did i go overboard?
Started by Tabulus, Jun 10 2005 03:08 PM
12 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:08 PM
I want to know if I played the hand correctly. I capped the flop because even with the straight possibility I didn't want to give cards to the flush draw for cheap. The Jack on the turn doesn't bother me much so I cap for value. At the river I've already decided I'm going to pay off the set of 8's on the earlier streets (is this correct thinking? not fearing the overset?) so if the guy has quads he has quads and nothing has really changed.What do you guys think about this?Preflop: Hero is CO with 7:spade:, 7:club:. Hero posts a blind of $0.05. 3 folds, MP2 calls, Hero (poster) checks, Button calls, SB completes, BB checks.Flop: (5 SB) 5:heart:, 8:heart:, 7:diamond: (5 players)SB checks, BB checks, MP2 checks, Hero bets, BB folds, Hero calls.Turn: (7.50 BB) J:spade: (2 players)Hero bets, Hero calls.River: (15.50 BB) 8:spade: (2 players)Hero bets, Hero calls.Final Pot: 23.50 BB
#2
Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:18 PM
That's a tough one. What kind of read did you have on your opponent?I think you played it fine.
You got a date Wednesday, baby!
#3
Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:22 PM
Bet/call the turn. (he might actually have a dumb straight)Resume jamming on the river. Pay JJ, J8, and 88 off while punishing everything else.
#4
Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:25 PM
That's a tough one. What kind of read did you have on your opponent? I thought the flop raise was a free card play at best and I figured I still had outs against the made straight. The fact that he kept rolling when the overcard came up confused me and made me think either set or straight.When the board paired on the river I thought that with the straight taken care of by my full house that I would get payed off by that or maybe even an underfull.
#5
Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:27 PM
Tabulus said:
That's a tough one. What kind of read did you have on your opponent? I thought the flop raise was a free card play at best and I figured I still had outs against the made straight. The fact that he kept rolling when the overcard came up confused me and made me think either set or straight.When the board paired on the river I thought that with the straight taken care of by my full house that I would get payed off by that or maybe even an underfull.
#6
Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:58 PM
i would at the very least slow down on the river. he raised every single bet you threw out there...obviously he has SOMETHING
#7
Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:59 PM
It depends on the guy but I think he might of been overplaying his AA as there were no real scare cards till the endNever mind I though he raised pre-flop...probable str8
#8
Posted 10 June 2005 - 04:01 PM
dapokerbum said:
It depends on the guy but I think he might of been overplaying his AA as there were no real scare cards till the end
#9
Posted 10 June 2005 - 04:02 PM
allinbluff35 said:
dapokerbum said:
It depends on the guy but I think he might of been overplaying his AA as there were no real scare cards till the end
There was madness in any direction, at any hour…You could strike sparks anywhere. There was a fantastic universal sense that whatever we were doing was right, that we were winning…. And that, I think, was the handle-that sense of inevitable victory over the forces of Old and Evil. Not in any mean or military sense; we didn’t need that. Our energy would simply prevail. There was no point in fighting-on our side or theirs. We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave….So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark-that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.
#10
Posted 10 June 2005 - 04:09 PM
i would at the very least slow down on the river. he raised every single bet you threw out there...obviously he has SOMETHINGI see what you're saying, but when the board paired up on the river I thought I now beat enough hands (specifically the straight I put him on) to warrant capping it off.
#11
Posted 10 June 2005 - 04:35 PM
It's 88 a lot of the time, but not enough fo the time not to pay it off.Shit happens. Losing value against donk-limped KK/AA here sucks.
#12
Posted 10 June 2005 - 04:39 PM
I think you're against something like 88, JJ, 78 or the elusive and crappy 85 quite often, but w/o a read, I'm capping this one in my sleep at these limits. Too often you're against TT, QQ, AA, KK, A8, or the straight. It actually looks a lot like 55, to be honest...Not 3-betting the river against an overpair, trips, straight, or underfull is a disaster. All other things being equal, you're respect yourself in the morning a lot more if you play this one like a man and cap that shit.HollaaaIce
#13
Posted 10 June 2005 - 05:21 PM
allinbluff35 said:
dapokerbum said:
It depends on the guy but I think he might of been overplaying his AA as there were no real scare cards till the end
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









