whats wrong with san fran?

[Fphillips 0]

I just read a disturbing tidbit of news. It seems the good people of San Fransico have voted to ban the sale of firearms in their city and have ordered all citizens to turn all hand guns over to police by April 1 2006. That excludes police and military.The NRA is of course defending the law abiding poeples right to keep and bare arms under the second amendment. I am sure that this will be overturned. You cannot take away a LAW abiding persons right to own a firearm PERIOD! This is garbage. I don't care if your a liberal or conservitive this is wrong. Thank God I'm in Alabama where this would never happen. By the way I just got my new Ruger SuperBlackHawk single action revolver chambered 44mag and I love it! Hell of a firearm.

[SFkid 0]

People in San Francisco sometimes just dont see the bigger picture.

[Longshanks 0]

dont worry, the supreme court will uphold our constitutional rights...... oh wait, our country is a shell of what it used to be

[Stylin_Fish 0]

I just read a disturbing tidbit of news. It seems the good people of San Fransico have voted to ban the sale of firearms in their city and have ordered all citizens to turn all hand guns over to police by April 1 2006. That excludes police and military.The NRA is of course defending the law abiding poeples right to keep and bare arms under the second amendment. I am sure that this will be overturned. You cannot take away a LAW abiding persons right to own a firearm PERIOD! This is garbage. I don't care if your a liberal or conservitive this is wrong. Thank God I'm in Alabama where this would never happen. By the way I just got my new Ruger SuperBlackHawk single action revolver chambered 44mag and I love it! Hell of a firearm.

Thankfully my ak-47 isn't a handgun!!! hahahaAnd I don't live in San Fran.

[Whiskey16 1]

I just read a disturbing tidbit of news. It seems the good people of San Fransico have voted to ban the sale of firearms in their city and have ordered all citizens to turn all hand guns over to police by April 1 2006. That excludes police and military.The NRA is of course defending the law abiding poeples right to keep and bare arms under the second amendment. I am sure that this will be overturned. You cannot take away a LAW abiding persons right to own a firearm PERIOD! This is garbage. I don't care if your a liberal or conservitive this is wrong. Thank God I'm in Alabama where this would never happen. By the way I just got my new Ruger SuperBlackHawk single action revolver chambered 44mag and I love it! Hell of a firearm.

This has been a law in Chicago for years.

[Don Giovanni 0]

good. there needs to be more control on guns.

[custom36 5]

Did you expect anything else from a California city? I'm surprised they didn't do this a long time ago. I support it. They should see a decrease in crime now.

[Fphillips 0]

good. there needs to be more control on guns.

I'm all for gun control Don, keeping them out of the hands of criminals is a must. It's not the people that legally own firearms thats the problem.

[Fphillips 0]

Did you expect anything else from a California city? I'm surprised they didn't do this a long time ago. I support it. They should see a decrease in crime now.

No they wont, honest law abiding people don't use guns purchased legally to commit crimes. Thugs and criminals will still carry and buy guns unlawfully and use them to commit crimes. Come on man you smarter than that.

[buzbrad11 0]

Did you expect anything else from a California city? I'm surprised they didn't do this a long time ago. I support it. They should see a decrease in crime now.

No they wont, honest law abiding people don't use guns purchased legally to commit crimes. Thugs and criminals will still carry and buy guns unlawfully and use them to commit crimes. Come on man you smarter than that.

To decrease gun crime you really need to focus on more sever punishment, ie, minimum sentences for violent gun crime must be inforced strongly.

[Pupsta 0]

thank god i live in florida...where i know that if someone feels threatened, they can legally blast me to bits.that's right, though. tournament poker is a threat to our society and well-being here.

[kers2 0]

Did you expect anything else from a California city? I'm surprised they didn't do this a long time ago. I support it. They should see a decrease in crime now.

No they wont, honest law abiding people don't use guns purchased legally to commit crimes. Thugs and criminals will still carry and buy guns unlawfully and use them to commit crimes. Come on man you smarter than that.

What exactly do law abiding people who purchase guns legally do with them?

[Pupsta 0]

Did you expect anything else from a California city? I'm surprised they didn't do this a long time ago. I support it. They should see a decrease in crime now.

No they wont, honest law abiding people don't use guns purchased legally to commit crimes. Thugs and criminals will still carry and buy guns unlawfully and use them to commit crimes. Come on man you smarter than that.

What exactly do law abiding people who purchase guns legally do with them?

compensate for their small penis.

[Longshanks 0]

you guys supporting this law are ignorant or just retarded, you are basically saying you do not support the constitution as well as saying only criminals should have guns, don tlike guns? go back to russia

[Pupsta 0]

you guys supporting this law are ignorant or just retarded, you are basically saying you do not support the constitution as well as saying only criminals should have guns, don tlike guns? go back to russia

you're right, i don't support the 2nd amendment...it's outdated with the modern technology....weapons HAVE evolved in the last 250 years, in case you didn't notice.

