47 replies to this topic

[SAM_Hard8]

NO at Sea - Doesn't matter how many points they get the hawks get crushed. NO by 21Jets at Indy - Obviously I'm a homer. One of the teams gets an early big lead and the other is forced to come back. Either way it's the Colts by 3.Bal at KC - I think KC has a chance to pull off an upset (wouldn't surprise me) but they will fall short. Baltimore by 3GB at Philly - Vic lays a turd Green Bay by 14.

[Skeleton Jelly]

NO > Seattle bigIndy > Jets mediumBal > KC bigGB > Philly small

[CaneBrain]

Saints 33 --- Seattle 21Colts 28 --- Jets 27Ravens 30 --- Chiefs 10Eagles 20 --- GB 17 (OT)

[brvheart]

SaintsJetsChiefsPackers

[SBriand]

NOColtsChiefsEagles

[SGFULTON83]

Seattle: 23-20 OTIndy: 27-17Baltimore: 20-7Green Bay: 30-17I don't care who wins but I would like to see good games across the board. Might have to drop a little money on Seattle to win the Super Bowl simply because of the odds.

[Skeleton Jelly]

SGFULTON83, on Friday, January 7th, 2011, 12:35 PM, said:

I don't care who wins but I would like to see good games across the board.

This is how I feel except I really don't like the Jets, so I hope they lose.I also really want one of these games to go to overtime and then have the receiving team play just for the FG because they forgot about the new OT rules and then they all start celebrating afterwards and have to be told that the game is still going on and then the other team scores a TD to win.

[custom36]

Seahawks 23-17Colts 27-17Ravens 20-7Iggles 34-20Even if the Seahawks lose, they're not going to get crushed given the NO injuries/travel/loud stadium. I'm really banking on Julius Jones blowing the game for them - he did it for us for 2 years.

[wsox8]

NO at Sea - NO 31-17Jets at Indy: NYJ 17-14Bal at KC: Balt 27-21GB at Philly: GB 24-14

[CaneBrain]

custom36, on Friday, January 7th, 2011, 5:42 PM, said:

Even if the Seahawks lose, they're not going to get crushed given the NO injuries/travel/loud stadium.

well predicted.I did not expect Seattle to play so well on offense or NO to play so poorly on defense.

[SuitedAces21]

CaneBrain, on Saturday, January 8th, 2011, 6:07 PM, said:

I did not expect Seattle to play so well on offense or NO to play so poorly on defense.

that's becuase there was no evidence that the seahawks could play this well. all the data pointed towards NO winning.

[custom36]

SuitedAces21, on Saturday, January 8th, 2011, 6:50 PM, said:

that's becuase there was no evidence that the seahawks could play this well. all the data pointed towards NO winning.

The data didn't account for this man...

[SAM_Hard8]

0-2Fans of the Ravens and Packers should be afraid.

[CaneBrain]

Yeah, I'm pretty glad I don't go out to Vegas until Monday because I would have lost some money yesterday. Sorry in advance to Ravens and Eagles fans.edit: epic reverse jinx. Cmon Chiefs, kick a FG so I can have one perfect prediction.

[Pot Odds RAC]

Well, at least I can watch all of the games next weekend. I've been refusing to watch any of the Eagles games when a certain player has been starting at QB.

[wsox8]

wsox8, on Friday, January 7th, 2011, 4:44 PM, said:

NO at Sea - NO 31-17Jets at Indy: NYJ 17-14Bal at KC: Balt 27-21GB at Philly: GB 24-14

ehh I wasn't that far off.

[Skeleton Jelly]

Skeleton Jelly, on Friday, January 7th, 2011, 11:33 AM, said:

NO > Seattle bigIndy > Jets mediumBal > KC bigGB > Philly small

Boo Saturday.Hooray Sunday.Pitt > Balt smallGB > Atlanta smallChicago > Seattle bigNE > NY medium

[SBriand]

0-4 weeeePittNEPackersSeattle

[Skeleton Jelly]

SBriand, on Monday, January 10th, 2011, 11:37 AM, said:

PackersSeattle

I hope this happens just so we can have the 9-9 Seahawks hosting the NFC Championship.

[brvheart]

Patriots (I'm guessing a 14 to 17 point victory)Seahawks (Only if Hasselbeck plays decently. As in 250 yards, 1 int, 2 td's)Steelers (Also a 14 to 17 point victory)Packers (Solid win ~7 points)