2009 Oscar Nominations

[brvheart 1,768]

The person or thing highlighted is who I would like to win, even if odds are terrible.Actor in a Leading Role * Jeff Bridges in “Crazy Heart” * George Clooney in “Up in the Air” * Colin Firth in “A Single Man” * Morgan Freeman in “Invictus” * Jeremy Renner in “The Hurt Locker”Actor in a Supporting Role * Matt Damon in “Invictus” * Woody Harrelson in “The Messenger” * Christopher Plummer in “The Last Station” * Stanley Tucci in “The Lovely Bones” * Christoph Waltz in “Inglourious Basterds”Actress in a Leading Role * Sandra Bullock in “The Blind Side” * Helen Mirren in “The Last Station” * Carey Mulligan in “An Education” * Gabourey Sidibe in “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” * Meryl Streep in “Julie & Julia”Actress in a Supporting Role * Penélope Cruz in “Nine” * Vera Farmiga in “Up in the Air” * Maggie Gyllenhaal in “Crazy Heart” * Anna Kendrick in “Up in the Air” * Mo’Nique in “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire”Animated Feature Film * “Coraline” Henry Selick * “Fantastic Mr. Fox” Wes Anderson * “The Princess and the Frog” John Musker and Ron Clements * “The Secret of Kells” Tomm Moore * “Up” Pete DocterArt Direction * “Avatar” Art Direction: Rick Carter and Robert Stromberg; Set Decoration: Kim Sinclair * “The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” Art Direction: Dave Warren and Anastasia Masaro; Set Decoration: Caroline Smith * “Nine” Art Direction: John Myhre; Set Decoration: Gordon Sim * “Sherlock Holmes” Art Direction: Sarah Greenwood; Set Decoration: Katie Spencer * “The Young Victoria” Art Direction: Patrice Vermette; Set Decoration: Maggie GrayCinematography * “Avatar” Mauro Fiore * “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince” Bruno Delbonnel * “The Hurt Locker” Barry Ackroyd * “Inglourious Basterds” Robert Richardson * “The White Ribbon” Christian BergerCostume Design * “Bright Star” Janet Patterson * “Coco before Chanel” Catherine Leterrier * “The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” Monique Prudhomme * “Nine” Colleen Atwood * “The Young Victoria” Sandy PowellDirecting * “Avatar” James Cameron * “The Hurt Locker” Kathryn Bigelow (It would obviously be ok if Cameron won also, but I just don't like him and it would be great if the woman he cheated on beat him.) * “Inglourious Basterds” Quentin Tarantino * “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Lee Daniels * “Up in the Air” Jason ReitmanDocumentary (Feature) * “Burma VJ” Anders Østergaard and Lise Lense-Møller * “The Cove” Nominees to be determined * “Food, Inc.” Robert Kenner and Elise Pearlstein (This is the only nominee that I've seen) * “The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers” Judith Ehrlich and Rick Goldsmith * “Which Way Home” Rebecca CammisaDocumentary (Short Subject) * “China’s Unnatural Disaster: The Tears of Sichuan Province” Jon Alpert and Matthew O’Neill * “The Last Campaign of Governor Booth Gardner” Daniel Junge and Henry Ansbacher * “The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant” Steven Bognar and Julia Reichert * “Music by Prudence” Roger Ross Williams and Elinor Burkett * “Rabbit à la Berlin” Bartek Konopka and Anna WydraFilm Editing * “Avatar” Stephen Rivkin, John Refoua and James Cameron * “District 9” Julian Clarke * “The Hurt Locker” Bob Murawski and Chris Innis (I can't give an editing award to a movie that's almost 3 hours long. I'd be great with a QT win here also.) * “Inglourious Basterds” Sally Menke * “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Joe KlotzForeign Language Film * “Ajami” Israel * “El Secreto de Sus Ojos” Argentina * “The Milk of Sorrow” Peru * “Un Prophète” France * “The