Posted 21 January 2005 - 12:43 PM
I really should have PMed you about this, but this info might be valuable to others so here goes: There is no standard for staking agreements. Some are done by legal contract, some are just done verbally. Usually in the verbally done ones, the staker would have very persuasive methods of ensuring payment, if you catch my drift. As far as staking him in tournaments, your cut should be whatever you can get him to agree on. If you are fronting the whole buyin, any less than 50% would be ridiculous, but even this number would be very low unless you were exceptionally confident in his abilities. If you are worried about him having incentive to play recklessly at all, definitely have him commit a financial investment. There are no online sites that will facilitate staking directly, and drawing up a legal contract for this purpose will be difficult as online gaming is technically illegal in the US (i work for a law firm so i have some knowledge in this area). As for scouting out other players, be careful. Poker players strive to master the art of deception. The best players may seem reckless and stupid to you. It will be hard for a casual observer to ascertain who is an exceptional player without having an exceptional grasp of the game themselves. It can take months, or even years, to analyze someone's game. A final word of advice: Be vary wary of a player who says they are excellent but fail due to lack of funding. A good poker player must have more than just good poker sense. They must have discipline, and bankroll management. If they are so good, why dont they have money? surely they are winning? Usually, it is because they arent that good, or they have terrible money management skills, which is about as bad as being a poor card player. Poker is an egalitarian game, in that the only thing which matters is money. Those who are better eventually end up with the money. You are not likely to find an exceptional player who wants to be staked, as he should be winning plenty already, and would not want to share his profits needlessly. The exception, of course, would be if you found an exceptional 30-60 player and wanted to stake him for 100k to play 100-200. You're average 10-20 player, though, is playing 10-20 because he cannot beat the 20-40. If he could, he would be winning enough at 10-20 to make a go of it.