![]() ![]() |
Thursday, October 8th, 2009, 4:56 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Poker Forum Newbie Group: Members Posts: 73 Joined: November 23rd, 2004 From: So Cal Member No.: 14 |
I tried to search but go no results so sorry if it has been asked.
I play live only no only 4-8 limit poker, what type of bankroll would you suggest I Keep on hand? I see people buy in the game 80-120, I usually buy in for 200. Thanks for any help. -------------------- Johnny Boy :spade:
How much time do you need to ponder folding that 46? |
|
|
|
Thursday, October 8th, 2009, 6:45 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Poker Forum Nut Group: Members Posts: 458 Joined: January 31st, 2005 From: Las Vegas Member No.: 2,826 |
300 BB's is enough at these limits, some people think 500 to 1000 BB's tho...
|
|
|
|
Friday, October 9th, 2009, 12:01 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Poker Forum Regular Group: Members Posts: 119 Joined: February 11th, 2009 From: Boston Member No.: 35,896 Favorite Poker Game: Limit Holdem |
I tried to search but go no results so sorry if it has been asked. I play live only no only 4-8 limit poker, what type of bankroll would you suggest I Keep on hand? I see people buy in the game 80-120, I usually buy in for 200. Thanks for any help. I would say you could make due with 200 BBs especially since it's 4-8 live poker. I am assuming the average pot has like 5-7 players to the flop, and you'll have days where you'll win 2-3 times your buy-in. I don't put much thought into bankroll requirements though. It's only important if you're planning on trying to make poker your sole source of income. In that case, I would suggest a minimum 500 BBs with a 2nd full bankroll to have as a cushion to meet living expenses for your inevitable losing periods. Sucks to try to meet your monthly nut of bills & rent when you're stuck $4,500 for the month at 20-40 level or something like that. |
|
|
|
Friday, October 9th, 2009, 4:55 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Poker Forum Nut Group: Members Posts: 292 Joined: November 6th, 2005 From: Massachusetts Member No.: 12,636 Favorite Poker Game: LHE |
Depends what you mean as bankroll. At the table, it doesn't matter as long as you have at least 12 BB's on the table for a given hand. 50 bets should be fine and you should probably take a walk if you drop that. If by bankroll, you mean this is the only money you have available for poker, 500-1000BBs. And don't be afraid to drop down if it gets bad.
-------------------- QUOTE(RabidTortuga @ Thursday, May 29th, 2008, 10:44 PM) [snapback]2630463[/snapback] See, that's what I like about poker. Even the mildly retarded can play. |
|
|
|
Monday, October 19th, 2009, 11:37 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() 2009 Stanley Cup Champions Group: Moderators Posts: 28,921 Joined: February 23rd, 2006 From: Thunder Bay, ON Member No.: 19,127 |
Depends what you mean as bankroll. At the table, it doesn't matter as long as you have at least 12 BB's on the table for a given hand. 50 bets should be fine and you should probably take a walk if you drop that. If by bankroll, you mean this is the only money you have available for poker, 500-1000BBs. And don't be afraid to drop down if it gets bad. 500-1000 BBs is insanely nitty for full ring limit. 300 is the standard. Furthermore, nobody is playing 4-8 for a reasonable living, so I'm guessing he's not going to need to be THAT strict. 200-300 is probably fine, but it all just depends on what kind of risk you want, and what your winrate is. If the games are anything close to what they were a few years ago at 4/8 live limit, then anyone who has read and understood SSHE is going to have no problem in these games, so 200-300 BBs is fine. Of course, if for whatever reason we're playing for a living at 4/8, then having more could be safer, and smarter, or at least have several months worth of expenses in the bank. If we're just talking purely recreational play, but serious enough to the point where we are tracking a bankroll, and don't plan to infuse money into it from other sources, then 300 is fine. One more caveat, it's entirely a personal choice based on the amount of comfort you want after a losing session, and what you want your risk of ruin to be. A winning player will have very little ROR with 300 bbs, less than 1% for most winners. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Tuesday, October 27th, 2009, 5:27 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Poker Forum Newbie Group: Members Posts: 86 Joined: January 23rd, 2008 Member No.: 31,516 Favorite Poker Game: Regular in the $10/$20 and $20/$40 LHE @ Foxwoods |
300BB's has worked for me from 3-6 right up through 20-40. But I play in the "juiciest game on the east coast" apparently according to most people I know (the $20-$40 LHE game @ Foxwoods).