White Ribbon” Germany (Again, the only one I've seen on this list.)Makeup * “Il Divo” Aldo Signoretti and Vittorio Sodano * “Star Trek” Barney Burman, Mindy Hall and Joel Harlow * “The Young Victoria” Jon Henry Gordon and Jenny ShircoreMusic (Original Score) * “Avatar” James Horner * “Fantastic Mr. Fox” Alexandre Desplat * “The Hurt Locker” Marco Beltrami and Buck Sanders * “Sherlock Holmes” Hans Zimmer * “Up” Michael GiacchinoMusic (Original Song) * “Almost There” from “The Princess and the Frog” Music and Lyric by Randy Newman * “Down in New Orleans” from “The Princess and the Frog” Music and Lyric by Randy Newman * “Loin de Paname” from “Paris 36” Music by Reinhardt Wagner Lyric by Frank Thomas * “Take It All” from “Nine” Music and Lyric by Maury Yeston * “The Weary Kind (Theme from Crazy Heart)” from “Crazy Heart” Music and Lyric by Ryan Bingham and T Bone BurnettBest Picture * “Avatar” James Cameron and Jon Landau, Producers * “The Blind Side” Nominees to be determined * “District 9” Peter Jackson and Carolynne Cunningham, Producers * “An Education” Finola Dwyer and Amanda Posey, Producers * “The Hurt Locker” Nominees to be determined * “Inglourious Basterds” Lawrence Bender, Producer * “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Lee Daniels, Sarah Siegel-Magness and Gary Magness, Producers * “A Serious Man” Joel Coen and Ethan Coen, Producers * “Up” Jonas Rivera, Producer * “Up in the Air” Daniel Dubiecki, Ivan Reitman and Jason Reitman, ProducersShort Film (Animated) * “French Roast” Fabrice O. Joubert * “Granny O’Grimm’s Sleeping Beauty” Nicky Phelan and Darragh O’Connell * “The Lady and the Reaper (La Dama y la Muerte)” Javier Recio Gracia * “Logorama” Nicolas Schmerkin * “A Matter of Loaf and Death” Nick ParkShort Film (Live Action) * “The Door” Juanita Wilson and James Flynn * “Instead of Abracadabra” Patrik Eklund and Mathias Fjellström * “Kavi” Gregg Helvey * “Miracle Fish” Luke Doolan and Drew Bailey * “The New Tenants” Joachim Back and Tivi MagnussonSound Editing * “Avatar” Christopher Boyes and Gwendolyn Yates Whittle * “The Hurt Locker” Paul N.J. Ottosson * “Inglourious Basterds” Wylie Stateman * “Star Trek” Mark Stoeckinger and Alan Rankin * “Up” Michael Silvers and Tom MyersSound Mixing (Does anyone know what this means? How does it differ from Sound Editing?) * “Avatar” Christopher Boyes, Gary Summers, Andy Nelson and Tony Johnson * “The Hurt Locker” Paul N.J. Ottosson and Ray Beckett * “Inglourious Basterds” Michael Minkler, Tony Lamberti and Mark Ulano * “Star Trek” Anna Behlmer, Andy Nelson and Peter J. Devlin * “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” Greg P. Russell, Gary Summers and Geoffrey PattersonVisual Effects * “Avatar” Joe Letteri, Stephen Rosenbaum, Richard Baneham and Andrew R. Jones * “District 9” Dan Kaufman, Peter Muyzers, Robert Habros and Matt Aitken * “Star Trek” Roger Guyett, Russell Earl, Paul Kavanagh and Burt DaltonWriting (Adapted Screenplay) * “District 9” Written by Neill Blomkamp and Terri Tatchell * “An Education” Screenplay by Nick Hornby * “In the Loop” Screenplay by Jesse Armstrong, Simon Blackwell, Armando Iannucci, Tony Roche * “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Screenplay by Geoffrey Fletcher * “Up in the Air” Screenplay by Jason Reitman and Sheldon TurnerWriting (Original Screenplay) * “The Hurt Locker” Written by Mark Boal * “Inglourious Basterds” Written by Quentin Tarantino * “The Messenger” Written by Alessandro Camon & Oren Moverman * “A Serious Man” Written by Joel Coen & Ethan Coen * “Up” Screenplay by Bob Peterson, Pete Docter, Story by Pete Docter, Bob Peterson, Tom McCarthyAvatar and The Hurt Locker are leading the Oscar race with nine nominations each.

