Would it be weak to not go broke when you have the lower set on the 3rd hand of heads up? (both flopped)chips are about 50/50Non threatening, rainbow board.
0
heads up nl set over set - online
Started by Whatever, Sep 12 2005 06:44 AM
3 replies to this topic
#1
Whatever
-
- Members
- 1,694 posts
Poker Forum Veteran
- Gender:Male
- Location:McAllen, Tx
Posted 12 September 2005 - 06:44 AM
#2
BeanGW
-
- Members
- 1,480 posts
Poker Forum Veteran
- Location:Movin on up... to the East Side
- Interests:Women, booze, and gambling
Posted 12 September 2005 - 07:23 AM
Yes. It would be weak to fold any set heads-up on an otherwise nonthreatening board.Actually it would probably be weak to fold on a somewhat threatening board heads-up as well.
The recent legislative history of internet gambling legislation reinforces the Court's determination that internet gambling on a game of chance is not prohibited conduct under 18 U.S.C. § 1084. So you can SIIHP.
#3
Swift_Psycho
-
- Members
- 4,889 posts
Poker Forum Veteran
Posted 12 September 2005 - 08:31 AM
BeanGW said:
Yes.
#4
TJ_Eckleburg
-
- Members
- 4,198 posts
Drunken Short-handed Deepstacked NL Master
- Gender:Male
- Location:Atlanta
- Interests:Poker, sports, music, blah blah blah
Posted 12 September 2005 - 10:03 AM
Sets exist in no limit hold'em solely to make you money when you don't have any reads.That's just the way the world works, kids.
Always bet like you've got a pair.
--Me
--Me
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
