runthemover 40 Posted March 5, 2010 Share Posted March 5, 2010 I saw this last night (in 3D) and itwas as good as expected (if not more (? more good? (oh I'd better stop (better is right)))It's quite fun. 3D is berry good. Link to post Share on other sites
JoeyJoJo 20 Posted March 5, 2010 Share Posted March 5, 2010 it was as good as expectedDon't we need to know what you expected now? Link to post Share on other sites
LongLiveYorke 38 Posted March 5, 2010 Share Posted March 5, 2010 Don't we need to know what you expected now?Double Link to post Share on other sites
runthemover 40 Posted March 5, 2010 Author Share Posted March 5, 2010 The rhythm is the base and the base is the It was berry berry good to meAlso, after you watch, answer me this Is the courtyard where the party is happening at the beginning the same from History of the World Part I (where we meet Count de Monet and they have the chess board thing. In Alice it's a dance floor) Link to post Share on other sites
El Guapo 10 Posted March 5, 2010 Share Posted March 5, 2010 What is the youngest you think a child could be to watch this?When I saw they were coming out with this I was excited, but then when I saw the Johnny Depp was playing his crazy character, I didn't want to really see it anymore. Am I wrong about this? Link to post Share on other sites
Pot Odds RAC 23 Posted March 5, 2010 Share Posted March 5, 2010 I've never been a big Tim Burton fan. Doubly so when he teams with Johnny Depp (who I generally like when not associated with Burton).This is probably a good project for him, but I think I'll likely pass. Link to post Share on other sites
Mercury69 3 Posted March 5, 2010 Share Posted March 5, 2010 I saw this last night (in 3D) and itwas as good as expected (if not more (? more good? (oh I'd better stop (better is right)))It's quite fun. 3D is berry good.It's OK, you're probably still high on the 'shrooms... Link to post Share on other sites
Southern Buddhist 1 Posted March 8, 2010 Share Posted March 8, 2010 Planning to see it this week.I've always wanted a shirt with the classic Alice illustration below, only instead of the bottle she would be holding the cake and the caption would be really large, like so:EAT ME Link to post Share on other sites
Jeepster80125 0 Posted March 8, 2010 Share Posted March 8, 2010 Saw it in 3D, it was, ok.The story was decent enough and the special effects were pretty good. I especially like the cheshire cat. The effects didn't impress me at all. It seems about 1 in 10 scenes was completely CGI, and those 3D scenes looked great. But I feel like the rest of the 3D effects were just normal shots, edited to make closer object sharp and further objects blurry. It didn't feel very authentic for me, when sometimes the effects were good but most of the time they were meh. It was no avatar, effects-wise. I was (really) high, and it was an above average experience, even with what I've said above. Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted March 8, 2010 Share Posted March 8, 2010 What is the youngest you think a child could be to watch this?When I saw they were coming out with this I was excited, but then when I saw the Johnny Depp was playing his crazy character, I didn't want to really see it anymore. Am I wrong about this?wondering about this as well..I am thinking its not for my 5 year old, as the preview had some semi scary stuff for young kids. Link to post Share on other sites
Jeepster80125 0 Posted March 8, 2010 Share Posted March 8, 2010 Not a kids movie imo. But I have no idea where the cutoff would be. There were some disturbing images and it's definitely not for young kids.Read the synopsis here. That's a fairly messed up story. I'll stop commenting on kids questions though, since I don't have any. Link to post Share on other sites
JoeyJoJo 20 Posted March 8, 2010 Share Posted March 8, 2010 For what it's worth, Netflix rates it as for ages 11+. (The Disney version was rated for 4+.) Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted March 8, 2010 Share Posted March 8, 2010 For what it's worth, Netflix rates it as for ages 11+. (The Disney version was rated for 4+.)Wasn't that 4+ hits of acid? Link to post Share on other sites
BaseJester 1 Posted March 8, 2010 Share Posted March 8, 2010 The effects didn't impress me at all. It seems about 1 in 10 scenes was completely CGI, and those 3D scenes looked great. But I feel like the rest of the 3D effects were just normal shots, edited to make closer object sharp and further objects blurry. It didn't feel very authentic for me, when sometimes the effects were good but most of the time they were meh. It was no avatar, effects-wise. It seems very weird to me that you put spoiler tags around that comment. And I just watched a movie with a floating cat. Link to post Share on other sites
Jeepster80125 0 Posted March 8, 2010 Share Posted March 8, 2010 It seems very weird to me that you put spoiler tags around that comment. And I just watched a movie with a floating cat.I wasn't sure how people would view info that could be interpreted as a spoiler. No reason really, it's easy to do, and removes all doubt. I just didn't want anyone to read that and think, 'damn, that's a spoiler.'. Sometimes, bitches be hatin'.If it matters, I'm (really) high, again. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now