http://fullcontactpo...ic.php?p=538619aseem
my objection with this new fcp, crossposted
Started by akishore, Nov 06 2005 08:16 PM
4 replies to this topic
#2
Posted 06 November 2005 - 09:15 PM
The reason that these changes are necessary (yes, necessary) is because strategy is different from game to game and different skills are needed at different levels. People that specialize at one can stay in that forum and help those people without having to sift through all of the posts that they can't help with.We saw this when Daniel started doing one-a-day's. He would give advice and many would disagree because play is drastically different at his levels than at micro limits and small stakes.I explained this to Daniel the same way when he asked about the HUSH forums. There are members that are excellent full-table players but absolutely awful shorthanded players. Two different sets of skills. It's like having the hold'em forum seperate from the omaha forum. It's the same reasons.This isn't a "wannabe 2+2" change, 2+2 just beat us to it. It would've happened eventually. Personally, I'd rather be closer to 2+2 than RGP.
#3
Posted 06 November 2005 - 09:28 PM
custom u able to move forums? wouldnt mind seeing all the limit forums next to each other instead of after omaha and stud...seems to be out of place down there and its away from all the limit playes traffic meaning nobody is really lookin at it
www.mattnxtc.blogspot.com
#4
Posted 06 November 2005 - 09:33 PM
Mattnxtc said:
custom u able to move forums? wouldnt mind seeing all the limit forums next to each other instead of after omaha and stud...seems to be out of place down there and its away from all the limit playes traffic meaning nobody is really lookin at it
#5
Posted 06 November 2005 - 11:03 PM
I'm locking this. you already posted this in gen pop
Wine Notes for those that care about such pretentious things
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

This topic is locked








