econ_tim 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Ultimate Bet 1/2 Hold'em (8 handed) converterPreflop: econ_tim is UTG+1 with [Kc], [Qh]. MP2 posts a blind of $1. UTG calls, econ_tim raises, UTG calls.Flop: (9.50 SB) [Td], [Js], [Ac] (4 players)UTG checks, econ_tim bets, UTG calls, econ_tim calls.Turn: (7.75 BB) [8s] (3 players)UTG checks, econ_tim checks, CO bets, CO calls, UTG calls.River: (13.75 BB) [8d] (3 players)UTG checks, econ_tim bets, CO calls, UTG calls.Final Pot: 16.75 BBRight to trap UTG here?Don't worry Custom, Empire is next. Link to post Share on other sites
custom36 5 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 :lol:Anyway, this hand looks fine. Link to post Share on other sites
Dirtydutch 9 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Perfect. Link to post Share on other sites
Dirtydutch 9 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 My avitar back up? Link to post Share on other sites
custom36 5 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 My avitar back up?Yup. Link to post Share on other sites
Dirtydutch 9 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 I tryed to get jessica alba on there, but it didn't work. Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Hi, this isn't "trapping"It's a stop and go. Link to post Share on other sites
econ_tim 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Author Share Posted June 29, 2005 Hi, this isn't "trapping"It's a stop and go.OK. I'm just trying to get the hapless UTG to call as many bets as possible. Maybe I need to work on my poker jargon. Can't I trap him with my stop and go? :-) Link to post Share on other sites
Dirtydutch 9 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Hi, this isn't "trapping"It's a stop and go.You, and your fancy names! you may think you know everything, but you don't know how to not hurt someones feelings! :cry: :cry: Link to post Share on other sites
econ_tim 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Author Share Posted June 29, 2005 BTW, of the three poker terms in the subject (flop, trap, and broadway), I used at least two of them correctly, so I don't feel that bad. Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 It's just a semantic thing. If you check/called the flop and then raised the turn...that'd be "trapping".This is, of course, the much better line (yours). Link to post Share on other sites
akishore 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Hi, this isn't "trapping"It's a stop and go.no it's not.a stop and go would mean OP led the turn.he didn't. aseem Link to post Share on other sites
akishore 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 It's just a semantic thing. If you check/called the flop and then raised the turn...that'd be "trapping".This is, of course, the much better line (yours).he was OOP. he bet/called the turn and check/raised the turn.almost identical line to calling the flop and raising the turn if he was in position.they're both trapping, no?aseem Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 they're both trapping, no? No.Trapping, you show weakness with stregnth, then raise. Stop and go, you show stregnth, flat call a raise indicating some weakness inducing a bet on a bigger street which you raise. Link to post Share on other sites
akishore 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 hmm. i was under the impression that a stop and go was:i'm SB with K-K. flop comes K-7-2. i bet, button raises, i call. turn comes 4, i bet.(i stopped on the raise and "go"-ed on the turn by leading out.)if a stop and go is also flat-calling a raise and check-raising the turn (rather than leading the turn), okay.aseem Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 It's just a semantic thing. Link to post Share on other sites
econ_tim 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Author Share Posted June 29, 2005 Maybe this is the thread to revive the "implied odds" vs. "inferred odds" controversy. Link to post Share on other sites
akishore 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Maybe this is the thread to revive the "implied odds" vs. "inferred odds" controversy.lmao. aseem Link to post Share on other sites
akishore 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 It's just a semantic thing. aseem Link to post Share on other sites
Vade 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 It's just a semantic thing. L0l @ quoting yourself. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now