Agree with Zach, 500-1000 is insane. I think I read somewhere that if you win 1/2 of a BB per hour with 300 BB's you have like a 95% chance of not going broke or something like that. -------------------- Gabe Kaplan: "In case you missed that, Bob Safai said that Phil relaxed himself by looking at a picture of himself under the shower." |
|
|
|
Tuesday, October 27th, 2009, 12:29 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Limit Holdem Dinosaur Group: Root Admin Posts: 7,045 Joined: July 9th, 2006 From: Scarberia Member No.: 15,500 |
My largest downswing at live limit holdem is less than 200 Big Bets and probably isn't more than 150 Big Bets. Now those games were very good and I had a pretty significant edge.
-------------------- Bob
pokermanager@fullcontactpoker.com |
|
|
|
Monday, November 2nd, 2009, 3:40 PM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Baby, you're all I crave Group: Members Posts: 2,405 Joined: May 26th, 2007 From: Buffalo Member No.: 27,755 Favorite Poker Game: Shorthanded Limit HE |
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009, 7:41 PM
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Poker Forum Newbie Group: Members Posts: 79 Joined: August 30th, 2005 From: Cleveland, OH Member No.: 9,260 |
Would 300BB be enough to play it online? Or would you then look at 500+?
-------------------- chipper0027 on PokerStars
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, November 4th, 2009, 1:56 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() 2009 Stanley Cup Champions Group: Moderators Posts: 28,921 Joined: February 23rd, 2006 From: Thunder Bay, ON Member No.: 19,127 |
Full ring, yes, as long as you're willing to move down if you hit a bad patch.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Wednesday, November 4th, 2009, 11:45 PM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Poker Forum Regular Group: Members Posts: 126 Joined: May 22nd, 2008 From: Australia! Member No.: 33,043 Favorite Poker Game: High stakes play money. |
Would 300BB be enough to play it online? Or would you then look at 500+? 300BB's for anything under 2/4 is okay. Over that it sucks because swinging 100BB's in a session which happens kinda regularly can really stress you out. I like 500 - 1000 personally. |
|
|
|
Monday, November 16th, 2009, 10:05 AM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Poker Forum Veteran Group: Members Posts: 1,032 Joined: April 14th, 2007 From: Sherwood Park, Alberta Member No.: 27,333 Favorite Poker Game: HORSE. Home game donkaments |
300BB's for anything under 2/4 is okay. Over that it sucks because swinging 100BB's in a session which happens kinda regularly can really stress you out. I like 500 - 1000 personally. I dunno... Hopefully 100BB swings should a lot more rare than regular. 1000BBs is pretty nitty - but to be fair, the games at higher levels are obv tougher, and no bankroll is enough if you can't beat the game. Better to grind out 2/4 then lose money at 5/10. -------------------- Progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things. (Robert Heinlein).
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 17th, 2009, 1:40 AM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Poker Forum Regular Group: Members Posts: 126 Joined: May 22nd, 2008 From: Australia! Member No.: 33,043 Favorite Poker Game: High stakes play money. |
I dunno... Hopefully 100BB swings should a lot more rare than regular. 1000BBs is pretty nitty - but to be fair, the games at higher levels are obv tougher, and no bankroll is enough if you can't beat the game. Better to grind out 2/4 then lose money at 5/10. TBH when I wrote that the post was directed towards online BR management. I'd have no idea bout live... |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 21st, 2009 - 11:16 AM |