150 replies to this topic

[colonel Feathers]

PDS, seems to have struck the "mainstream media" really hard.Digging through 60 lbs of old e-mails hoping to find some dirt on her, bwahahaha.Evidently, they did find some controversy when in one of her e-mails she said God bless you to aunt nancy on govt time. Atheists will be going batshi t over that one

[85suited]

LA Times Won’t Release Obama-Khalidi Tape But Posts 24,000 Sarah Palin Emailshttp://www.humaneven...le.php?id=44101

[hblask]

24,000 emails.... this is what CNN found:Palin, what a slacker

[CaneBrain]

hblask, on Saturday, June 11th, 2011, 9:59 AM, said:

24,000 emails.... this is what CNN found:Palin, what a slacker

And, yet she quit. That's pretty slacktastic. I don't remember anyone insinuating she sat around eating bon-bons while governor. We assert that she is a hypocrite and ideologue who constantly says things that are bald-face lies and then just pretends it never happened.

[nutzbuster]

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzand lol Democrats, for if not for your constant attacks, Palin would be nothing more than just another silly GOP-er rolling along.You guys are your own worst enemy.

[Pot Odds RAC]

CaneBrain, on Saturday, June 11th, 2011, 10:07 AM, said:

And, yet she quit...

I know you think this sounds really clever and relevant - you must because you bring it up every time you post about her - but it isn't really that unique. I've quit every job I've ever had except my current one.

[LongLiveYorke]

Pot Odds RAC, on Saturday, June 11th, 2011, 2:53 PM, said:

I know you think this sounds really clever and relevant - you must because you bring it up every time you post about her - but it isn't really that unique. I've quit every job I've ever had except my current one.

touche... ?

[CaneBrain]

Pot Odds RAC, on Saturday, June 11th, 2011, 2:53 PM, said:

I know you think this sounds really clever and relevant - you must because you bring it up every time you post about her - but it isn't really that unique. I've quit every job I've ever had except my current one.

Your employment history is irrelevant. Hers is not. The standards are a smidge higher when you run for president. And if she couldn't finish out a term as governor bc the scrutiny was too damaging...well that will multiplied by 1000 as the president.I agree though that her pigheaded opposition to improving childhood nutritional habits is more damaging. But comparing your quitting some random job to her quitting as governor and thinking that proves something...not seeing your point.

[85suited]

CaneBrain, on Saturday, June 11th, 2011, 4:12 PM, said:

Your employment history is irrelevant. Hers is not. The standards are a smidge higher when you run for president. And if she couldn't finish out a term as governor bc the scrutiny was too damaging...well that will multiplied by 1000 as the president.I agree though that her pigheaded opposition to improving childhood nutritional habits is more damaging. But comparing your quitting some random job to her quitting as governor and thinking that proves something...not seeing your point.

Political Resume is meaningless now that the country elected the biggest lightweight ever, BHO...

[Pot Odds RAC]

CaneBrain, on Saturday, June 11th, 2011, 5:12 PM, said:

Your employment history is irrelevant. Hers is not. The standards are a smidge higher when you run for president. And if she couldn't finish out a term as governor bc the scrutiny was too damaging...well that will multiplied by 1000 as the president.I agree though that her pigheaded opposition to improving childhood nutritional habits is more damaging. But comparing your quitting some random job to her quitting as governor and thinking that proves something...not seeing your point.

Horseshit.You're going to continually use a term like "Quit her Job" as if it relates to the common lexicon, but when I come and challenge it with a similarly common example you're going to dismiss the whole thing.Whatever.

[JubilantLankyLad]

Pot Odds RAC, on Saturday, June 11th, 2011, 11:53 AM, said:

I know you think this sounds really clever and relevant - you must because you bring it up every time you post about her - but it isn't really that unique. I've quit every job I've ever had except my current one.

Have you quit every contracted term position you've ever had before that term was up?

[Balloon guy]

JubilantLankyLad, on Saturday, June 11th, 2011, 9:18 PM, said:

Have you quit every contracted term position you've ever had before that term was up?

Why did she quit?

[FCP Bob]

Balloon guy, on Sunday, June 12th, 2011, 2:15 AM, said:

Why did she quit?

She quit to make millions of dollars. There's nothing wrong with that unless you want to ever hold high office again.

[colonel Feathers]

nutzbuster, on Saturday, June 11th, 2011, 10:56 AM, said:

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzand lol Democrats, for if not for your constant attacks, Palin would be nothing more than just another silly GOP-er rolling along.You guys are your own worst enemy.

So freaking true. If she was ignored after 2008, she wouldnt have even been a blip on anyones radar screen.She draws the crowds she does cause the media has turned her into a huge curiosityWithout her msnbc would have 25% less to talk about.

[irishguy]

colonel Feathers, on Sunday, June 12th, 2011, 1:10 PM, said:

So freaking true. If she was ignored after 2008, she wouldnt have even been a blip on anyones radar screen.She draws the crowds she does cause the media has turned her into a huge curiosityWithout her msnbc would have 25% less to talk about.

Don't you think its a good thing for the democrats having her constantly seen? Really kind of paints her as the face of the republican party which bodes very well for the dems. And the more the republicans jump to her defense the more it solidifies the notion that shes at the forefront of the party.

[Balloon guy]

irishguy, on Sunday, June 12th, 2011, 3:54 PM, said:

Don't you think its a good thing for the democrats having her constantly seen? Really kind of paints her as the face of the republican party which bodes very well for the dems. And the more the republicans jump to her defense the more it solidifies the notion that shes at the forefront of the party.

Well it could be a way to level the playing field so the dems have a chance since the entire economy sucking for all 4 years of Obama is so damning to his chances of fooling the country again. you can only run as the first black guy once.

[timwakefield]

Balloon guy, on Sunday, June 12th, 2011, 10:48 PM, said:

the entire economy sucking for all 4 years of Obama

1. We entered a major recession under Bush. The downturn began in 2007 and the major collapse came in September '08. Long before Obama was even elected.2. Obama has been President for slightly less than 2 and a half years, not 4.3. The economy has been improving.

[brvheart]

timwakefield, on Sunday, June 12th, 2011, 10:40 PM, said:

3. The economy has been improving.

Um. yeah.

[vbnautilus]

colonel Feathers, on Sunday, June 12th, 2011, 2:10 PM, said:

So freaking true. If she was ignored after 2008, she wouldnt have even been a blip on anyones radar screen.

So, if she were ignored, no one would pay attention to her?True of any political candidate.

[colonel Feathers]

irishguy, on Sunday, June 12th, 2011, 3:54 PM, said:

Don't you think its a good thing for the democrats having her constantly seen? Really kind of paints her as the face of the republican party which bodes very well for the dems. And the more the republicans jump to her defense the more it solidifies the notion that shes at the forefront of the party.

Iguess then that the democratic party realizes that their ideas and positions are so vacuous and without substance, they must attack the republs weakest point to gain traction.