ever correct?
Started by RMac, Jun 17 2005 06:11 PM
13 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 17 June 2005 - 06:11 PM
Recently in my weekly $2-5 NL cash game I was up to about $700, it was gettin late and we were seven handed, when I raised to $20 from mid position with 8-8. A player who I respect (when he's not on tilt) went all-in from the button for about $200. Normally I would fold, but fortunately for me and the others at the table, he was on tilt and down a lot for the night. I felt strongly that he had A-K and didnt want to see a flop, just take it down right there (why else would he overbet so much?). If my read was correct, I had the best hand and I feel that if you have the edge (even such a small one as this) you've got to take advantage of it, even at the risk of a large stack hit. So I called and he turned over A-Q. He hit a Q on the flop and won the pot. I still finished up on the night but later found myself wondering if I could have saved $200 by folding and looking for a better opportunity as I was running well and felt I was outplaying the table. So the question in general is: is it ever correct to call with as slight an edge as pair vs overcards and more specifically was it correct in this situation. Sorry for the long post, but I really value highly this forum's opinion (for the most part) and any help is appreciated.
"Never tell me the odds."
- Han Solo
- Han Solo
#2
Posted 17 June 2005 - 06:17 PM
RMac said:
Recently in my weekly $2-5 NL cash game I was up to about $700, it was gettin late and we were seven handed, when I raised to $20 from mid position with 8-8. A player who I respect (when he's not on tilt) went all-in from the button for about $200. Normally I would fold, but fortunately for me and the others at the table, he was on tilt and down a lot for the night. I felt strongly that he had A-K and didnt want to see a flop, just take it down right there (why else would he overbet so much?). If my read was correct, I had the best hand and I feel that if you have the edge (even such a small one as this) you've got to take advantage of it, even at the risk of a large stack hit. So I called and he turned over A-Q. He hit a Q on the flop and won the pot. I still finished up on the night but later found myself wondering if I could have saved $200 by folding and looking for a better opportunity as I was running well and felt I was outplaying the table. So the question in general is: is it ever correct to call with as slight an edge as pair vs overcards and more specifically was it correct in this situation. Sorry for the long post, but I really value highly this forum's opinion (for the most part) and any help is appreciated.
#3
Posted 17 June 2005 - 06:27 PM
Recently in my weekly $2-5 NL cash game I was up to about $700Go home.
#4
Posted 17 June 2005 - 06:34 PM
I think DN and tons of other pros have said that if you are running well, it doesn't matter how up or down you are, you keep playing until the game turns bad. Phil Ivey is known for his marathon sessions when he feels he has his opponents on the ropes. As you (Smasharoo) pointed out for me: the game was definately good.
"Never tell me the odds."
- Han Solo
- Han Solo
#5
Posted 17 June 2005 - 06:36 PM
Any particular reason why you would fold, or did you just figure on having to take a huge dump at that point or something?
"Never tell me the odds."
- Han Solo
- Han Solo
#6
Posted 17 June 2005 - 06:38 PM
I think DN and tons of other pros have said that if you are running well, it doesn't matter how up or down you are, you keep playing until the game turns bad. Phil Ivey is known for his marathon sessions when he feels he has his opponents on the ropesNeither of those guys is calling with 88 there.Also, they're much better than you.
#7
Posted 17 June 2005 - 06:45 PM
Also, they're much better than you.not me! I have 13,000,000 play chips at Party poker!I'd have more, but no one will fold.
#8
Posted 18 June 2005 - 07:57 AM
I think you made the correct play, if you were really that sure he had AK or AQ, then you have to call in that situation.
#9
Posted 18 June 2005 - 12:55 PM
Scottp4175 said:
I think you made the correct play, if you were really that sure he had AK or AQ, then you have to call in that situation.
#10
Posted 18 June 2005 - 01:38 PM
Mr Monkey said:
Scottp4175 said:
I think you made the correct play, if you were really that sure he had AK or AQ, then you have to call in that situation.
#11
Posted 18 June 2005 - 01:52 PM
90% of the time he has 2 overs and possibly a bigger pair. since when did players on tilt not pick up 2 cards over 8 or a bigger pocket pair.hey if u or anyone else like getting $200 in on usually a coinflip at best situation go ahead.
#12
Posted 18 June 2005 - 02:03 PM
If you could see his cards, sure, call him. It's slightly +EV and this is a cash game. But since you can't, why would you call a 40xbb raise? That's pretty retarded and people like you are the reason why pushing with a gross overbet preflop with AA and KK is more profitable than playing it like normal.
#13
Posted 18 June 2005 - 02:04 PM
Ok, just noticed you had already raised to $20. Let me rephrase:
Quote
why would you call a 10 times pot size raise?
#14
Posted 18 June 2005 - 04:48 PM
KingAustin said:
The guy was on tilt, he might of looked at 22-77 and figured "what the hell, I want to flop a set"
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









