Jump to content


Democrats Vow To Count Illegals In The 2010 Census


  • Please log in to reply
52 replies to this topic

#1 85suited

85suited

    Politics Forum Pundit

  • Members
  • 1,685 posts
  • Location:In The Obamanation
  • Favorite Poker Game:Vast Right Wing Conspirator

Posted 14 October 2009 - 01:23 PM

QUOTE
The Commerce Department and Census Bureau declared Tuesday that an amendment by Sen. David Vitter, R-La., to require the 2010 census to ask all persons their citizenship and immigration status would scuttle any chance that the census could be done on time and would cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.

Scott Threlkeld/The Times-PicayuneU.S. Sen. David Vitter portrays his amendment as an attempt to keep Louisiana from losing one of its seven congressional districts in the coming reapportionment.The warning came even as the Senate Democratic leadership sought to head off a vote on the Vitter amendment to the Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriations bill. An effort by the leadership to invoke cloture failed Tuesday evening, with the fight over whether to vote on the Vitter amendment, which he co-sponsored with Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah, expected to resume today.

Vitter portrays his amendment as a last-ditch effort to protect the political power of Louisiana and other states with relatively small populations of people who are either not citizens or are not legal residents in the United States, and keep Louisiana from losing one of its seven congressional districts in the coming reapportionment.

The decennial census, required by the Constitution to count all "persons," is used for the purposes of congressional apportionment and legislative redistricting. The result is that places with more people -- regardless of their status -- get more representation.

Or as Vitter put it in floor debate on his amendment last week, "States that have large populations of illegals would be rewarded for that. Other states, including my home state of Louisiana, would be penalized."

Vitter said that in addition to Louisiana, the states of Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania and South Carolina "would lose out." He challenged the senators from those states, "if you vote against this amendment, then you are voting against the interests of your state."

By far the biggest winner under the existing system is California, followed by Texas, New York and Florida.

But opponents of the measure described it as ill-advised, and in its intent, both unconstitutional and discriminatory.

The Census Bureau, and the Commerce Department of which it is a part, said that 425 million of the 600 million census forms already had been printed, and that even adding an addenda sheet with the Vitter question also would require rewriting software code, reprogramming scanners and retraining census workers to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars.


#2 nutzbuster

nutzbuster

    Point taken....

  • Members
  • 11,343 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Phoenix / Motor City

Posted 14 October 2009 - 01:29 PM

standard



F Cancer

#3 gobears

gobears

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,082 posts
  • Location:Los Gatos, CA

Posted 14 October 2009 - 02:24 PM


So it's been ten years since the last census. Most of those years were under GW and with full Republican control of Congress. Me thinks that would have been a better time to put it up for vote than now.

From reading the last sentence, I have no doubts this would cost a ton of money to enact at this late date.
Work to live, don't live to work - Todd Harrison

#4 Naked_Cowboy

Naked_Cowboy

    the dynamo of volition

  • Members
  • 4,479 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dallas, TX
  • Interests:playing all your best games

Posted 14 October 2009 - 02:37 PM

but we're offsetting the cost with all the money acorn won't be embezzeling.

amirite?!
~certified bumhunter~

#5 gobears

gobears

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,082 posts
  • Location:Los Gatos, CA

Posted 14 October 2009 - 02:41 PM

QUOTE (Naked_Cowboy @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 3:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
but we're offsetting the cost with all the money acorn won't be embezzeling.

amirite?!


Nah - that money will be used for universal health care or TARP 2/3 (I lost track of what TARP we were on)
Work to live, don't live to work - Todd Harrison

#6 CaneBrain

CaneBrain

    The chosen few....

  • Members
  • 14,046 posts
  • Location:The NFL Films Vault
  • Favorite Poker Game:5/10 NLHE (100 max buy in)

Posted 14 October 2009 - 06:12 PM

I dont know how any human with a brain could read that article and then label it "democrats vow to count illegals in the 2010 census". That's not what it says. It's not even close to what it says. 85, I would think about trying for a headline writing job at Fox News. You'll fit right in.
"Give a little bit.....give a little bit of your chips to me...."

#7 strategy

strategy

    Internet expert

  • Members
  • 15,924 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:strategy
  • Favorite Poker Game:strategy

Posted 14 October 2009 - 06:15 PM

.
QUOTE (ShakeZuma @ Wednesday, November 2nd, 2011, 4:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
seriously though, with that grammar it's really like, I mean it doesn't bother me as much that she gets beat, you know?