[BigDMcGee 3,367]

LOL @ adultery informing even your Oscar rooting interests.

[LongLiveYorke 38]

The only one that I even vaguely care about is Christoph Waltz in Inglourious Basterds. If he doesn't win, then nothing makes sense.I think the 10 best picture nominees thing is dumb. It pretty much ensures that Avatar is going to win, in my opinion. All the other movies are going to be watered down, and right now Avatar is the "default" vote. Basterds was my favorite film of last year (I think). But it's not going to win.

[brvheart 1,768]

LOL @ adultery informing even your Oscar rooting interests.

Just in the directing category. I'm ok with Avatar cleaning house on everything else.

[Governator 54]

A female has also never won best director, would be a solid "Halle Berry" moment.There's a lot of movies nominated across the board that I haven't seen. Looks like we'll have some renting to do soon.

[Mercury69 3]

Avatar for Best Picture is such a fucking joke. Visual Effects and Art Direction, maybe, but there are tons of films with more substance than Avatar. Fucking retard Academy.

[JoeyJoJo 20]

Best Picture *"The Blind Side" Nominees to be determined

Wait...really?I mean, I haven't actually seen it, but I had no idea this was even a remote possibility.

[LongLiveYorke 38]

Wait...really?I mean, I haven't actually seen it, but I had no idea this was even a remote possibility.

I think it has to do with the overall crappiness of the Academy Awards.

[runthemover 40]

as everyone knew when they first heard it, the ten nominees thing is retard city. What would be the five if they still had their usual half-sense?* “Avatar” James Cameron and Jon Landau, Producers* “The Blind Side” Nominees to be determined* “District 9” Peter Jackson and Carolynne Cunningham, Producers* “An Education” Finola Dwyer and Amanda Posey, Producers* “The Hurt Locker” Nominees to be determined* “Inglourious Basterds” Lawrence Bender, Producer* “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Lee Daniels, Sarah Siegel-Magness and Gary Magness, Producers* “A Serious Man” Joel Coen and Ethan Coen, Producers* “Up” Jonas Rivera, Producer* “Up in the Air” Daniel Dubiecki, Ivan Reitman and Jason Reitman, ProducersAn EducationThe Hurt LockerInglourious BasterdsPreciousA Serious ManI've only seen THL, IB, and ASM on that list.

[JoeyJoJo 20]

What would be the five if they still had their usual half-sense?

* “Avatar” James Cameron and Jon Landau, Producers* “The Hurt Locker” Nominees to be determined* “Inglourious Basterds” Lawrence Bender, Producer* “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Lee Daniels, Sarah Siegel-Magness and Gary Magness, Producers* “Up in the Air” Daniel Dubiecki, Ivan Reitman and Jason Reitman, ProducersI haven't seen the last two. I think from now on I will refer to Precious as "Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire."

[LadyGrey 8]

Costume Design* “Bright Star” Janet Patterson* “Coco before Chanel” Catherine Leterrier* “The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” Monique Prudhomme* “Nine” Colleen Atwood* “The Young Victoria” Sandy PowellWriting (Adapted Screenplay)* “District 9” Written by Neill Blomkamp and Terri Tatchell* “An Education” Screenplay by Nick Hornby* “In the Loop” Screenplay by Jesse Armstrong, Simon Blackwell, Armando Iannucci, Tony Roche* “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Screenplay by Geoffrey Fletcher* “Up in the Air” Screenplay by Jason Reitman and Sheldon TurnerWriting (Original Screenplay)* “The Hurt Locker” Written by Mark Boal* “Inglourious Basterds” Written by Quentin Tarantino* “The Messenger” Written by Alessandro Camon & Oren Moverman* “A Serious Man” Written by Joel Coen & Ethan Coen* “Up” Screenplay by Bob Peterson, Pete Docter, Story by Pete Docter, Bob Peterson, Tom McCarthyI haven't seen many of the films from 2009 yet (only An Education, A Serious Man, Coco Before Chanel) so I don't have much to say about the categories. I don't necessarily thing they deserve to win everything e.g. Carey isn't the Best Actress and won't win it for sure, but in these categories I do think they are all worthy of winning, whether they actually do or not.What I will say: I don't want Avatar to win Best Picture. I want to see it and I know it will be a cool experience, but it's not a film film, so I think it should win all the effects categories etc but leave the Best Picture to a film with proper actors and camerawork etc. It just doesn't feel right to me for a CGI film to win Best Picture, especially since it's going to win a bunch of other categories anyway.

