Guest Posted January 12, 2005 Share Posted January 12, 2005 Kj before the flop in an unraised pot is one of my favorite hands to play. The reasons why...1. Almost all of the people Ive played against, online and love wont limp with AJ, KQ, or AK.2. with this knowledge if you hit the top pair of Jacks or Kings you most likey are good, given knowone limped with a big pair, tripped up, or got lucky and hit two pair.I would like to hear some of your responses to this and im wondering if yall have noticed the same thing. Link to post Share on other sites
tekn0wledg 0 Posted January 12, 2005 Share Posted January 12, 2005 I only play this hand from late position in an unraised pot. I will raise with it if suited as well.I don't like playing hands like this generally though because of the AJ potential or KQ potential. Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted January 12, 2005 Share Posted January 12, 2005 I would like to hear some of your responses to this and im wondering if yall have noticed the same thing.KJ sucks. Most people don't raise AJ unless they are first in.It'd help a little if you perhaps explained WHAT GAME you're talking about and how you play it. Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted January 12, 2005 Share Posted January 12, 2005 sorry, i usually play with 6 or 7 guys a few times a week, and in a shorthanded game like that, i think youd most likely raise with a AJ even in an early position. Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted January 12, 2005 Share Posted January 12, 2005 6 or 7 isn't really shorthanded.What GAME were you talking about, Limit, NL, PL? Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted January 12, 2005 Share Posted January 12, 2005 6 or 7 isn't really shorthanded.What GAME were you talking about, Limit, NL, PL? Link to post Share on other sites
Wlleiotl 0 Posted January 12, 2005 Share Posted January 12, 2005 I love KJ as well.It means i get called down a lot if i hit my K or J with KQ or AJ when ive limped. Link to post Share on other sites
MaxStrick 0 Posted January 13, 2005 Share Posted January 13, 2005 6 or 7 isn't really shorthanded.What GAME were you talking about, Limit, NL, PL?LOL, 6 handed, is the DEFINITION of shorthanded play. WSOP this year, the shorthanded tournaments will be played 6 handed. Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted January 13, 2005 Share Posted January 13, 2005 LOL, 6 handed, is the DEFINITION of shorthanded play.No, really it isn't. It's shorter than 10 handed but plays not much diffrent than a 10 person game.I think of 3-4 people as shorthanded. I think most experienced players feel the same. Link to post Share on other sites
PukaPlaya 0 Posted January 14, 2005 Share Posted January 14, 2005 6 or less is considered shorthanded by most people. Link to post Share on other sites
MaxStrick 0 Posted January 14, 2005 Share Posted January 14, 2005 LOL, 6 handed, is the DEFINITION of shorthanded play.No, really it isn't. It's shorter than 10 handed but plays not much diffrent than a 10 person game.I think of 3-4 people as shorthanded. I think most experienced players feel the same.Then you and your "experienced" players would be wrong. Sorry, but it's a fact, 6 handed is shorthanded play. Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted January 14, 2005 Share Posted January 14, 2005 Then you and your "experienced" players would be wrong. Sorry, but it's a fact, 6 handed is shorthanded play.Again, no.6 player max tables are called "shorthanded" tables because you're more likely to see 3 or 4 people than you are at a 10 person table.6 isn't particularly shorthanded.It's a matter of oppinion, there is no "definition" of it. If you read any short handed theory it's not about playing with 6 people at the table. You're confusing two diffrent uses of the term. Link to post Share on other sites
JaysonWeber 0 Posted January 14, 2005 Share Posted January 14, 2005 Well it does depend on how many people are playing in the game, with a full ring game 9-10, depending on the players I'm playing with, sometimes I'll even raise with it UTG (if they are the type to cold call not re-raise pre-flop), but most of the time I'll only raise with this from late position.I consider 6 player a shorthanded game, and I will open up my starting hands relative to the number of players, so with that in mind, in a 6 handed game I'll ussually raise from mid-late position with this hand, and possibly from early position. Link to post Share on other sites
MaxStrick 0 Posted January 14, 2005 Share Posted January 14, 2005 Again, no.6 player max tables are called "shorthanded" tables because you're more likely to see 3 or 4 people than you are at a 10 person table.6 isn't particularly shorthanded.It's a matter of oppinion, there is no "definition" of it. Â If you read any short handed theory it's not about playing with 6 people at the table. Â You're confusing two diffrent uses of the term.Then why are 6 person tables played at SHORTHANDED tournaments, where there will be table changes and a full table of 6 at most times?I agree with you that it is can be an opinion, but the MAJORITY opinion is that 6 person is the beginning of shorthanded play.Eh, go argue with Matt Savage. Link to post Share on other sites
NYSPOKER 0 Posted January 14, 2005 Share Posted January 14, 2005 No, really it isn't. Â It's shorter than 10 handed but plays not much diffrent than a 10 person game.Got to disagree, here. Especially, if we are talking limit; even more so if the game is raked. A six-handed game would play much differently than a full 9/10 handed game.Blinds come around much faster, and the rake is more substantial. Opening hand requirements loosen up, considerably. Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 Again, two diffrent terms.Your starting hand requirements shouldn't really be that much looser on a 6-max table. Your raising requirements should be less restrictive.If you're playing TJo because there's 6 people instead of 10 you're going to lose a lot of money. Link to post Share on other sites
Mandelbrot 0 Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 Most ppl consider 6 to be the number at which game play differs meaningfully. Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 Most ppl consider 6 to be the number at which game play differs meaningfully.I guess that explains all the horrible loose play at 6-max tables. Link to post Share on other sites
MaxStrick 0 Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 Most ppl consider 6 to be the number at which game play differs meaningfully.I guess that explains all the horrible loose play at 6-max tables.Guess so. Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted January 16, 2005 Share Posted January 16, 2005 king jack not 10J Link to post Share on other sites
NYSPOKER 0 Posted January 17, 2005 Share Posted January 17, 2005 Again, two diffrent terms.Your starting hand requirements shouldn't really be that much looser on a 6-max table. Â Your raising requirements should be less restrictive.If you're playing TJo because there's 6 people instead of 10 you're going to lose a lot of money.Agreed, note I said "opening hand requirements". At a 9-10 seated table I tend not to limp too often, if I come in it is raising. However, with the right circumstances, I will limp in. 6 handed, limping is seldom an option, unless I am slow playing a big PP, which I do not do too often. As such, I do open (come in raising) with more marginal hands, depending on position and action before me. At lower limits, I experience less bad beats in a 6-handed game, for the obvious reasons. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted January 17, 2005 Share Posted January 17, 2005 What was the original question....the definition of a shorthanded table? Link to post Share on other sites
JFarrell20 1 Posted January 17, 2005 Share Posted January 17, 2005 How are you good here if a jack falls on the flop and you think someone limped in with AJ???KJ is not strong. You will lose a lot of money over-valuing this hand. Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted January 17, 2005 Share Posted January 17, 2005 At lower limits, I experience less bad beats in a 6-handed game, for the obvious reasons.You should be seeing more.For obvious reasons, Link to post Share on other sites
NYSPOKER 0 Posted January 18, 2005 Share Posted January 18, 2005 At lower limits, I experience less bad beats in a 6-handed game, for the obvious reasons.You should be seeing more.For obvious reasons,Curious, care to elaborate? My experience has been that there are less players competing for the pot, which yields less bad beats. Perhaps it is my perception of a bad beat. Interested to hear another take on it, though. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now