Jump to content


Nhl Changes, New Rules


  • Please log in to reply
177 replies to this topic

#1 serge

serge

    Leafs nation Grand Poobah

  • Members
  • 32,225 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 10 March 2010 - 08:49 AM

So it looks like we have a couple of things coming...

The headshot rule is going to pass..No more hitting from side and behind.

Also a new rule is being passed regarding OT :

Real_ESPNLeBrun just spoke with Jackets GM Scott Howson whose tiebreak change went through with a unanimous vote by GMs today. It penalizes shootout wins
Under the tiebreak change, which still needs BOG approval in June, only regulation and overtime wins now count in the tiebreak formula
Leafs 2011-2012 North Eastern Division Champions.

#2 serge

serge

    Leafs nation Grand Poobah

  • Members
  • 32,225 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 10 March 2010 - 08:53 AM

A lateral, back pressure or blindside hit to an opponent where the head is targeted and or the principal point of contact is not permitted.

A violation of the above will result in a minor or major penalty and shall be reviewed for possible supplemental discipline

Leafs 2011-2012 North Eastern Division Champions.

#3 gruven

gruven

    The Poker Show on Sportsnet Radio Fan590

  • Members
  • 7,679 posts
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 10 March 2010 - 08:55 AM

QUOTE (serge @ Wednesday, March 10th, 2010, 11:53 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
A lateral, back pressure or blindside hit to an opponent where the head is targeted and or the principal point of contact is not permitted.

A violation of the above will result in a minor or major penalty and shall be reviewed for possible supplemental discipline

It sounds to me like a cop-out by the NHL. Instead of putting in a hard and fast 'NO HEAD HITS' rule like the NFL, they put in a rule is completely open for interpretation, and therefore susceptible to non-enforcement. The NHLPA was flat out lobbying for no head hits, while the BOG didn't want to put in any rule at all except for equipment changes to shoulder pads.
The Poker Show on Sportsnet Fan590




The Rick Tocchet Experience
Proud Member Since October 2008

#4 serge

serge

    Leafs nation Grand Poobah

  • Members
  • 32,225 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:01 AM

The NHL will request that the American Hockey League to go to a four-man officiating system in 40 per cent of AHL games. The AHL currently uses three-man system for all games. The final decision belongs to the AHL but the NHL is prepared to support it, financially and otherwise.
Leafs 2011-2012 North Eastern Division Champions.

#5 serge

serge

    Leafs nation Grand Poobah

  • Members
  • 32,225 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:04 AM

QUOTE (gruven @ Wednesday, March 10th, 2010, 9:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It sounds to me like a cop-out by the NHL. Instead of putting in a hard and fast 'NO HEAD HITS' rule like the NFL, they put in a rule is completely open for interpretation, and therefore susceptible to non-enforcement. The NHLPA was flat out lobbying for no head hits, while the BOG didn't want to put in any rule at all except for equipment changes to shoulder pads.

yes totally agree...Under this rule, Stevens/Lindros hit is legal...

Also saying the referee can give out a 2 minute minor is not much of a deterrent..They need to ban ALL head hits like you say.

This seems like a political move, to make it seem like they are doing something.
Leafs 2011-2012 North Eastern Division Champions.

#6 Dubey

Dubey

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,108 posts
  • Location:Lethbridge, Alberta

Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:18 AM

I love the idea of an 8 team mini series for the final playoff spot. (blah blah, leafs fan, blah blah)

I also love the idea for an 8-minute OT, 4 min 4-on-4, and then 3-on-3.


I doubt either will ever happen though.

#7 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 28,822 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:42 AM

QUOTE (Dubey @ Wednesday, March 10th, 2010, 12:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I love the idea of an 8 team mini series for the final playoff spot. (blah blah, leafs fan, blah blah)

I also love the idea for an 8-minute OT, 4 min 4-on-4, and then 3-on-3.


I doubt either will ever happen though.

Really, what's the point of that? The whole season is a battle for the playoffs.

#8 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 36,829 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thunder Bay, ON

Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:47 AM

Yeah, I think it's the worst thing ever, to be honest.

I don't care for the 8 minute OT, either. I'd take 8 or 10 minutes of 4 on 4, but I don't want to see 3 on 3. That's just as gimicky as the shootout, as far as I'm concerned.

Like I've said before, I love the shootout. It's entertaining.
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#9 serge

serge

    Leafs nation Grand Poobah

  • Members
  • 32,225 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:58 AM

If the new tiebreaking rule was implemented last year, the Habs would of missed the playoffs and the Panthers would be the 8th seed.
Leafs 2011-2012 North Eastern Division Champions.

#10 Dubey

Dubey

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,108 posts
  • Location:Lethbridge, Alberta

Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:59 AM

QUOTE (digitalmonkey @ Wednesday, March 10th, 2010, 10:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Really, what's the point of that? The whole season is a battle for the playoffs.




It would focus the battle on the 7th position instead of 8th. It's not like a 1/8 chance of getting the 8th seed is enough to settle for for any team, but it would sure make things exciting for a lot more teams come playoff time.


Honestly, it's just 5 years of no playoff hockey speaking more than anything, but I don't think it's a terrible idea.

