Jump to content


6 handed vs 10 handed


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 28,823 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 25 January 2005 - 12:01 PM

I play $1.00 Sit and Gos (yeah, yeah, I'm new okay) on Ultimate Bet and find that I consistently finish 1st or 2nd at 6 handed tables yet I bust out early in 10 handed tables.Is there a simple explanation for this (lack of patience) or could it be a number of things?

#2 Spidurman

Spidurman

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 210 posts
  • Location:On the banks of the river
  • Interests:Not Work

Posted 25 January 2005 - 01:03 PM

well the game plays differently shorthanded than full table - you're probably too aggressive in the full table game - tighten your starting hand requirements and you oughta last longer.

#3 Shred

Shred

    Poker Forum Newbie

  • Members
  • 24 posts
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 26 January 2005 - 01:20 PM

There have been some great articles on strategy on SnGs in Cardplayer magazine. The basic premise - and this is basic - is to play extremely tight during the first few levels only playing premium hands, AA, KK, AKs, QQ, etc, and let the live ones knock each other out. I don't think you are giving much up by allowing other players to knock each other out and not building your stack especially at low buy-in NL SnGs. Then when the table gets to 6 or 7 players you turn up the agression and continue from there. Again this is very basic stuff. I'd check out cardplayer.com and search for sit and go's in the articles.

#4 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 28,823 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 27 January 2005 - 07:20 AM

Thanks guys!!!




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users