#8 LongLiveYorke

LongLiveYorke

    Ending the world one proton at a time

  • Members
  • 8,221 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manhattan
  • Interests:fizziks, teh maths, Raid-o-head, Rod Reynolds

Posted 14 October 2009 - 07:46 PM

NO! WE'RE COUNTING PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY!!!!!! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

#9 85suited

85suited

    Politics Forum Pundit

  • Members
  • 1,685 posts
  • Location:In The Obamanation
  • Favorite Poker Game:Vast Right Wing Conspirator

Posted 14 October 2009 - 09:22 PM

QUOTE (CaneBrain @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 9:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I dont know how any human with a brain could read that article and then label it "democrats vow to count illegals in the 2010 census". That's not what it says. It's not even close to what it says. 85, I would think about trying for a headline writing job at Fox News. You'll fit right in.


Let's see Commerce Dept - run by Democratic appointee and hmm let's see...The Census Beauru Chief(democrat), who has to to work closely with the White House (democrat)& Axelord (democrat) & Emanuel(democrat)... Shoot down an admendment "to ask all persons their citizenship and immigration status"

Don't worry - they wouldn't dream of politicizing the census



QUOTE (LongLiveYorke @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 10:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
NO! WE'RE COUNTING PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY!!!!!! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Illegal aliens should not be counted in the census. Their presence here is illegal and must not be used to direct federal dollars to the areas in which they serve as illegal squatters

#10 CaneBrain

CaneBrain

    The chosen few....

  • Members
  • 14,046 posts
  • Location:The NFL Films Vault
  • Favorite Poker Game:5/10 NLHE (100 max buy in)

Posted 14 October 2009 - 09:31 PM

QUOTE (85suited @ Thursday, October 15th, 2009, 12:22 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Let's see Commerce Dept - run by Democratic appointee and hmm let's see...The Census Beauru Chief(democrat), who has to to work closely with the White House (democrat)& Axelord (democrat) & Emanuel(democrat)... Shoot down an admendment "to ask all persons their citizenship and immigration status"

Don't worry - they wouldn't dream of politicizing the census




Illegal aliens should not be counted in the census. Their presence here is illegal and must not be used to direct federal dollars to the areas in which they serve as illegal squatters



It's ok I am sure you just don't understand what the word vow means. Because then you would understand the difference between a Democratic politician openly declaring that illegal aliens should be counted in the census and what was in that article.

Also if you have any evidence that what the Commerce Dept. said about the cost of changing the census forms at such a late date is untrue please feel free to present it at any time.
"Give a little bit.....give a little bit of your chips to me...."

#11 strategy's_touch

strategy's_touch

    has enough mobile posts to have a title

  • Members
  • 1,183 posts

Posted 14 October 2009 - 09:32 PM

the first step to addressing the problem is knowing the scale

frankly I'm shocked that you see this as a bad thing
I got tired of logging in and out on my iPod. I made this so I could stay logged in on both my PC and this.

#12 85suited

85suited

    Politics Forum Pundit

  • Members
  • 1,685 posts
  • Location:In The Obamanation
  • Favorite Poker Game:Vast Right Wing Conspirator

Posted 14 October 2009 - 09:39 PM

QUOTE (CaneBrain @ Thursday, October 15th, 2009, 12:31 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It's ok I am sure you just don't understand what the word vow means. Because then you would understand the difference between a Democratic politician openly declaring that illegal aliens should be counted in the census and what was in that article.

Also if you have any evidence that what the Commerce Dept. said about the cost of changing the census forms at such a late date is untrue please feel free to present it at any time.



Really - Your going to try and play semantics? Give me a break - you know exactly what is going on here.. Don't try and pretend that this isn't a power grab

They just happend to not print a question about your legal status on the form? They forgot? it was a oversite?


So, since when did Chairman Maobama et al worry about spending hundreds of millions of dollars?
They blew over a trillion dollars last year. Hundreds of millions is a drop in the bucket for these democrats.

#13 CaneBrain

CaneBrain

    The chosen few....

  • Members
  • 14,046 posts
  • Location:The NFL Films Vault
  • Favorite Poker Game:5/10 NLHE (100 max buy in)

Posted 14 October 2009 - 09:46 PM

QUOTE (85suited @ Thursday, October 15th, 2009, 1:39 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Really - Your going to try and play semantics? Give me a break - you know exactly what is going on here.. Don't try and pretend that this isn't a power grab

They just happend to not print a question about your legal status on the form? They forgot? it was a oversite?


So, since when did Chairman Maobama et al worry about spending hundreds of millions of dollars?
They blew over a trillion dollars last year. Hundreds of millions is a drop in the bucket for these democrats.


oh.

love the idea that you are mad they are (according to you) blowing trillions.....and now mad that they wont spend hundreds of millions more on the census. we want fiscal responsibility.....but not right now for this thing!


"Give a little bit.....give a little bit of your chips to me...."

