i was playing on PM for hr or so NL and notice that the people that iw as playing agsinst were pretty good. i made a small profit but i had to do some call bluffs which inormally dont do extra im not saying im the greatiest player in any means but either way i cash out my money for the reason that i rather play at PS or UB were the FIsh is at instead of player solid oppenents.. SEe when i play poker like most of u i try to pick the right table were there is a few fish at PM u dont have many choices to choose from do you people agree with me on that.. laters joel
poker mountain to tuff
Started by daddypoker23, Jan 27 2005 09:12 AM
6 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 27 January 2005 - 09:12 AM
#2
Posted 27 January 2005 - 10:54 AM
poor sentence structuremessage was still understoodmigraine has begunnew pond means new fishfish are very enticingsharks like to eat fish
#3
Posted 27 January 2005 - 11:13 AM
I haven't tried PM yet, although I'm sure I will at some point, but I have heard this complaint from others ... but once they really kick off their ad campaign and PR, it should bring the fish on in. At least Daniel says they have a big budget for advertising, so we will have to see.
Jason
#4
Posted 23 February 2005 - 02:37 PM
i dont think the play at pm is that much better than at other sites except so far i havnt gotten sucked out as much. anyways i would rather play against better players, even if i dont get as much money its still a better game.
#5
Posted 24 February 2005 - 03:42 PM
But if you go elsewhere, then you'd just complain about bad beats.j/k
#6
Posted 24 February 2005 - 05:37 PM
I like being the worst player. That way, I know the only direction in my game is upwards. Playing with bad players makes it too tempting to play stupid as well.
#7
Posted 24 February 2005 - 10:47 PM
Bonobio said:
But if you go elsewhere, then you'd just complain about bad beats.j/k 
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









