Jump to content


a bunch of home game superstars @ the wsop lastnight


  • Please log in to reply
37 replies to this topic

#1 KKsuited

KKsuited

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 262 posts
  • Location:Atlanta
  • Interests:Poker

Posted 16 November 2005 - 11:57 AM

Andrew Black is a pretty good player and Tex Barch looked like he knew what he was doing, but everyone else looked like they just walked out of a home game in Marietta.Even Hechem looked like a rookie to me. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying I'm better than any of them, I just expect a little more at the WSOP Final Table.The guy who got second made a joke of the entire WSOP. Pretty hard to talk about how skilled it is, great players, etc when this guy clearly makes a joke of it. Pretty much admitted he stunk and was just there to have fun. Made it look like the World Series of Bingo to me.I give the final table a big fat BOOOOOO!JMO.
www.thebetdoctor.com

#2 Stylin_Fish

Stylin_Fish

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,035 posts

Posted 16 November 2005 - 11:58 AM

Yeah, Mike Matusow is definately a home-game donkey.
IPB Image

#3 PMJackson21

PMJackson21

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,942 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Jose, Ca

Posted 16 November 2005 - 12:03 PM

KKsuited said:

Tex Barch looked like he knew what he was doing,.
Of course he did; he took me out on day 2. :-) I think I saw him use my stack as an ante once.Patrick

#4 ajs510

ajs510

    Resident Evil

  • Members
  • 24,155 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 16 November 2005 - 12:04 PM

I really enjoyed the final table, personally. Seeing Scott Lazar self destruct after those could-have-been quad aces was just painful, but I really enjoyed Hachem, Dannenmann, Kanter, Barch and Black. Did anyone else notice Tex Barch whispering this year's equivalent of "Bust this Motherfu[/size]ck[size=8]er" into Joe Hachem's ear?

#5 Longshanks

Longshanks

    what the duece is this?

  • Members
  • 2,650 posts
  • Location:Arlington-Dallas,Texas
  • Interests:History, Politics

Posted 16 November 2005 - 12:11 PM

what did barch say to hachem, and I liked dannenmann, he is entertaining

#6 ajs510

ajs510

    Resident Evil

  • Members
  • 24,155 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 16 November 2005 - 12:16 PM

Longshanks said:

what did barch say to hachem, and I liked dannenmann, he is entertaining
You couldn't hear it, I think Barch had his hand over the microphone. Guaranteed it was something on the order of Arieh's advice to Williams last year though...I like Dannenmann too, he was the perfect WSOP rookie. Not a co[/size]cky[size=8] arrogant jerk, didn't take himself too seriously, entertained the crowd and his fellow players, and was gracious in defeat. Everyone who qualifies for the tourney next year could take a lesson.

#7 Randy Reed

Randy Reed

    Words up!

  • Members
  • 7,916 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 16 November 2005 - 12:38 PM

The surprising thing to me was that they only showed 1 hand after it got down to the final 2. I thought they played heads up for a number of hours before Danneman made the bad call. I remember him just saying he was very tired and misread his cards, thinking he had a straight and they didn't mention any of it. The whole thing was a tad anti-climatic at best. I was really happy when Kanter busted out though. He is this year's king of the donks. The hand against Ramer was brutul, as was the Ivey hand. Or how about the Q6o and caught trip 6's?
Waiting for the winds of change
To sweep the clouds away
Waiting for the rainbow's end
To cast its gold your way
Countless ways
You pass the days

#8 PMJackson21

PMJackson21

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,942 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Jose, Ca

Posted 16 November 2005 - 12:40 PM

Randy Reed said:

The surprising thing to me was that they only showed 1 hand after it got down to the final 2. I thought they played heads up for a number of hours before Danneman made the bad call. I remember him just saying he was very tired and misread his cards, thinking he had a straight and they didn't mention any of it. The whole thing was a tad anti-climatic at best. I was really happy when Kanter busted out though. He is this year's king of the donks. The hand against Ramer was brutul, as was the Ivey hand. Or how about the Q6o and caught trip 6's?
The final table took something like 15 hours.The heads up portion took 6 hands, 3 of which were folded pre flop.Patrick

#9 Don Giovanni

Don Giovanni

    Custom member title

  • Members
  • 3,855 posts

Posted 16 November 2005 - 12:43 PM

hachem played fine

#10 KKsuited

KKsuited

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 262 posts
  • Location:Atlanta
  • Interests:Poker

Posted 16 November 2005 - 12:44 PM

not counting Mike of course, and I was really only talking about the last hour episode, finaly six player I believe.
www.thebetdoctor.com

#11 cen

cen

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 267 posts
  • Location:Cincinnati, Ohio

Posted 16 November 2005 - 12:46 PM

I didn't see anything wrong with Danneman... he said himself he was lucky to get past the first day and anything after that was extra credit...he didn't set his goals high, and was having fun getting farther than he probably ever thought he could...gotta love the AK vs 99 hand with Hachem before the final table he was calm as can be holding that set of 9's...

