Fellow Strategy Comrades:I found this article in todays Cardplayer to be an especially interesting read. If you haven't taken a look at it already today, IMHO it's worth the read, and perhaps even might enduce some discussion. Personally, I can't see any reason to argue with his logic or math here.http://www.cardplaye....php?a_id=14423
0
way ahead / way behind article
Started by BeanGW, Jun 22 2005 05:17 AM
5 replies to this topic
#1
BeanGW
-
- Members
- 1,480 posts
Poker Forum Veteran
- Location:Movin on up... to the East Side
- Interests:Women, booze, and gambling
Posted 22 June 2005 - 05:17 AM
The recent legislative history of internet gambling legislation reinforces the Court's determination that internet gambling on a game of chance is not prohibited conduct under 18 U.S.C. § 1084. So you can SIIHP.
#2
justblaze
-
- Members
- 4,430 posts
Poker Forum Veteran
Posted 22 June 2005 - 08:10 AM
very interesting. thx.
#3
Smasharoo
-
- Members
- 8,879 posts
Poker Forum Veteran
- Location:Boston
Posted 22 June 2005 - 09:46 AM
It's allways good to see 80/160 players advocating being calling stations.
#4
bdams19
-
- Members
- 964 posts
Poker Forum Groupie
Posted 22 June 2005 - 09:49 AM
Haha, I was actually thinking the same thing. The whole article just seems to be based on risking getting outplayed, meh.
#5
-
- Guests
Posted 22 June 2005 - 09:59 AM
Smasharoo said:
It's allways good to see 80/160 players advocating being calling stations.
#6
bdams19
-
- Members
- 964 posts
Poker Forum Groupie
Posted 22 June 2005 - 10:04 AM
The fact that his example sites a hand where you don't really know what your opponent has, but he only has 2 outs kind of makes his argument a little one sided and ridiculous.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
