Jump to content


jj vs. 3-bets


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 RISEorFall

RISEorFall

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,984 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:I'm bad, I'm nationwide
  • Favorite Poker Game:HU freezeout 4 souls

Posted 10 July 2005 - 01:59 PM

.25/.50 on Absolute...from memory so not completely accurate...the parts im worried about are tho...RISE is UTG with JJPF: RISE raises, 1 cold call, CO 3-bets, BB calls, I call, cold caller does what he does, and calls. Flop: (~12 SB) something like 4 6 8 rainbowBB checks, RISE checks, cold caller checks, CO bets, BB folds, RISE raises, cold caller folds, CO 3-bets, RISE callsTurn: (~9 BB) 7RISE checks, CO bets, RISE callsRiver (~11 BB) QRISE checks, CO checksFinal Pot ~11 BBanybody cap PF? I check/raise the flop to get heads up with CO and let him bet AK.His 3-bet scares me so I call down.should i have bet or raised the turn?

#2 akishore

akishore

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,228 posts
  • Location:Cambridge (Boston), MA
  • Interests:Poker, jazz, programming, taekwondo, rock climbing, movies, etc.

Posted 10 July 2005 - 02:04 PM

RISEorFall said:

anybody cap PF?
only if you have a read that the raiser is a maniac. most times, no.

RISEorFall said:

I check/raise the flop to get heads up with CO and let him bet AK.
good.

RISEorFall said:

His 3-bet scares me so I call down.
calling down is weak. without a read, it might be okay. a lot of people three-bet 10-10 and 9-9.if you have a read that he's a tight player, the turn is an okay spot to fold, unless you know that he semi-bluffs A-K and the like nonstop. likewise, if he's a maniac, you can check-raise the turn again and call down if he three-bets.most times, calling down is okay in this spot without a read.

RISEorFall said:

should i have bet or raised the turn?
see above.without a read, nice hand.aseem
After a long hiatus, my poker blog is back!

#3 RISEorFall

RISEorFall

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,984 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:I'm bad, I'm nationwide
  • Favorite Poker Game:HU freezeout 4 souls

Posted 10 July 2005 - 02:16 PM

no reads on the guyIf I'm not mistaken, I only have to be good about 1 in 9 times to make calling down from the turn on correct. However, I agree that this is weak. Should I take a wa/wb line and check/call the turn, then bet/call the river? I don't really like check/raising the turn because he 3-bet with a better hand most of the time and quits betting AK. Is this wrong?

#4 akishore

akishore

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,228 posts
  • Location:Cambridge (Boston), MA
  • Interests:Poker, jazz, programming, taekwondo, rock climbing, movies, etc.

Posted 10 July 2005 - 02:40 PM

RISEorFall said:

no reads on the guyIf I'm not mistaken, I only have to be good about 1 in 9 times to make calling down from the turn on correct. However, I agree that this is weak. Should I take a wa/wb line and check/call the turn, then bet/call the river? I don't really like check/raising the turn because he 3-bet with a better hand most of the time and quits betting AK. Is this wrong?
1. you have to be right about 1 in 5 times. you're getting 10-to-1 on the turn, but you're calling another bet on the river, so your total effective odds are 11-to-2.2. wa/wb line is not applicable here. if he has A-K or A-Q or K-Q, he's not way behind. that's why it boils down to a read of whether he would three-bet unimproved A-K/A-Q/K-Q on that flop and then even bet the turn or not.3. the reason calling down is okay is specifically because a player might play 10-10 or 9-9 this aggressively as well. if you had 10-10 or 9-9, the decision would be much closer and i might advocate folding the turn without a read.aseem
After a long hiatus, my poker blog is back!

#5 RISEorFall

RISEorFall

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,984 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:I'm bad, I'm nationwide
  • Favorite Poker Game:HU freezeout 4 souls

Posted 10 July 2005 - 03:39 PM

akishore said:

2. wa/wb line is not applicable here. if he has A-K or A-Q or K-Q, he's not way behind.
Makes sense. I think I overlook that a lot.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users