Jump to content

09/10 Fantasy Hockey Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

Other sports boards have these and I use them all the time and figured we should have one as well. Post up your drafts, trades,etc for comments and advice.Took my first yahoo draft this morning, gotta get a couple in before Adams league just to get a feel. Fairly happy with my team. 12 person league, 2 C's, 2 RW's, 2 LW's, 4 D, 2 G, 4 BNCH. Scoring is standard G, A, +/-, PIM, PPP, SOG, W, GAA, S%, SO.1. (4) Zach Parise LW2. (21) Dion Phaneuf D3. (28) Eric Staal C4. (45) Chris Osgood G5. (52) Shea Weber D6. (69) David Booth LW7. (76) Phil Kessel RW8. (93) Andrei Markov D9. (100) John Tavares C10. (117) Chris Mason G11. (124) Jaroslav Spacek D12. (141) Ales Hemsky RW13. (148) Victor Hedman D14. (165) Ryane Clowe LW15. (172) Brooks Laich C16. (189) Mikhail Grabovski CTon of good talent left untouched so I should be moving and shaking things as the season nears.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Parise 4th overall seems like an interesting pick... Lemaire is back coaching the Devils, and we know he hates offense.
That was actually the yahoos pick since I forgot I had the draft and didn't get in until about 4 picks before my 2nd. First round went like this though...1. Alexander Ovechkin 2. Evgeni Malkin 3. Sidney Crosby 4. Zach Parise 5. Roberto Luongo 6. Ryan Getzlaf 7. Mike Green 8. Jarome Iginla 9. Evgeni Nabokov 10. Corey Perry 11. Vincent Lecavalier 12. Pavel DatsyukBeing the homer I am I would have taken Pavel at 4.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Honestly, I think its the worst pick to have. I have Ovechkin, Crosby, and Malkin in the top 3, then a drop off. Who would you include in the top 3?
you didnt understand my post. I think anyone with half a brain who follows fantasy hockey would agree, that the top 3 is by far better than anyone else.I was saying its not exactly a "IMO" thing. :club:
Link to post
Share on other sites
you didnt understand my post. I think anyone with half a brain who follows fantasy hockey would agree, that the top 3 is by far better than anyone else.I was saying its not exactly a "IMO" thing. :club:
I will argue this a bit...In a pool like the AHL where goals matter more. Crosby's value shouldnt be anywhere close to Ovechkin's.As a matter of fact there were 20 guys with more goals.Guys like Parise, Kovalchuk had better overall numbers. As well a healthy Hossa and Gaborik would be more valuable. IMO..If you are a plus minus guy Crosby's plus 3 isnt anywhere close to the other top guys.Is Crosby one of the top 3 players in the league, for sure. Is he a top 3 fantasy guy, not close.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I will argue this a bit...In a pool like the AHL where goals matter more. Crosby's value shouldnt be anywhere close to Ovechkin's.As a matter of fact there were 20 guys with more goals.Guys like Parise, Kovalchuk had better overall numbers. As well a healthy Hossa and Gaborik would be more valuable. IMO..If you are a plus minus guy Crosby's plus 3 isnt anywhere close to the other top guys.Is Crosby one of the top 3 players in the league, for sure. Is he a top 3 fantasy guy, not close.
your right, but we werent talking about an AHL style pool, ie assissts worth only half a point.Different pools, different players. It was just the 3 best players in the league to take in a pool comment. I guess I just assumed straight pts.In Steve's setup for example, a good case can be made for a player like Datsyuk, a very good +/- guy, as a solid 4th.The reason why Parise goes 4th in that pool is because he had a sick year in +/- in that format. I wouldnt take him 4th, but I get the computerized ranking to some degree.
Link to post
Share on other sites
your right, but we werent talking about an AHL style pool, ie assissts worth only half a point.Different pools, different players. It was just the 3 best players in the league to take in a pool comment. I guess I just assumed straight pts.In Steve's setup for example, a good case can be made for a player like Datsyuk, a very good +/- guy, as a solid 4th.The reason why Parise goes 4th in that pool is because he had a sick year in +/- in that format. I wouldnt take him 4th, but I get the computerized ranking to some degree.
correct...your hockey pool knowledge is unmatched..seriouslyWhy did we take you in the Ahl anyways??We dont need more Bobs :club:
Link to post
Share on other sites
correct...your hockey pool knowledge is unmatched..seriouslyWhy did we take you in the Ahl anyways??We dont need more Bobs :club:
I suck, just ask the FCHL guys.I haven't chosen 1 player in the farm draft that ever made my roster in the history of that pool. :ts
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...