Balloon guy, on 08 June 2012 - 08:49 AM, said:
Union Worker Protests In Wi
#1161
Posted 08 June 2012 - 01:31 PM
#1162
Posted 09 June 2012 - 04:12 AM
mrdannyg, on 08 June 2012 - 01:31 PM, said:



#1163
Posted 14 September 2012 - 08:14 PM
State court judge strikes down Walker's entire law. Plot twist.
#1164
Posted 15 September 2012 - 04:07 PM
CaneBrain, on 14 September 2012 - 08:14 PM, said:
State court judge strikes down Walker's entire law. Plot twist.
That's terrible news for Democrats in the upcoming election, especially in WI.
SuitedAces21, on 20 August 2012 - 11:14 AM, said:
Essay21, on 25 February 2013 - 08:32 PM, said:
#1167
Posted 15 September 2012 - 04:23 PM
Walker just went through a recall. He ended up with more votes than the first time, by a lot. The OVERWHELMING reason given by people on the ground here is WI is because of the union situation. If a random liberal judge throws it out, it's just going to solidify everyone even more. I mean, there is almost no way that WI is going Obama anyway, because everyone up here seems to like Paul Ryan (I see his name on signs all over the place and I don't even know the name of the person running against him*). But this will bring out the Walker and Ryan people in full force as a '**** you' to that judge.
*He's concurrently running for Congress and VP. I'm talking Congressionally. I know he's running against Obama in the national race.
SuitedAces21, on 20 August 2012 - 11:14 AM, said:
Essay21, on 25 February 2013 - 08:32 PM, said:
#1168
Posted 15 September 2012 - 04:26 PM
Your biased reasoning is kinda obvious since you assign Obama little chance of winning a state he has led in the polls wire to wire and won handily in 2008.
#1169
Posted 15 September 2012 - 04:44 PM
CaneBrain, on 15 September 2012 - 04:26 PM, said:
Your biased reasoning is kinda obvious since you assign Obama little chance of winning a state he has led in the polls wire to wire and won handily in 2008.
In his previous race he won by 5.8%, in the recall he won by 7%. That's a lot of votes, considering 2.5 million people voted.
As you know it doesn't matter what happened in 2008, especially since the VP candidate is a sitting congressman from the state.
SuitedAces21, on 20 August 2012 - 11:14 AM, said:
Essay21, on 25 February 2013 - 08:32 PM, said:
#1170
Posted 15 September 2012 - 04:51 PM
#1171
Posted 15 September 2012 - 05:22 PM
SuitedAces21, on 20 August 2012 - 11:14 AM, said:
Essay21, on 25 February 2013 - 08:32 PM, said:
#1172
Posted 15 September 2012 - 05:31 PM
Full disclosure, Nate Silver has Obama as a 83% favorite to win Wisconsin.
#1173
Posted 15 September 2012 - 06:02 PM
CaneBrain, on 15 September 2012 - 05:31 PM, said:
Full disclosure, Nate Silver has Obama as a 83% favorite to win Wisconsin.
Then you should give me odds!
SuitedAces21, on 20 August 2012 - 11:14 AM, said:
Essay21, on 25 February 2013 - 08:32 PM, said:
#1174
Posted 16 September 2012 - 05:24 AM
brvheart, on 15 September 2012 - 06:02 PM, said:
I just wanted to be fair.....if you recall, you gave Obama "almost no way" to win Wisconsin. $20 straight up if you want it.
#1175
Posted 16 September 2012 - 06:44 AM
CaneBrain, on 16 September 2012 - 05:24 AM, said:
Sounds good. (This is for just WI, not the entire election)
SuitedAces21, on 20 August 2012 - 11:14 AM, said:
Essay21, on 25 February 2013 - 08:32 PM, said:
#1176
Posted 16 September 2012 - 08:49 AM
brvheart, on 16 September 2012 - 06:44 AM, said:
Wimp
“Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.” ― George Orwell
#1180
Posted 17 September 2012 - 07:39 PM
CaneBrain, on 17 September 2012 - 03:55 PM, said:
I enjoy them
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









