Pot Odds RAC 23 Posted August 2, 2009 Share Posted August 2, 2009 Just watched "House of Games" for the first time in a long time. Still a very odd movie for me. Love some of the dialogue.My main problem with Mamet is he gets this really stiff performance from his actors. I think he goes for this stiff delivery because he is shooting for some sort of "hard boiled" characters to rapid fire his dialogue. He also has a penchant for casting his wives. Rebecca Pidgeon was OK in her roles, but Lindsay Crouse was just painful to watch at times in HoG. She has played the EXACT same character at least three other times (CSI, L&O, Columbo).Haven't seen "Heist" in a very long time, but remember it as pretty good. Too many twists just for the sake of having twists. Same with "The Spanish Prisoner".I also seem to remember really liking "State & Main"I just think that Mamet is a better screenplay writer than director. Link to post Share on other sites
keith crime 8 Posted August 2, 2009 Share Posted August 2, 2009 For better or worse he makes his actors do thatHe also hates women but he's a great wrterCheck out Glengarry Glen Ross it's great Link to post Share on other sites
frautotenkinder 1,026 Posted August 3, 2009 Share Posted August 3, 2009 I recently rewatched About Last Night. I was squinting at my TV, and mentally recasting the movie, wondering if it was the thespian talents of Jim Belushi, Demi Moore, and Rob Lowe which made it feel so flat. Maybe. I don't know. He also hates women but he's a great wrterYeah, that's what I've heard--but when I think about his movies, he seems to enjoy torturing his male characters, also. Usually he doesn't have a nice, likeable character--and if the character is nice, he is somehow sniveling and weak, as well. Of course he could write female characters like that--but he seems exclusively interested in watching men talk. Link to post Share on other sites
vbnautilus 49 Posted August 3, 2009 Share Posted August 3, 2009 My main problem with Mamet is he gets this really stiff performance from his actors. I think he goes for this stiff delivery because he is shooting for some sort of "hard boiled" characters to rapid fire his dialogue.His philosophy is that the emotion should not be acted by the actors, rather it should arise from the story itself. I find it both interesting and somewhat annoying. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now