[Fphillips 0]

you guys supporting this law are ignorant or just retarded, you are basically saying you do not support the constitution as well as saying only criminals should have guns, don tlike guns? go back to russia

you're right, i don't support the 2nd amendment...it's outdated with the modern technology....weapons HAVE evolved in the last 250 years, in case you didn't notice.

So have criminals.

[Pupsta 0]

you guys supporting this law are ignorant or just retarded, you are basically saying you do not support the constitution as well as saying only criminals should have guns, don tlike guns? go back to russia

you're right, i don't support the 2nd amendment...it's outdated with the modern technology....weapons HAVE evolved in the last 250 years, in case you didn't notice.

So have criminals.

so thus, it's a good idea to defend their rights to easily obtain weapons?

[Fphillips 0]

By the way Pupsta do you just support the parts of the constitution that you agree with? I don't agree with alot of things Americans have the right to do, but our constitution protects all of our rights , not just the ones you agree with.

[Pupsta 0]

By the way Pupsta do you just support the parts of the constitution that you agree with? I don't agree with alot of things Americans have the right to do, but our constitution protects all of our rights , not just the ones you agree with.

i believe that there are parts that should be revised, because times they are a-changin' over the last 250 years.

[Fphillips 0]

By the way Pupsta do you just support the parts of the constitution that you agree with? I don't agree with alot of things Americans have the right to do, but our constitution protects all of our rights , not just the ones you agree with.

i believe that there are parts that should be revised, because times they are a-changin' over the last 250 years.

I would agree to that, but I will never support any claim that says making it hard for law abiding people to purchase and own firearms will decrease violent crimes. Criminals will always be able to get guns PERIOD. So the good people of the US lose rights that criminals ignore anyway.

[custom36 5]

you guys supporting this law are ignorant or just retarded, you are basically saying you do not support the constitution as well as saying only criminals should have guns, don tlike guns? go back to russia

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Hey, I'm all for a well regulated militia (ie. the millitary, the police force) having guns. I just don't think individuals should have them.Clearly I'm not the ignorant one. Go back to school.

[Fphillips 0]

you guys supporting this law are ignorant or just retarded, you are basically saying you do not support the constitution as well as saying only criminals should have guns, don tlike guns? go back to russia

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Hey, I'm all for a well regulated militia (ie. the millitary, the police force) having guns. I just don't think individuals should have them.Clearly I'm not the ignorant one. Go back to school.

The term Militia describes a civilian armed force available at the ready to defend life and property of the state. To defend the civil libertys of others. So clearly you should have studied a different subject. I say this with the upmost respect.

[kers2 0]

Did you expect anything else from a California city? I'm surprised they didn't do this a long time ago. I support it. They should see a decrease in crime now.

No they wont, honest law abiding people don't use guns purchased legally to commit crimes. Thugs and criminals will still carry and buy guns unlawfully and use them to commit crimes. Come on man you smarter than that.

What exactly do law abiding people who purchase guns legally do with them?

Still waitingAnd I'm talking about handguns because you cant hunt with handguns... or caaaaan you?? (Homer Simpson voice)

[custom36 5]

you guys supporting this law are ignorant or just retarded, you are basically saying you do not support the constitution as well as saying only criminals should have guns, don tlike guns? go back to russia

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Hey, I'm all for a well regulated militia (ie. the millitary, the police force) having guns. I just don't think individuals should have them.Clearly I'm not the ignorant one. Go back to school.

The term Militia describes a civilian armed force available at the ready to defend life and property of the state. To defend the civil libertys of others. So clearly you should have studied a different subject. I say this with the upmost respect.

How many civilian armed forces are there? And we have groups that defend civil liberties (ACLU, for example)We have a well trained army which makes militias unnecessary right now. And, the 2nd amendment doesn't cover individual private citizens owning guns. They're not even owning guns for the security of the state!How is this covered by the 2nd amendment again?

[Fphillips 0]

Did you expect anything else from a California city? I'm surprised they didn't do this a long time ago. I support it. They should see a decrease in crime now.

No they wont, honest law abiding people don't use guns purchased legally to commit crimes. Thugs and criminals will still carry and buy guns unlawfully and use them to commit crimes. Come on man you smarter than that.

What exactly do law abiding people who purchase guns legally do with them?

Still waitingAnd I'm talking about handguns because you cant hunt with handguns... or caaaaan you?? (Homer Simpson voice)

I hunt with the afore mentioned hangun in my origional post.I also have a great 40 cal glock mini ideal for home protection. I believe in states rights even for you.