#12 Dr_Shakes

Dr_Shakes

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 689 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Apex, NC
  • Interests:Poker, Basketball, Sports betting

Posted 16 November 2005 - 12:51 PM

Don Giovanni said:

hachem played fine
As did Tex Barch, Andy Black, Mike Matusow, Brad Kondracki and Bergsdorf. The only ones who really donkied it up were Kanter, Lazar and to a lesser extent Dannerman.

#13 Pokerdad2222

Pokerdad2222

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 433 posts
  • Interests:Poker, Golf

Posted 16 November 2005 - 12:52 PM

Danneman was great. He made the tournament good to watch.I did think barch was saying something similar the arieh last year..

Quote

The hand against Ramer was brutul, as was the Ivey hand
Kanter is a donk and the Raymer hand was horribly played but I dont think you can include the Ivey hand in this. That is just dumb

#14 Vatche

Vatche

    Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,680 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 16 November 2005 - 01:16 PM

start spamming again...its 10 times better then this.

#15 KKsuited

KKsuited

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 262 posts
  • Location:Atlanta
  • Interests:Poker

Posted 16 November 2005 - 01:31 PM

cen said:

I didn't see anything wrong with Danneman... he said himself he was lucky to get past the first day and anything after that was extra credit...he didn't set his goals high, and was having fun getting farther than he probably ever thought he could...gotta love the AK vs 99 hand with Hachem before the final table he was calm as can be holding that set of 9's...
That's my entire problem with it though, he made it look like a joke. That didn't do anything to help the image of poker being a game of skill and the WSOP being where all the best players in the world duke it out. Danneman proved that clearly not to be the case.
www.thebetdoctor.com

#16 KKsuited

KKsuited

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 262 posts
  • Location:Atlanta
  • Interests:Poker

Posted 16 November 2005 - 01:32 PM

Vatche said:

start spamming again...its 10 times better then this.
I've been around a lot loner than you bud, I'll post whatever the hell I want to.
www.thebetdoctor.com

#17 ajs510

ajs510

    Resident Evil

  • Members
  • 24,155 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 16 November 2005 - 01:46 PM

Randy Reed said:

The surprising thing to me was that they only showed 1 hand after it got down to the final 2. I thought they played heads up for a number of hours before Danneman made the bad call.
Per Cardplayer, Heads-up lasted exactly 6 hands, and only two of the hands saw a flop.*Edit* Oops, 3 hands saw a flop, only 2 made it to showdown.

#18 CaneBrain

CaneBrain

    The chosen few....

  • Members
  • 14,532 posts
  • Location:The NFL Films Vault
  • Favorite Poker Game:5/10 NLHE (100 max buy in)

Posted 16 November 2005 - 01:54 PM

I think Dannenman was a bit overmatched but his lax attitude and demeanor probably made him very hard to read. Lazar just went on tilt like many amatuers do.Hachem made a bonehead play with Q7 but otherwise looked solid.Kanter was awful. He is a richer man than me.....but wow. that K5 hand was brutal.
"Give a little bit.....give a little bit of your chips to me...."

#19 Smiggarette

Smiggarette

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 101 posts
  • Location:Stone Mountain

Posted 16 November 2005 - 02:30 PM

KKsuited said:

Vatche said:

start spamming again...its 10 times better then this.
I've been around a lot loner than you bud, I'll post whatever the hell I want to.
check your messages

#20 silkyjonson

silkyjonson

    steppin out

  • Members
  • 6,907 posts
  • Location:windsor

Posted 16 November 2005 - 02:33 PM

I thought, Black, Tex and Hachem all played well and had good control of their emotions if Hachem did'nt win then Black and Tex definitely would have been worthy champions. But Kantar and Lazaar were pitiful Kantar never in a million years could make it that far again with out donking out 10 times in a row and Lazaar pissed his money away in 3 hands. Overall I think the wsop has lost some of its lustre, When you see the final table your expecting to see a few guys who have been close and are thirsty to win the title, did'nt really get much of that in the final 6.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users