do you always call down a savage?

[Rocketwadster 0]

This hand tipped me off that the villain (in the next hand) is a savage (hand-made hand history):Rocketwad is MP1 with ace king . Villain is button.2 folds. Rocketwad raises. 2 folds. CO calls. Button calls. Blinds fold.Flop is 3 4 6 Rocketwad bets, CO calls, Button calls.Turn is q Rocketwad checks (I give up). CO bets. Button calls. Rocketwad folds.River is 9 CO bets. Button calls.CO shows ace 6 Button shows 9 10 Now that was weird (at least I thought it was weird).Soooo, a few hands later, I am in the CO position with the following:Rocketwadster is CO with k 9 5 folds, Rocektwadster raises, Button Folds, Sb folds, BB 3-bets (Button villain from above hand...aka the savage), Rocketwadster calls.Flop is k 8 10 BB checks, Rocketwadster bets, BB raises, Rocketwadster calls.Turn is 5 BB bets, Rocketwadster calls.River is 3 BB bets, Rocketwadster calls.BB shows ace ace Was this correct, based on what I have seen this opponent do in the very recent past? :?

[CobaltBlue 662]

1st hand...he's a passive calling station...2nd hand...he's playing aggressively...might have to let it go.

[Rocketwadster 0]

1st hand...he's a passive calling station...2nd hand...he's playing aggressively...might have to let it go.

For the first hand, if the nine came on the flop or turn, I might call him a calling station. It came on the river though, so what was he calling on? Ten high? Second hand - yes, he has no shown some aggression that he did not in the first hand (he didnt even raise after hitting one of his cards on the river...), however, do I automatically give him credit for having pocket aces, pocket kings, pocket 8's, pocket tens, or ace king and possibly ace queen (all these hands could 3-bet pre-flop and check raise the flop with the exception of the ace queen IMO)? Could he not very easily have pocket queens, pocket jacks, pocket nines, etc. that I am currently beating? :?