Jump to content


Degenerate Gambling


  • Please log in to reply
2853 replies to this topic

#2801 Dubey

Dubey

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 10,921 posts
  • Location:Lethbridge, Alberta

Posted 04 November 2017 - 07:12 AM

Week 9 bets:

Dallas PK $9,700
Seattle -7.5 $100
New Orleans -7 $100
Rams -3.5 $100


I liked Dallas as a pick'em before the Zeke news. I was debating between them and the Seahawks for my all-in bet. Since the lines lock for this pool on Friday morning, I'm getting them at a pick'em when the vegas line is dallas -2.5 now. I don't actually think any running back is worth more than maybe 1 point on a spread, but 1 point in this case is a good tie breaker between 2 bets I liked equally. Plus, if I'm going to go out, I may as well go down swinging on my boys.

#2802 Dubey

Dubey

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 10,921 posts
  • Location:Lethbridge, Alberta

Posted 04 November 2017 - 07:15 AM

View PostDubey, on 23 October 2017 - 08:53 AM, said:

nice. I had been on a good run, just trying to run up a freeroll win on my own account. won $7 on a freeroll in week 2. doubled up to $14 in week 3, then $28 in week 4, then $56 in week 5, then up to $110 in week 6.

My double up lineup lost this week though. Luckily I didn't go for the full double again as I wasn't feeling great about my lineup. Back down to $50 now.

Forgot to post. I doubled up again last week to get back to $100, and I'm all in this week (purely double ups), looking to double up again.

this is my cash lineup (currently)

QB Jared Goff $5,500
RB Zeke Elliot $9,000
RB Mark Ingram $7,600
WR Dez Bryant $6,400
WR TY Hilton $4,900
WR M. Sanu $5,300
TE Jack Doyle $4,300
FLEX Vernon Davis $4,100
DST Broncos $2,600


#2803 iBeaver

iBeaver

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,601 posts

Posted 04 November 2017 - 07:56 AM

I have a few different lineups.

I have a Brees/Ingram/Thomas stack, Dak/Zeke/Dez stack, and a Goff/Gurley/Watkins stack. Doyle is my TE on all lineups.


#2804 Dubey

Dubey

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 10,921 posts
  • Location:Lethbridge, Alberta

Posted 05 November 2017 - 07:23 AM

View PostDubey, on 04 November 2017 - 07:15 AM, said:



Forgot to post. I doubled up again last week to get back to $100, and I'm all in this week (purely double ups), looking to double up again.

this is my cash lineup (currently)

QB Jared Goff $5,500
RB Zeke Elliot $9,000
RB Mark Ingram $7,600
WR Dez Bryant $6,400
WR TY Hilton $4,900
WR M. Sanu $5,300
TE Jack Doyle $4,300
FLEX Vernon Davis $4,100
DST Broncos $2,600

Made some changes:

Out:
Sanu
Broncos D
Goff

In:
Curtis Samuel
Dak Prescott
Jags D

#2805 pezeveng

pezeveng

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,377 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:in the freezer

Posted 05 November 2017 - 09:33 AM

Lots of money on the Rams and Cowboys this week. Books have more liability on the Rams than any other game.

I have this feeling Denver D has a big game, I took the under as its dropped from 44 to 41.5.

My picks this week are Giants +6, Philly under 41.5, Indy under 45.

#2806 iBeaver

iBeaver

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,601 posts

Posted 05 November 2017 - 12:26 PM

My best lineup so far:

Goff
Gurley
Mcaffery
Dez
Watkins
Thomas
Doyle
Walsh
Jax


#2807 pezeveng

pezeveng

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,377 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:in the freezer

Posted 05 November 2017 - 03:27 PM

There use to be a time when fading the public and following line moves were golden.


I wonder sometimes when sportsbooks drop the line like that, does it entice more bets to the over or the under. If that game stays at 44 I don't even look at it.

I would love to see each sportsbooks numbers when they drop an o/u by 1, 2, and 3 points.

Do you guys follow the line move or see value on taking the over when the line drops like that?