[Governator 54]

You can't honestly be surprised that Avatar is nominated for best picture lol. I understand the frustration part of it I guess but I'm pretty sure when a movie sets wordwide box office records it's a shoe in.

[frautotenkinder 1,026]

The person or thing highlighted is who I would like to win, even if odds are terrible.Film Editing * “Avatar” Stephen Rivkin, John Refoua and James Cameron * “District 9” Julian Clarke * “The Hurt Locker” Bob Murawski and Chris Innis (I can't give an editing award to a movie that's almost 3 hours long. I'd be great with a QT win here also.) * “Inglourious Basterds” Sally Menke * “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Joe KlotzAvatar and The Hurt Locker are leading the Oscar race with nine nominations each.

Judged on its own, I really liked the editing in Hurt Locker. The film's pacing was spot on, there was a constant feel of danger and chaos, and all of the action scenes were visceral and comprehensible (I mean--I always felt I knew and understood the various levels of danger that were on the screen. Compare/contrast that with Ninja Assasin.)

[Mercury69 3]

You can't honestly be surprised that Avatar is nominated for best picture lol. I understand the frustration part of it I guess but I'm pretty sure when a movie sets wordwide box office records it's a shoe in.

Oh, I'm not surprised. Disappointed is more like it. Making lots of money doesn't equal good movie. And, as I said, there are plenty of movies that are likely better in terms of true filmmaking that could use a leg up at the box office. Nominating Avatar kind of killed that.

[vbnautilus 49]

What I will say: I don't want Avatar to win Best Picture. I want to see it and I know it will be a cool experience, but it's not a film film, so I think it should win all the effects categories etc but leave the Best Picture to a film with proper actors and camerawork etc. It just doesn't feel right to me for a CGI film to win Best Picture, especially since it's going to win a bunch of other categories anyway.

You really have to see it before saying this. I know that what you're saying sounds reasonable, but the movie is just a totally overwhelming experience, and as I have argued (with some futility) its not only because of the effects. I think the academy may not go for it because it feels so commercial, but I do think it deserves to win. Also, while there is plenty of CGI, it is still an "acted" film due to the motion and face capture.

[JoeyJoJo 20]

My "want to win" votes:Actor in a Leading RoleJeremy Renner in “The Hurt Locker”I haven't seen any of the other ones, but I did like him a lot, so sure.Actor in a Supporting RoleChristoph Waltz in “Inglourious Basterds”No brainer for me.Animated Feature Film“Up” Pete DocterDirecting* “Inglourious Basterds” Quentin TarantinoMusic (Original Score)“Up” Michael GiacchinoBest Picture * “Inglourious Basterds” Lawrence Bender, ProducerWriting (Original Screenplay)* “Inglourious Basterds” Written by Quentin Tarantino[/color]Hmm, there seems to be a theme in my picks.

[BigDMcGee 3,367]

What I will say: I don't want Avatar to win Best Picture. I want to see it and I know it will be a cool experience, but it's not a film film, so I think it should win all the effects categories etc but leave the Best Picture to a film with proper actors and camerawork etc. It just doesn't feel right to me for a CGI film to win Best Picture, especially since it's going to win a bunch of other categories anyway.

I hate to break this to you, but the Oscars aren't "Film" film awards. They are movie award. SOme of the movies that have won over the past 20 years are Gladiator, LOTR, Braveheart, Titanic.... Avatar isn't any less of a "film" than these movies. Other winners, like Forrest Gump, Beautiful mind, Crash.. might have " filmatic "aspirations, but they they are cheesey and not great. Out of the last twenty years, there are only a couple winners that I would call great artistic films, and a couple more that I'd call good ones, and the rest are either epics or okay to shitty dramas ( and chicago, a musical). people get so bent out of shape about what movies get the oscars, thinking they are awarding art. They aren't. The oscars are an industry mutual masterbation, and they award the "movie of the year".

[JoeyJoJo 20]

Out of the last twenty years, there are only a couple winners that I would call great artistic films, and a couple more that I'd call good ones.

My guesses:BigD's great artistic films over the last 20 years that have won an Oscar: No Country, American BeautyBigD's good artistic films over the last 20 years that have won an Oscar: Schindler's List, UnforgivenHow'd I do?(Note: This was harder than I thought and the problem wasn't narrowing it down.)

[digitalmonkey 929]

I enjoyed Up, but Coraline was amazing.

