Jump to content


check or bet this river


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 Mattnxtc

Mattnxtc

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,707 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston

Posted 11 July 2005 - 02:36 PM

1/2 bodog 6 maxon the button with aj diamonds checked to me i raise to 2 only sb callsflop jk6 he checks i bet he callsturn 5 he checks i betriver 9 he checks...I ? read on the guy is pretty tight passive...he didnt raise queens in the small blind and only came to life once a queen hit the river

#2 CoolHandLaw

CoolHandLaw

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 395 posts
  • Location:Canada

Posted 11 July 2005 - 02:39 PM

I check

#3 CobaltBlue

CobaltBlue

    Post-Apocalyptic Wanderer

  • Members
  • 9,167 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ft Lauderdale, FL
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hold 'Em, Crazy Pineapple, 2-7 TD

Posted 11 July 2005 - 02:41 PM

You may miss out on a value bet if he's got a pair of jacks with a weaker kicker or something worse...but I think a check's fine.Oh, and you really need to get better about listing the suits, Matt.

#4 CoolHandLaw

CoolHandLaw

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 395 posts
  • Location:Canada

Posted 11 July 2005 - 02:49 PM

CobaltBlue said:

You may miss out on a value bet if he's got a pair of jacks with a weaker kicker or something worse...but I think a check's fine.Oh, and you really need to get better about listing the suits, Matt.
Doubt a tight passive player would play a Jx to a raise. I'm thinking he has a king here but doesn't know how to play it properly and is scared that you have a bigger king

#5 screech

screech

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,376 posts

Posted 11 July 2005 - 03:05 PM

check behind.He's calling with a king more than he will with a weaker jack.

#6 H8it4ya

H8it4ya

    Poker Forum Newbie

  • Members
  • 70 posts

Posted 11 July 2005 - 03:45 PM

Its the KRABLER, and hes worried hes outkicked

#7 Steppin Razor

Steppin Razor

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 713 posts

Posted 11 July 2005 - 05:43 PM

Guess I'm the minority, but I bet. You played like you had K+good kicker, and you might get him off his hand. If he's tight passive, I don't think he'd be playing K/cr*p kicker. I could see him having something like QJ or AJ like you have. Maybe K/10 suited.In any case, I'm going to lean on him until he pushes back. Let him worry about what I have.

#8 looshle

looshle

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,236 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Connecticut

Posted 11 July 2005 - 08:27 PM

Most of the times its a Jack with a weaker kicker, I'd bet it.

#9 CoolHandLaw

CoolHandLaw

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 395 posts
  • Location:Canada

Posted 12 July 2005 - 08:25 AM

I'm probably beating a dead horse here, but I can't see why some of you think it's a Jack w/ weak kicker. The player is tight/passive. A tight player is not playing a Jx to a raise in 1st position. I dont think he's even willing to play QJ in 1st position to a raise. The only hands I can see him playing are AJ (in which case, if you bet you're giving up money to the rake only), K10 (he'll call your river bet if he's already gone this far), or maybe even AK if he's really passive. I wouldn't put him on a drawing hand either.He's obviously hit something, but if you bet the river and he raises, what would you do then?

#10 timwakefield

timwakefield

    He fixes radios by thinking!

  • Members
  • 13,883 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston

Posted 12 July 2005 - 09:07 AM

CHECK!!!! If you're not fairly certain that you have the best hand on the river you have to check, since it's unlikely that he'll fold to a single bet. It's also worth giving up a potential value bet to see his cards (on the off-chance he'd fold the river). More importantly though, yeah he probably has a king or maybe you got him on an outkicked jack, but it seems likely that he also could have q10, in which case he checked his straight on the river because he KNOWS that you'll bet. He'll then raise, knowing you have to call. If you're already afraid that you're beat on a pair AND there's a potential straight showing, check check check. Let your opponent know that he can't slowplay you on the river...it's definitely frustrating to check the nuts expecting to raise, and just get checked. Don't fall into a trap....he has a myriad of hands to beat you with CHECK!!!!!!!!!!!!

#11 Kendren

Kendren

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,304 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oneida, Tennessee

Posted 12 July 2005 - 09:57 AM

check check checkity check.betting here would be *gasp* *GAAAASP* *SPEEW*ing.Sorry, sleep deprivation.

#12 the_stein

the_stein

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 820 posts
  • Location:Boca Raton

Posted 12 July 2005 - 10:08 AM

nobody thinkss he might have q10"?

#13 timwakefield

timwakefield

    He fixes radios by thinking!

  • Members
  • 13,883 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston

Posted 12 July 2005 - 10:24 AM

Yeah I already said in my post that it looked like he was drawing on Q10.

#14 Mattnxtc

Mattnxtc

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,707 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston

Posted 12 July 2005 - 10:31 AM

the_stein said:

nobody thinkss he might have q10"?
u are pretty close to what he actuall had

#15 Kendren

Kendren

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,304 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oneida, Tennessee

Posted 12 July 2005 - 10:32 AM

Mattnxtc said:

the_stein said:

nobody thinkss he might have q10"?
u are pretty close to what he actuall had
"pretty close"? Like AQ close? I couldn't imagine he's call down with a gutshot, but maybe that's it.Or KQ. That would make more sense.

#16 timwakefield

timwakefield

    He fixes radios by thinking!

  • Members
  • 13,883 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston

Posted 12 July 2005 - 10:49 AM

" but it seems likely that he also could have q10, in which case he checked his straight on the river because he KNOWS that you'll bet"Dammit was my post too long for anybody to read?? I said it first! hahaha

#17 Mattnxtc

Mattnxtc

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,707 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston

Posted 12 July 2005 - 10:55 AM

timwakefield said:

" but it seems likely that he also could have q10, in which case he checked his straight on the river because he KNOWS that you'll bet"Dammit was my post too long for anybody to read?? I said it first! hahaha
ha sorry i just scrolled to the bottom the first time...i checked the river and he shows a10 so he was chasin a gutshot...i guess i need to change my read of him to tight passive and stupid

#18 SapphireTiger

SapphireTiger

    Captain Awesome

  • Members
  • 1,540 posts
  • Location:Los Angeles, CA/Davis, CA

Posted 12 July 2005 - 10:55 AM

its a check.

#19 Steppin Razor

Steppin Razor

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 713 posts

Posted 12 July 2005 - 11:37 AM

Well, we already have the resolution, but there's no way I'd check. I wouldn't have put a tight passive player on A1o, but no way I'd put him on Q10 - a tight player wouldn't be playing a raised pot with Q10.I also would never expect a tight passive player to check/call, then hit his hand on the river and check raise. No, if he hit his hand on the river, he's betting. If the river was a Q and he made his straight, you think this guy check raises?On the very slim chance he did check raise, you know you're beat. Fold, you don't need to see his cards, you know what he has.

#20 Rocketwadster

Rocketwadster

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 3,816 posts
  • Location:Cambridge, Ontario
  • Interests:Gambling, Sports

Posted 12 July 2005 - 11:42 AM

Looks like a check to me. He either had something to be calling you, or was drawing at something to be calling you. The river did not improve your hand, but may have improved his (so he may be doing a check/raise). :wink:




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users