theredpill99 0 Posted November 16, 2005 Share Posted November 16, 2005 As QdI'm in MPI have $100MP2 had $100I raise to $3 preflopMP2 callsLP callsSB callsFlop: 6s 4s 3s pot=$12Ok, nut flush draw and outs to overcardsSB checksI bet $7MP2 raises to $14 (very aggro player....always raises)LP callsSB foldsTurn: 2dI checkMP2 bets $20LP calls All-inHero ? At this point pot was about $73 and I had $20 to callI didn't know if MP2 had a made straight or something. I thought about reraising all-in since MP2 had about $50 left after betting $20. Maybe I could win it right there and if not I had a lot of outs. I calledRiver: 2cI checkMP2 checksAfter the hand was done. I thought about it some more. LP's flat calls twice should have given me warning bells. And it does when I'm actually paying attention !! Link to post Share on other sites
theredpill99 0 Posted November 16, 2005 Author Share Posted November 16, 2005 Here is my history with these Pokerroom games. I need some advice. First day of .50/1 NL and I figured that to really beat these games takes more than ABC poker. So for the first 5 days, I played LAG and played a lot of hands and a lot of two suited hands and made a lot of bluffs. A lot of bluffs. Maybe 40 % of my bets were bluffs and showing bluffs. I would lose large sums of money sometimes but then I'd make large sums and make more than I was losing. It was strange but it was working. It was working so I kept doing it. I was doing dumb things like I'd have 66 on a flop of Q 5 9I'd bet out $6 in SB after calling a preflop raisePreflop raiser would raise me back to $12 and I'd raise it to $20 and he'd callThen check turn and fire a $20 bet on river and take it down. That's basically against ABC poker where it's "No set no bet with small pockets" So I racked up $900 in that first week but in the 2nd week I reverted back to my tight aggressive self and I haven't made a dime since. But I'm also getting really unlucky but I wonder if I was onto something ? I'm just trying to win again. I'm down $70 again tonight. Link to post Share on other sites
iggymcfly 0 Posted November 16, 2005 Share Posted November 16, 2005 OK, folding that A-Q from the first post would be ridiculous. You were easily getting the right odds to draw to the nut flush with implied odds.If the all-in player had the straight flush, then bad luck I guess, but I don't see how you could possibly know that from the action. Furthermore, if you do hit your spade, you can still win money on the side pot from the other player, (who appears to have been on a spade draw as well.)Finally, raising makes no sense whatsoever as there's already an all-in player, and you'd make very little by stealing the pot, and also cut down your equity significantly if you knock out someone with a spade that would have called you if you hit your flush on the river.As for your second post, I agree that it plays to be unpredictable in NL cash games. What would be ideal is if you played your tight ABC game enough that people were convinced that was how you played poker, but then you go and make some creative steals about 3 or 4 times an hour. Being aggressive helps a lot in terms of getting payed off when you do hit your hand as well. Link to post Share on other sites
theredpill99 0 Posted November 16, 2005 Author Share Posted November 16, 2005 Thanks Iggy. So I played it right ? Good. That player that bet $20 on the turn had 77 and no spades !! The player was a female, though so there you go. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now