1040 replies to this topic

[Ron_Mexico]

Waiting for Braveheart (no, not you) scene where he's been gutted. Forget the technical term for having your intestines stretched out of your body. Dammit. Anyhow, William Wallace yelling FREEEEEDOOOOM. I need to work on that show. Can't imagine how much shit I'd know if it was actually my job. Guess everyone says that. But dang, sports and pop culture is what I do for fun. Must be great to call it "working"

[DJ Vu]

They did that one.The only one that has actually caused sadness in me is the Bambi one.

[Ron_Mexico]

DJ Vu, on Friday, February 10th, 2012, 5:59 PM, said:

They did that one.The only one that has actually caused sadness in me is the Bambi one.

Dammit. They stole from me. Well, from my mind. First Kevin Smith in Clerks 2. Now HochBambi? Arent you just as sweet as pie? I never saw it, at least not as an adult where I would remember it. What about Old Yeller?

[SuitedAces21]

the bambi one made me a little uncomfortable. but i liked the rest of them. nothing beats rocky 3. those moans are amazing.

[SuitedAces21]

also SI O NO has become the best segment on television. papi talking about people stealing the moon left me on the floor.

[Ron_Mexico]

SuitedAces21, on Friday, February 10th, 2012, 6:30 PM, said:

also SI O NO has become the best segment on television. papi talking about people stealing the moon left me on the floor.

See, I fast forward through that most times. Si si, I'm very intrigued got old for me. And I've watched every dang episode. Sometimes I'll watch if the show is something I want to hear him comment on

[DJ Vu]

Ron_Mexico, on Friday, February 10th, 2012, 4:25 PM, said:

Si si, I'm very intrigued

You never know!

[DJ Vu]

Oh my word.

[Ron_Mexico]

DJ Vu, on Thursday, March 1st, 2012, 11:37 AM, said:

Oh my word.

First off, what excellent reporting. They called him Hackman. So awesome. Just solidifies everything they say about sports spew in general. Hilarious that they made news. Stugotz, while amusing because Dan plays off of him, he might actually annoy me in real life. Twitter is a prime example. I don't get why people get on there and take pride in getting blocked. Really? That's how bad your life is? I follow a porn star or two as well, and people that make comments make me laugh, saying how beautiful she is or what they'd do to them. I just can't wrap my mind around being a star fcker or fishing for retweets or any of that stuff. I guess I've just never wanted to talk to a celebrity that badly. Boy did I go off topic

[SuitedAces21]

marc hackman is the best

[DJ Vu]

This commenter was so close to getting it:Hackman. The name says it all really doesn’t it? Another unqualified thinker, let alone commentator.Stugotz would definitely annoy me in real life. He would probably annoy me in twitter life if I followed him. He sometimes annoys me in radio life.Dan's bias was starting to show through when he tried to defend Lebron's errant pass at the end of the all-star game. He kept framing the argument as making the smart play versus jacking up a 30 footer with a double team. I'm not really sure he totally understands basketball. I mean, he understands certain aspects of it a lot better than a lot of people because he can be analytical and absorb what he reads and hears, but I don't really trust him when he's just going on what he's watching.

[brvheart]

Barkley said Lebron made the right play also. (Besides the bad pass that was stolen)

[DJ Vu]

brvheart, on Thursday, March 1st, 2012, 10:20 AM, said:

Barkley said Lebron made the right play also. (Besides the bad pass that was stolen)

I don't even know how what you said makes any sense. We're specifically talking about the bad pass that was stolen.

[brvheart]

DJ Vu, on Thursday, March 1st, 2012, 12:23 PM, said:

I don't even know how what you said makes any sense. We're specifically talking about the bad pass that was stolen.

I'm saying that Barkley was defending his decision to pass in that spot, not the execution of the pass. You said that Dan was wrong because it was bad execution and a bad decision, and I was just commenting on the fact that Barkley said the same thing as Dan. Unless dan was defending Lebron's execution, but I can't imagine anyone would do that.

[SuitedAces21]

he was double teamed (hehe) so he should've passed. only he hesitated, then tried a difficult cross court pass that obviously failed. correct decision wrong execution.edit: dammit

[DJ Vu]

No, that was not a double team. That was Durant being in position to help. If he turns the corner on Kobe and forces Durant to commit, then Carmelo is even more open than he already was. Or maybe even Dwight under the basket.Brv, that's not what I was saying. I didn't like that he was framing it as an either/or situation. He always calls out people who do that and wonder why there aren't other options in between. Lebron had other options besides shooting a 30 footer or passing immediately.

[Ron_Mexico]

Namely? People just want to kill Lebron. I watched LBJ's 48 Special vs Detroit live, and after that, everyone thought he was a stone cold killer. He was. It's all just bs bluster narrative. He did shrink in the finals, sure, but the guy just isn't wired to be a ball hog. Kobe gets praised for averaging 30 a game but nobody mentions his efficiency, or lack thereof. 80% of the guys in the league average 25ppg if they get to jack up 25 shots a game.

[DJ Vu]

Ron_Mexico, on Thursday, March 1st, 2012, 4:21 PM, said:

80% of the guys in the league average 25ppg if they get to jack up 25 shots a game.

Incorrect.

[Ron_Mexico]

Fine, 50%Plenty of talent, not enough shots.

[DJ Vu]

Ron_Mexico, on Thursday, March 1st, 2012, 4:49 PM, said:

Fine, 50%Plenty of talent, not enough shots.

Well, let's get more specific. 1 point per field goal attempt is pretty awful. Kobe averages 25 ppg on 19.5 fga for his career. So I'm really commenting on your idea that anybody could be Kobe if they just got the shots, not specifically your 25 points on 25 shots. Also, it takes talent to get shots. What kind of shots do you think a guy like Steve Kerr would be getting if he had to get off 25 a game? So a guy who is scoring 1.4 points per shot might be more efficient, but his efficiency is going to go down if he has to start taking more shots.Edit: I didn't really want this to be another Kobe vs. Lebron argument. I was just talking about Dan's analysis of the situation.