#11 serge

serge

    Leafs nation Grand Poobah

  • Members
  • 32,225 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:05 AM

QUOTE (Dubey @ Wednesday, March 10th, 2010, 10:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It would focus the battle on the 7th position instead of 8th. It's not like a 1/8 chance of getting the 8th seed is enough to settle for for any team, but it would sure make things exciting for a lot more teams come playoff time.


Honestly, it's just 5 years of no playoff hockey speaking more than anything, but I don't think it's a terrible idea.

i think it would be great...A little bit of march madness, and you can still "tank" and have a shot at some playoff action. Arp would love it.
Leafs 2011-2012 North Eastern Division Champions.

#12 Dubey

Dubey

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,108 posts
  • Location:Lethbridge, Alberta

Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:07 AM

Plus, as for as selling the game in the U.S. is concerned, Americans love their single game knockout formats.

#13 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 28,822 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:07 AM

QUOTE (serge @ Wednesday, March 10th, 2010, 1:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i think it would be great...A little bit of march madness, and you can still "tank" and have a shot at some playoff action. Arp would love it.

teams tank to get a better draft choice. This idea is to have teams battle for the final playoff spot so it obviously affects the standings.

This is a dumb idea...I can't believe I'm discussing it.

#14 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 28,822 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:11 AM

QUOTE (serge @ Wednesday, March 10th, 2010, 1:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i think it would be great...A little bit of march madness, and you can still "tank" and have a shot at some playoff action. Arp would love it.

What are the other teams doing while this is going in?

#15 serge

serge

    Leafs nation Grand Poobah

  • Members
  • 32,225 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:12 AM

QUOTE (digitalmonkey @ Wednesday, March 10th, 2010, 11:07 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
teams tank to get a better draft choice. This idea is to have teams battle for the final playoff spot so it obviously affects the standings.

This is a dumb idea...I can't believe I'm discussing it.

Take it up with Garth Snow..He devised the idea.
Leafs 2011-2012 North Eastern Division Champions.

#16 digitalmonkey

digitalmonkey

    Unenjoyable Annoying Retard

  • Members
  • 28,822 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury
  • Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago

Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:13 AM

QUOTE (Dubey @ Wednesday, March 10th, 2010, 1:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Plus, as for as selling the game in the U.S. is concerned, Americans love their single game knockout formats.

How about a singing contest for the final playoff spot? They love American idol too. Or maybe Crosby can be given roses to hand out.

#17 Dubey

Dubey

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,108 posts
  • Location:Lethbridge, Alberta

Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:16 AM

QUOTE (digitalmonkey @ Wednesday, March 10th, 2010, 11:11 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What are the other teams doing while this is going in?



It would only be 4 nights worth of games. It could be done in one week. a 1-week break before the playoffs start is pretty close to standard anyway.

#18 serge

serge

    Leafs nation Grand Poobah

  • Members
  • 32,225 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:18 AM

QUOTE (digitalmonkey @ Wednesday, March 10th, 2010, 11:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
How about a singing contest for the final playoff spot? They love American idol too. Or maybe Crosby can be given roses to hand out.

is it any different than having a penalty shooting contest decide the winner of a game?
Leafs 2011-2012 North Eastern Division Champions.

#19 JoeyJoJo

JoeyJoJo

    On the road to 8,143 (approximately)

  • Members
  • 8,139 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Springfield

Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:18 AM

QUOTE (digitalmonkey @ Wednesday, March 10th, 2010, 10:07 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
teams tank to get a better draft choice. This idea is to have teams battle for the final playoff spot so it obviously affects the standings.

This is a dumb idea...I can't believe I'm discussing it.

Bill Simmons suggested something like this a few years ago (when his Celtics were openly tanking to try to get a better draft pick to get Greg Oden or Kevin Durant).


"Shorten the regular season by four games, guarantee the top six seeds in each conference, then have a double-elimination tourney for the seventh and eighth seeds between the remaining 15 teams. I suggest this for five reasons. First, it would be entertaining as hell. In fact, that's what we'll call it: the Entertaining-as-Hell Tournament. Second, I'm pretty sure we could get it sponsored. Third, the top 12 teams get a reward: two weeks of rest while the tournament plays out.

Fourth, a Cinderella squad could pull off some upsets, grab an eighth seed and win fans along the way. And fifth, with the Entertaining-as-Hell Tournament giving everyone a chance, no team could tank down the stretch without insulting paying customers beyond repair. That's the lamest thing about tanking: not that it's morally unsound, but that fans pay full price to see a depleted group of losers with dubious intentions. At a recent Bobcats-Celtics game, my father (a 34-year season ticket-holder) watched Boston toss away a double-digit lead while Pierce and Jefferson watched from the bench. To his right, a fan screamed at Doc Rivers, "You're doing the right thing!" To his left, another fan screamed that the collapse was "an absolute disgrace!" And as my father told me later, the disturbing thing was that both guys were right."


Homer: Moe, I need your advice.
Moe: Yeah?
Homer: See, I got this friend named... Joey Jo Jo... Junior... Shabadoo.
Moe: That's the worst name I ever heard.

#20 Dubey

Dubey

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,108 posts
  • Location:Lethbridge, Alberta

Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:19 AM

QUOTE (digitalmonkey @ Wednesday, March 10th, 2010, 11:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
How about a singing contest for the final playoff spot? They love American idol too. Or maybe Crosby can be given roses to hand out.



Meh, this is a weak.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users