UTG is LAG, rest of table is fairly tight.Full Tilt - $50+5 NLH S&G, 7 handedBB: (t2,850)UTG: (t3,355)MP1: (t2,455)MP2: (t870)CO: (t1,000)Button: (t955)SB: Hero (t2,015), Dealt [T :diamond: T :spade:]Preflop:UTG raises to 350, MP1 calls 350, 2 folds, button calls 350, Hero raises to 2,015, and is all in...Anyone hate it?
0
super squeeze - full tilt $50+5 s&g
Started by mk, Nov 28 2005 01:44 PM
3 replies to this topic
#2
Pupsta
-
- Members
- 8,419 posts
FCPHA Chauffeur
- Location:Vegas baby!
Posted 28 November 2005 - 06:45 PM
blinds are?if the blinds are 40/80, i hate it. blinds of 60/120+, i love it.in the end, unless utg had a monster, i can just about predict how the hand went out....utg folds, mp1 folds, button calls on the shortstack and you're either dominating or flipping vs something stupid like KQ.
#3
-
- Guests
Posted 29 November 2005 - 08:31 AM
yeah it totally depends on what the blinds are. Like the earlier guy said with low blinds I don't like it, because you can be patient, and there may be better spots to get your money in. Also it depends what type of tourney player you are, if you are the type who doesn't mind coin flips in the first hour than yes moving in is definetely the move. Also if the blinds are high then you absolutely make this move. There's alot of money in that pot already, and your hand is pretty solid.Seems like a reasonably straight-forward analysis...so what happened?
#4
mk
-
- Members
- 9,853 posts
nord-américain racaille
Posted 29 November 2005 - 09:49 AM
yeah, blinds were 60/120... good call on results, pupsta. folded around to button, who called with AT, and my hand held up. I wonder how many of the other initial callers had an ace as well.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
