wrto4556 said:
Next time, don't post the results. You played the hand perfectly...people are just saying that no because they know the guy sucked out on you.PS. You played them perfect
WRTO's dead on. I think we should adopt a 2+2-like "hide or wait to post" the results, because those taint thinking.The critique of the reasoning should be based on whether the blinds are sufficient to warrant stealing 5 limps, liklihood of each different size bet being called by the limper, limping standards vs. calling standards, relative stack sizes, playing for survival vs. victory (structure sounds like a survival structire), what would pay off an overpair postflop (do they marry TPTK?)As it shook out, being called for your whole stack as a 4.5-1 favorite, that also cannot be denied, but we're missing info: Stack sizes, willingness of the big stack to gamble to knock people out, what people limp with, that whole spiel I dictated above. However, the BB's call with 99 for all your chips is not neccesarily an indicator that you played the hand well; the desired outcome achieved here could as easily be a result of the deck and the BB's sudden lapse of judgement. You don't know at decision time that anyone will call, especially if you're massively overbetting the pot, and the BB's decision is independent of your . An opponent making a bigger mistake doesn't make your initial play neccesarily correct. Personally, I'd try to take a line where I get heads-up with one person (if reraised, go all in PF) for a pot-sized or slightly bigger raise (here I think I make it 9xBB to go), see if they can hit a pair, and pay off a big flop bet from my overpair. If they flop 2 pair, or get themselves a set, I know that's a risk I take, but when I have bullets, I want to get a whole stack without getting too cutesy (79o isn't gonna beat me. KJs, maybe). You did succeed in that with the BB's call; however, let's look at that more objectively as well.Also, be sensitive to all the factors; while the information I asked for above isn't in your post, you seem to express that it's not running through your mind either. The key is to follow the flow of the table and the stacks, the positions, the previous play, etc. The AA you were squeezing is only 1 factor in a hand; even moreso in tournaments than in cash games, though both need sensitivity to outside factors. That way you'll both improve your technical play, and allow us to help you further by detailing those factors and those reads that will enable us to provide truly constructive thought and reasoning.Also, anyone who wants to limit their losses with aces should tell the poker gods to ship all those bullets over to me. I'll take them.