[BigDMcGee 3,367]

My guesses:BigD's great artistic films over the last 20 years that have won an Oscar: No Country, American BeautyBigD's good artistic films over the last 20 years that have won an Oscar: Schindler's List, UnforgivenHow'd I do?(Note: This was harder than I thought and the problem wasn't narrowing it down.)

nail/head

[brvheart 1,768]

Wait...really?I mean, I haven't actually seen it, but I had no idea this was even a remote possibility.

It's good, but it's only there because of the 10 movies thing.

as everyone knew when they first heard it, the ten nominees thing is retard city. What would be the five if they still had their usual half-sense?

I think Joey's correct on this:

* “Avatar” James Cameron and Jon Landau, Producers* “The Hurt Locker” Nominees to be determined* “Inglourious Basterds” Lawrence Bender, Producer* “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Lee Daniels, Sarah Siegel-Magness and Gary Magness, Producers* “Up in the Air” Daniel Dubiecki, Ivan Reitman and Jason Reitman, Producers

My "want to win" votes:Hmm, there seems to be a theme in my picks.

Stuff that won't happen? (Up will win for animation)

[JoeyJoJo 20]

Stuff that won't happen?

That's more like a subplot.

[JoeyJoJo 20]

I don't agree with a lot of what was said here:The humble Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences folks announced their Oscar nominations Tuesday morning, and what was most interesting was not the actual movies nominated for Best Picture, but rather the sheer number of movies nominated. For several decades, the Academy had nominated just five movies, but this year it doubled the number to 10.The increase is: 1) an attempt to boost TV ratings by adding movies that more people may have actually, you know, seen; and 2) an attempt to increase box-office receipts and DVD sales by doubling the number of films that can now claim "Nominated for Best Picture!" in their advertising.The Oscars are merely following the example set by pro sports leagues and the college football bowls -- the bottom line is, there is never a postseason that can't be expanded. The NFL, NBA, NHL and MLB have boosted profits and provided the illusion of greater parity by continually adding teams to their playoffs. College football keeps adding more bowl games, thereby increasing revenue and allowing more mediocre teams to claim a successful season. ("We went to the Meineke Car Care Bowl!")The problem is, Hollywood is not making better movies (see "Bride Wars" and "Old Dogs"). Hollywood is simply deeming lesser movies great. Listen, I love movies -- but looking through the showtimes at my local multiplex each week, I can barely come up with a movie I even want to see, let alone nominate for Best Picture. There may be 20 screens, but 12 will be showing "New Moon," five will be showing "Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel," two will be showing "It's Complicated," and "Up in the Air" will be sold out.Most years, it's difficult enough coming up with five legitimate Best Picture nominees -- honestly, who would want to sit through a repeat showing of "Moulin Rouge," "Gangs of New York," "The Hours" or "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button"? Now the Academy has to come up with 10 nominees! Pretty soon we'll see a Michael Bay movie earning a Best Picture nomination, which would be the equivalent of the Pittsburgh Pirates or Detroit Lions making the playoffs.If the Academy really wants to increase interest in movies, it should go all-out and follow the example of the NCAA men's basketball tournament. Simply announce a 65-movie field at the start of February -- "Land of the Lost" versus "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" in the play-in game! -- and then have an hour-long "American Idol"-type show each weekend during which Academy voters debate, argue, and narrow the field in half until there is a Final Four.This would be a huge hit. For crying out loud, people would tune in just to see who the Academy voters really are and how they justify their votes! (Who voted for "A Beautiful Mind," anyway?)Sigh. All I know is, the Academy doubled the number of nominees, and "The Hangover" still didn't get a Best Picture nod. If that's the best they can do, instead of expanding the field to 10, they should have just narrowed it down to two: "Up" and "Up in the Air."...but there's about a 0% chance I don't come up with some brackets and do this myself.

[LongLiveYorke 38]

I don't agree with a lot of what was said here:...but there's about a 0% chance I don't come up with some brackets and do this myself.

I agree with both what the guy said and the idea of you doing a brackets. I only now wish that I had seen more movies this year so I could participate.

[digitalmonkey 929]

I agree with both what the guy said and the idea of you doing a brackets. I only now wish that I had seen more movies this year so I could participate.

Perhaps we can be given time to watch the movies before we have to vote.