#14 85suited

85suited

    Politics Forum Pundit

  • Members
  • 1,685 posts
  • Location:In The Obamanation
  • Favorite Poker Game:Vast Right Wing Conspirator

Posted 15 October 2009 - 05:40 AM

QUOTE (CaneBrain @ Thursday, October 15th, 2009, 12:46 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
oh.

love the idea that you are mad they are (according to you) blowing trillions.....and now mad that they wont spend hundreds of millions more on the census. we want fiscal responsibility.....but not right now for this thing!



Thanks for making my point... The democrats have never wanted fiscal reponsibility, except for when it comes in handy in this instance... you guys are a joke

#15 gobears

gobears

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,082 posts
  • Location:Los Gatos, CA

Posted 15 October 2009 - 09:56 PM

QUOTE (85suited @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 10:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Let's see Commerce Dept - run by Democratic appointee and hmm let's see...The Census Beauru Chief(democrat), who has to to work closely with the White House (democrat)& Axelord (democrat) & Emanuel(democrat)... Shoot down an admendment "to ask all persons their citizenship and immigration status"

Don't worry - they wouldn't dream of politicizing the census


So I'm sure you were posting about how wrong it was for GW's minions to politicize the Justice Department when they basically said no to every Democrat or Non-Christian who applied for any position right?

And again, if this was so important, GW and the Republicans had six years where they controlled Congress to enact some law to not count illegals. What happened?
Work to live, don't live to work - Todd Harrison

#16 DonkSlayer

DonkSlayer

    very, very standard

  • Members
  • 5,032 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Richmond, VA
  • Favorite Poker Game:PL Omaha

Posted 16 October 2009 - 03:49 AM

QUOTE (gobears @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 6:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
So it's been ten years since the last census. Most of those years were under GW and with full Republican control of Congress. Me thinks that would have been a better time to put it up for vote than now.

From reading the last sentence, I have no doubts this would cost a ton of money to enact at this late date.


Yet, Dems have no problem spending a shyton when it's something they think is right...I would say counting non-citizens in a census that will, among other things, determine House of Representatives count for each state is worth the extra time and money.

This is pretty standard by statists....get everyone to vote, knowing that those who are a lock to vote for them certainly won't be running to take their seat of power in Washington!
Fortune favors the brave.

#17 85suited

85suited

    Politics Forum Pundit

  • Members
  • 1,685 posts
  • Location:In The Obamanation
  • Favorite Poker Game:Vast Right Wing Conspirator

Posted 16 October 2009 - 04:01 AM

QUOTE (gobears @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 12:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
So I'm sure you were posting about how wrong it was for GW's minions to politicize the Justice Department when they basically said no to every Democrat or Non-Christian who applied for any position right?

And again, if this was so important, GW and the Republicans had six years where they controlled Congress to enact some law to not count illegals. What happened?



They did in 1790,

The census has drifted far from its constitutional roots

#18 Pot Odds RAC

Pot Odds RAC

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,970 posts
  • Location:Motown
  • Favorite Poker Game:Live NL TxHE

Posted 16 October 2009 - 04:30 AM

QUOTE (85suited @ Thursday, October 15th, 2009, 9:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thanks for making my point... The democrats have never wanted fiscal reponsibility, except for when it comes in handy in this instance... you guys are a joke

This.

#19 Pot Odds RAC

Pot Odds RAC

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,970 posts
  • Location:Motown
  • Favorite Poker Game:Live NL TxHE

Posted 16 October 2009 - 04:34 AM

QUOTE (DonkSlayer @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 7:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yet, Dems have no problem spending a shyton when it's something they think is right...I would say counting non-citizens in a census that will, among other things, determine House of Representatives count for each state is worth the extra time and money.

This is pretty standard by statists....get everyone to vote, knowing that those who are a lock to vote for them certainly won't be running to take their seat of power in Washington!

Counting non-citizens Illegals to determine the House of Representatives is not a good thing and a serious misapplication of the notion of Representation. How can you justify that as a good thing and money well spent? Implying that illegals should have a say or somehow influence the make-up of the House is wrong. Census results determine more than voting districts. Federal dollars are often allocated based on Census results. States with large numbers of Illegals will be rewarded for the next ten years for having dispropotionate numbers of Illegals.

#20 Pot Odds RAC

Pot Odds RAC

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,970 posts
  • Location:Motown
  • Favorite Poker Game:Live NL TxHE

Posted 16 October 2009 - 04:44 AM

QUOTE
The Census Bureau, and the Commerce Department of which it is a part, said that 425 million of the 600 million census forms already had been printed, and that even adding an addenda sheet with the Vitter question also would require rewriting software code, reprogramming scanners and retraining census workers to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars.


And if this takes hundreds of millions of dollars, there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with the process.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users