the way the hand played out. However, what if he bets, say, 350, 450ish? Would you believe he had an ace then? It's only the 5th hand of the tourney, so I really don't think you have enough info from the first 4 hands [especially when he has 1400, so he probably never got deeply involved in a hand]. It isn't impossible that he bet at the flop with the ace of clubs on a nut flush draw, especially when it's only 80, and then merely calling your raise. Checking that nut flush on the turn to you wouldn't be bad either, so w/o betting, I don't think you would know if he had that ace, and the biggest problem is if he makes a bet on the river that matches what you believe he'd bet with if he did have the ace. He could be bluffing then, or he might not be, but you wouldn't know.