#2808 Dubey

Dubey

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 10,921 posts
  • Location:Lethbridge, Alberta

Posted 05 November 2017 - 04:48 PM

View PostDubey, on 05 November 2017 - 07:23 AM, said:



Made some changes:

Out:
Sanu
Broncos D
Goff

In:
Curtis Samuel
Dak Prescott
Jags D

Whew. Haven't crunched the numbers but I'm pretty sure my swaps cost me a few points.


Barely hung on for nearly a full double up. Dropped out of the money in 1 tourney but won $180.

Also, my GPP lineup won $1500 on my brothers account. I haven't done the math but if Baldwin came down with that Hail Mary we would have been close to the top of the milly maker. Finished with 184 points, I think first place was around 210 and we had Baldwin and Russ. I think t would have been worth 25ish points. Obviously first place would probably change with that play so we wouldn't have won or anything but could have been a 5-6 figure score I think

#2809 Dubey

Dubey

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 10,921 posts
  • Location:Lethbridge, Alberta

Posted 07 November 2017 - 08:55 AM

Week 9 bets:

Dallas PK $9,700 WIN
Seattle -7.5 $100 LOSS
New Orleans -7 $100 WIN
Rams -3.5 $100 WIN

new balance: $19,800 (18th place)

JT Miller is unstoppable and is up to $170,000. Looks like the entire pool had a good week. I might have to start setting my sights on 2nd place. (Still pays about $3,000)


#2810 Dubey

Dubey

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 10,921 posts
  • Location:Lethbridge, Alberta

Posted 10 November 2017 - 03:53 PM

Week 10 bets:

Dallas +3 $7,000
Washington +1.5 $6,000
NY Giants -2.5 $6,000
Indianapolis +10.5 $800

#2811 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 37,756 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 12 November 2017 - 08:27 AM

I have a voucher for FanDual for football that has to be submitted by 1:00 today. Any player suggestions? I know nothing.
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

#2812 Dubey

Dubey

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 10,921 posts
  • Location:Lethbridge, Alberta

Posted 12 November 2017 - 09:02 AM

Bilall Powell
Garrett celek

#2813 Dubey

Dubey

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 10,921 posts
  • Location:Lethbridge, Alberta

Posted 12 November 2017 - 09:06 AM

My cash lineup for this week, putting it in $160 of double ups on DK

QB Matt Stafford $6800
RB Leveon Bell $9800
RB Bilall Powell $4000
WR Chris Godwin $3000
WR AJ Green $7700
WR Golden Tate $6800
TE Garrett Celek $2500
Flex Marvin Jones Jr $6200
DEF Bears $3000




#2814 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 37,756 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 12 November 2017 - 09:21 AM

Here's what I got after a quick look at some stats...

QB T. Brady NE
RB L. Fournette JAC
RB A. Morris DAL
WR TY Hilton IND
WR M. Jones Jr. DET
WR P. Dorsett NE
TE Gronk NE
K G. Zuerlein LAR
D Jaguars


Anything absolutely stupid?
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

#2815 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 37,756 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 12 November 2017 - 09:25 AM

View PostDubey, on 12 November 2017 - 09:02 AM, said:

Bilall Powell
Garrett celek

Celek getting a start against a defense who rewards TEs....if I replace Gronk with Celek which position should I upgrade?
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

#2816 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 37,756 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 12 November 2017 - 09:26 AM

I think Dorsett is my answer
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

#2817 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 37,756 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 12 November 2017 - 09:31 AM



QB T. Brady NE
RB L. Fournette JAC
RB A. Morris DAL
WR TY Hilton IND
WR M. Jones Jr. DET
WR D. Hopkins HOU
TE Celek
K G. Zuerlein LAR
D Jaguars


Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

#2818 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 37,756 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 12 November 2017 - 09:32 AM

And now I realize I just took out 2 of my QB targets lol
Ffs
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

#2819 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 37,756 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 12 November 2017 - 11:54 AM

The leader has 107.22
I have 6.6
LOL
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

#2820 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 37,756 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 12 November 2017 - 01:14 PM

JAX seems good at taking bad penalties.
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users