for some strange reason...as much as I prefer NL to PL and fixed I tryed a few fixed SnG's and finished 1st, 1st, and 2nd...all 10 player SnG, all $5 + $.5....am I just on a nice rush of luck...or am I better at fixed. I usually play tight to start any tourament and become more aggressive as it wears on. Are my..."skills" just fitted better for fixed limit, (and PL...first PL MTT got 20th outta 400...ish) or am I just luckier at PL and fixed...any feedback would be great, thanx
0
fixed v. nl
Started by
Guest_XXEddie_*
, Feb 07 2005 02:39 PM
2 replies to this topic
#2
wrto4556
-
- Members
- 5,418 posts
Poker Forum Veteran
Posted 07 February 2005 - 02:49 PM
you can't be "luckier" at one game than the other...Other than that, I really didn't read your post well. :?
back for kramit
#3
MSR
-
- Members
- 162 posts
Poker Forum Regular
Posted 07 February 2005 - 02:51 PM
Three sit and go's really isnt a big enough sample to know if you are better at any particular varience of poker than another. Just keep playing, you'll figure it out on your own.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
